Belief in conspiracy theories: The predictive role of schizotypy, Machiavellianism, and primary psychopathy

被引:86
作者
March, Evita [1 ]
Springer, Jordan [2 ]
机构
[1] Federat Univ Australia, Sch Hlth & Life Sci, Berwick, Australia
[2] Federat Univ Australia, Sch Hlth & Life Sci, Ballarat, Vic, Australia
关键词
DARK TRIAD; VULNERABLE NARCISSISM; SECONDARY PSYCHOPATHY; GRANDIOSE NARCISSISM; PERSONALITY; ASSOCIATIONS; BEHAVIOR;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0225964
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
A conspiracy theory refers to an alternative explanation of an event involving a conspirator plot organised by powerful people or organisations. Belief in conspiracy theories is related to negative societal outcomes such as poor medical decisions and a decrease in prosocial behaviour. Given these negative outcomes, researchers have explored predictors of belief in conspiracy theories in an attempt to understand and possibly manage these beliefs. In the current study, we explored the utility of personality in predicting belief in conspiracy theories. The aim of the current study was to explore the utility of the odd beliefs/magical thinking subtype of schizotypy, Machiavellianism, grandiose narcissism, vulnerable narcissism, primary psychopathy, and secondary psychopathy in predicting belief in conspiracy theories. Participants (N = 230; 44.7% male, 55.3% female) completed an anonymous, confidential online questionnaire which comprised demographics and measures of personality traits and belief in conspiracy theories. The total regression model indicated odd beliefs/magical thinking, trait Machiavellianism, and primary psychopathy were significant, positive predictors of belief in conspiracy theories. No other predictors reached significance. Results of the current study highlight individuals who might be more susceptible to believing conspiracy theories. Specifically, these results indicate that the individual more likely to believe in conspiracy theories may have unusual patterns of thinking and cognitions, be strategic and manipulative, and display interpersonal and affective deficits.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 42 条
[31]   Two subtypes of psychopathic violent offenders that parallel primary and secondary variants [J].
Skeem, Jennifer ;
Johansson, Peter ;
Andershed, Henrik ;
Kerr, Margaret ;
Louden, Jennifer Eno .
JOURNAL OF ABNORMAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 116 (02) :395-409
[32]   Putting the stress on conspiracy theories: Examining associations between psychological stress, anxiety, and belief in conspiracy theories [J].
Swami, Viren ;
Furnham, Adrian ;
Smyth, Nina ;
Weis, Laura ;
Lay, Alixe ;
Clow, Angela .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2016, 99 :72-76
[33]   Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories [J].
Swami, Viren ;
Voracek, Martin ;
Stieger, Stefan ;
Tran, Ulrich S. ;
Furnham, Adrian .
COGNITION, 2014, 133 (03) :572-585
[34]   Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: the case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia [J].
Swami, Viren .
FRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY, 2012, 3
[35]   Conspiracist ideation in Britain and Austria: Evidence of a monological belief system and associations between individual psychological differences and real-world and fictitious conspiracy theories [J].
Swami, Viren ;
Coles, Rebecca ;
Stieger, Stefan ;
Pietschnig, Jakob ;
Furnham, Adrian ;
Rehim, Sherry ;
Voracek, Martin .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2011, 102 :443-463
[36]   Unanswered Questions: A Preliminary Investigation of Personality and Individual Difference Predictors of 9/11 Conspiracist Beliefs [J].
Swami, Viren ;
Chamorro-Premuzic, Tomas ;
Furnham, Adrian .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2010, 24 (06) :749-761
[37]  
Uscinski J.E., 2014, American Conspiracy Theories
[38]   What Drives Conspiratorial Beliefs? The Role of Informational Cues and Predispositions [J].
Uscinski, Joseph E. ;
Klofstad, Casey ;
Atkinson, Matthew D. .
POLITICAL RESEARCH QUARTERLY, 2016, 69 (01) :57-71
[40]   Why Education Predicts Decreased Belief in Conspiracy Theories [J].
van Prooijen, Jan-Willem .
APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 31 (01) :50-58