Identifying patients with a cancer diagnosis using general practice medical records and Cancer Registry data

被引:25
作者
Pascoe, Shane W. [1 ]
Neal, Richard D. [2 ]
Heywood, Philip L. [3 ]
Allgar, Victoria L. [4 ]
Miles, Jeremy Nv [5 ]
Stefoski-Mikeljevic, Jasmina [6 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Ctr Primary Hlth Care & Equ, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
[2] Cardiff Univ, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, N Wales Clin Sch, Wrexham LL13 7YP, Wales
[3] Univ Leeds, Acad Unit Primary Care, Leeds Inst Hlth Sci, Leeds LS2 9JL, W Yorkshire, England
[4] Univ York, Hull York Med Sch, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[5] RAND Corp, Santa Monica, CA USA
[6] St James Univ Hosp, Canc Res UK Clin Ctr, Leeds LS9 7TF, W Yorkshire, England
关键词
primary care; cancer; medical records;
D O I
10.1093/fampra/cmn023
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. The medical records of patients with cancer need to accurately record diagnoses for professionals to provide quality care. Aims. (i) To develop a methodology which identifies medical records of patients with a cancer diagnosis. (ii) To describe the effectiveness of search strategies to identify all patients in primary care with a cancer diagnosis compared with a diagnosis identified by a Cancer Registry. Methods. The design of the study was a retrospective analysis of primary care medical records. Five general practices were recruited in the UK. The completeness and correctness of searches were measured and compared both within the practices and compared with a diagnosis identified by a Cancer Registry. Results. One in five of all primary care patients with cancer was not identified when a search for all patients with cancer was conducted using electronic codes for malignancy. One in five patient records with an electronic code for a malignancy that was confirmed by registration with the Cancer Registry actually lacked the necessary documentation to verify the cancer type, date of diagnosis or any other aspect of the malignant condition. Overall, electronic codes for cancer in these medical records have a poor level of completeness (29.4%) and correctness (65.6%) when compared with the Cancer Registry. Conclusions. The electronic codes in five general practices were not able to identify all patients on the practice lists with a cancer diagnosis. Practices will only be able to comply with guidelines and meet quality targets if they can identify all of their current patients with a cancer diagnosis and will require information from a Cancer Registry in order to do this.
引用
收藏
页码:215 / 220
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   General practictioners' management of cancer in England: secondary analysis of data from the National Survey of NHS Patients - Cancer [J].
Allgar, VL ;
Neal, RD .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER CARE, 2005, 14 (05) :409-416
[2]   Cross sectional study of performance indicators for English Primary Care Trusts: testing construct validity and identifying explanatory variables [J].
Brown, Celia ;
Lilford, Richard .
BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH, 2006, 6 (1)
[3]   Primary care oncology: essential if high quality cancer care is to be achieved for all [J].
Campbell, NC ;
MacLeod, U ;
Weller, D .
FAMILY PRACTICE, 2002, 19 (06) :577-578
[4]  
*DEP HLTH, 2006, 200607 DEP HLTH STAT
[5]  
*DEP HLTH, 2003, CANC REG
[6]  
Department of Health, 2000, NHS CANC PLAN
[7]   How complete and accurate are cancer registrations notified by the National Health Service Central Register for England and Wales? [J].
Dickinson, HO ;
Salotti, JA ;
Birch, PJ ;
Reid, MM ;
Malcolm, A ;
Parker, L .
JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY AND COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2001, 55 (06) :414-422
[8]   Pay-for-performance programs in family practices in the United Kingdom [J].
Doran, Tim ;
Fullwood, Catherine ;
Gravelle, Hugh ;
Reeves, David ;
Kontopantelis, Evangelos ;
Hiroeh, Urara ;
Roland, Martin .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2006, 355 (04) :375-384
[9]  
Dovey SM, 1996, BRIT J GEN PRACT, V46, P749
[10]  
Fleetcroft Robert, 2006, J Health Serv Res Policy, V11, P27, DOI 10.1258/135581906775094316