Modelling a community resilience index for urban flood-prone areas of Kerala, India (CRIF)

被引:13
作者
Ali, Sameer [1 ]
George, Abraham [1 ]
机构
[1] IIT Kharagpur, Dept Architecture & Planning, Kharagpur 721302, W Bengal, India
关键词
Multi-criteria decision analysis; Communities; Disaster mitigation; Empirical study; Validation; CLIMATE-RELATED DISASTERS; CHENNAI;
D O I
10.1007/s11069-022-05299-7
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Communities are ever-evolving, cities are constantly expanding, and the threat of natural hazards has escalated like never before. Cities can develop and prosper only if their society is resilient to external shocks. Measuring community resilience over time is crucial with the influence of technology and change in community lifestyles. With the frequent onset of floods in Kerala in recent years, the community must be well-prepared for future calamities. Thus, this paper develops a community resilience index for Kerala's urban flood-prone areas (CRIF) through a rigorous bottom-up approach. The criteria for the index were developed using multi-criteria decision analysis that covered a fuzzy Delphi study, an empirical study using multi-variate probit regression, and an AHP analysis. The fuzzy Delphi study selected seven criteria: 'social', 'economical', 'governance/political', 'health', 'communication/coordination, 'education', and 'infrastructure' from 65 experts. The empirical study helped apprehend the public's viewpoints under each criterion. Finally, the AHP analysis helped assign appropriate weights to the criteria which 28 experts designated. The index is also designed according to the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction (2015-2030). Further, the CRIF Index is put into action through a case study of the Kochi Municipal Corporation area, and the results are also validated using the Spearman's rank correlation coefficient method. Results from validation returned a value of 0.7209 for the perceived CRIF method and 0.5798 for the external validation method, which corresponds to a 'high' and 'moderate' correlation, respectively.
引用
收藏
页码:261 / 286
页数:26
相关论文
共 59 条
  • [1] Two sides of the same coin: Business resilience and community resilience
    Adekola, Josephine
    Clelland, David
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CONTINGENCIES AND CRISIS MANAGEMENT, 2020, 28 (01) : 50 - 60
  • [2] ALI S, 2021, NAT HAZARDS
  • [3] Ali S., 2021, SOCIAL INCLUSIVITY C, P109
  • [4] Ali Sameer., 2021, CONTIN RESIL REV, V3, P166, DOI [https://doi.org/10.1108/CRR-05-2021-0021, DOI 10.1108/CRR-05-2021-0021]
  • [5] Coastal community resilience frameworks for disaster risk management
    Almutairi, Arif
    Mourshed, Monjur
    Ameen, Raed Fawzi Mohammed
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2020, 101 (02) : 595 - 630
  • [6] Disaster community resilience assessment method: a consensus-based Delphi and AHP approach
    Alshehri, Saud Ali
    Rezgui, Yacine
    Li, Haijiang
    [J]. NATURAL HAZARDS, 2015, 78 (01) : 395 - 416
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2016, Resilience Index Measurement and Analysis-II
  • [8] Landslide risk perception, social vulnerability and community resilience: The case study of Maierato (Calabria, southern Italy)
    Antronico, Loredana
    De Pascale, Francesco
    Coscarelli, Roberto
    Gulla, Giovanni
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF DISASTER RISK REDUCTION, 2020, 46
  • [9] Social enterprise and community resilience: Examining a Greek response to turbulent times
    Apostolopoulos, Nikolaos
    Newbery, Robert
    Gkartzios, Menelaos
    [J]. JOURNAL OF RURAL STUDIES, 2019, 70 : 215 - 224
  • [10] Armstrong N., 2010, Homeland Security Affairs, V6, P1