Subjective Responses to Emotional Stimuli During Labeling, Reappraisal, and Distraction

被引:201
作者
Lieberman, Matthew D. [1 ]
Inagaki, Tristen K. [1 ]
Tabibnia, Golnaz [2 ]
Crockett, Molly J. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Dept Psychol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Carnegie Mellon Univ, Dept Social & Decis Sci, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 USA
[3] Univ Cambridge, Dept Expt Psychol, Cambridge CB2 3EB, England
关键词
emotion; emotion regulation; emotional experience; FACIAL EXPRESSIONS; COGNITIVE CONTROL; AMYGDALA ACTIVITY; SOCIAL-BEHAVIOR; UNCERTAINTY; INHIBITION; EXPERIENCE; MEMORIES; FEELINGS; CHILDREN;
D O I
10.1037/a0023503
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Although multiple neuroimaging studies suggest that affect labeling (i.e., putting feelings into words) can dampen affect-related responses in the amygdala, the consequences of affect labeling have not been examined in other channels of emotional responding. We conducted four studies examining the effect of affect labeling on self-reported emotional experience. In study one, self-reported distress was lower during affect labeling, compared to passive watching, of negative emotional pictures. Studies two and three added reappraisal and distraction conditions, respectively. Affect labeling showed similar effects on self-reported distress as both of these intentional emotion regulation strategies. In each of the first three studies, however, participant predictions about the effects of affect labeling suggest that unlike reappraisal and distraction, people do not believe affect labeling to be an effective emotion regulation strategy. Even after having the experience of affect labels leading to lower distress, participants still predicted that affect labeling would increase distress in the future. Thus, affect labeling is best described as an incidental emotion regulation process. Finally, study four employed positive emotional pictures and here, affect labeling was associated with diminished self-reported pleasure, relative to passive watching. This suggests that affect labeling tends to dampen affective responses in general, rather than specifically alleviating negative affect.
引用
收藏
页码:468 / 480
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1999, The Center for Research in Psychophysiology
[2]   Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans [J].
Aron, AR ;
Fletcher, PC ;
Bullmore, ET ;
Sahakian, BJ ;
Robbins, TW .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (02) :115-116
[3]   The Feeling of Uncertainty Intensifies Affective Reactions [J].
Bar-Anan, Yoav ;
Wilson, Timothy D. ;
Gilbert, Daniel T. .
EMOTION, 2009, 9 (01) :123-127
[4]   Using Neuroscience to Broaden Emotion Regulation: Theoretical and Methodological Considerations [J].
Berkman, Elliot T. ;
Lieberman, Matthew D. .
SOCIAL AND PERSONALITY PSYCHOLOGY COMPASS, 2009, 3 (04) :475-493
[5]   Inhibitory spillover: Intentional motor inhibition produces incidental limbic inhibition via right inferior frontal cortex [J].
Berkman, Elliot T. ;
Burklund, Lisa ;
Lieberman, Matthew D. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2009, 47 (02) :705-712
[6]  
BURKLUND LJ, LABELING YO IN PRESS
[7]   RECOGNITION OF EMOTIONAL EXPRESSION BY ABUSED-CHILDREN [J].
CAMRAS, LA ;
GROW, JG ;
RIBORDY, SC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY, 1983, 12 (03) :325-328
[8]  
Cohen JR., 2010, Self-control in Society, Mind, and Brain, DOI DOI 10.1093/ACPROF:OSO/9780195391381.003.0008
[9]   Making sense of loss and benefiting from the experience: Two construals of meaning [J].
Davis, CG ;
Nolen-Hoeksema, S ;
Larson, J .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (02) :561-574
[10]  
DENHAM SA, 1986, CHILD DEV, V57, P194, DOI 10.2307/1130651