A concluding comment: Toward a critical social network analysis

被引：1
作者：
Breiger, Ronald L. [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Arizona, Sch Sociol, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
来源：
SOCIAL NETWORKS | 2021年 / 67卷
关键词：
Ethics; Reflexivity; Critical SNA;
D O I：
10.1016/j.socnet.2020.12.004
中图分类号：
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号：
030303 ;
摘要：
The authors of articles in this special issue on "Ethics in SNA" contribute to enriching the continuing discussion of major ethical dilemmas that social network analysts need to confront. These articles encourage us to replace silence with thoughtful consideration and innovative paths forward. I highlight three themes that emerged in my own reading of these contributions: moving beyond "ethics versus science," deepening reflexivity, and possible approaches toward a critical SNA.
引用
收藏
页码：74 / 75
页数：2
相关论文
共 15 条
[11]   Moral bureaucracies and social network research [J].
Molina, Jose Luis ;
Borgatti, Stephen P. .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2021, 67 :13-19
[12]   Privacy and confidentiality considerations for collecting HIV risk network data among men who have sex with men and implications for constructing valid risk networks [J].
Rudolph, Abby E. ;
Young, April M. .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2021, 67 :47-54
[13]  
Smith C., 2010, What is a person?
[14]  
Tubaro P., 2020, IN PRESS
[15]   Whose results are these anyway? Reciprocity and the ethics of "giving back" after social network research [J].
Tubaro, Paola .
SOCIAL NETWORKS, 2021, 67 :65-73
12