Green infrastructure: The future of urban flood risk management?

被引:99
作者
Green, Daniel [1 ]
O'Donnell, Emily [2 ]
Johnson, Matthew [2 ]
Slater, Louise [3 ]
Thorne, Colin [2 ]
Zheng, Shan [4 ,5 ]
Stirling, Ross [1 ]
Chan, Faith K. S. [6 ]
Li, Lei [6 ]
Boothroyd, Richard J. [7 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Sch Engn, UKCRIC Natl Green Infrastruct Facil, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE4 5TG, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ Nottingham, Sch Geog, Nottingham, England
[3] Univ Oxford, Sch Geog & Environm, Oxford, England
[4] Wuhan Univ, State Key Lab Water Resources & Hydropower Engn S, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Wuhan Univ, Hubei Key Lab Water Syst Sci Sponge City Construc, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Nottingham Ningbo China, Sch Geog Sci, Ningbo, Peoples R China
[7] Univ Glasgow, Sch Geog & Earth Sci, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
green infrastructure; resilience; SUDS; sustainable drainage; urban flooding; water sensitive urban design; SUSTAINABLE DRAINAGE SYSTEMS; SEDIMENT TRANSPORT; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; WATER; STORMWATER; REDUCTION; CLIMATE; ADAPTATION; RESILIENCE; BENEFITS;
D O I
10.1002/wat2.1560
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Urban flooding is a key global challenge which is expected to become exacerbated under global change due to more intense rainfall and flashier runoff regimes over increasingly urban landscapes. Consequently, many cities are rethinking their approach to flood risk management by using green infrastructure (GI) solutions to reverse the legacy of hard engineering flood management approaches. The aim of GI is to attenuate, restore, and recreate a more natural flood response, bringing hydrological responses closer to pre-urbanized conditions. However, GI effectiveness is often difficult to determine, and depends on both the magnitude of storm events and the spatial scale of GI infrastructure. Monitoring of the successes and failures of GI schemes is not routinely conducted. Thus, it can be difficult to determine whether GI provides a sustainable solution to manage urban flooding. This article provides an international perspective on the current use of GI for urban flood mitigation and the solutions it offers in light of current and future challenges. An increasing body of literature further suggests that GI can be optimized alongside gray infrastructure to provide a holistic solution that delivers multiple co-benefits to the environment and society, while increasing flood resilience. GI will have to work synergistically with existing and upgraded gray infrastructure if urban flood risk is to be managed in a futureproof manner. Here, we discuss a series of priorities and challenges that must be overcome to enable integration of GI into existing stormwater management frameworks that effectively manage flood risk. This article is categorized under: Engineering Water > Sustainable Engineering of Water Engineering Water > Planning Water Science of Water > Water Extremes
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 123 条
[1]   Modelling the long-term suspended sedimentological effects on stormwater pond performance in an urban catchment [J].
Ahilan, Sangaralingam ;
Guan, Mingfu ;
Wright, Nigel ;
Sleigh, Andrew ;
Allen, Deonie ;
Arthur, Scott ;
Haynes, Heather ;
Krivtsov, Vladimir .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2019, 571 :805-818
[2]   Multiple rainfall event pollution transport by sustainable drainage systems: the fate of fine sediment pollution [J].
Allen, D. ;
Arthur, S. ;
Haynes, H. ;
Olive, V. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2017, 14 (03) :639-652
[3]   Urban Sediment Transport through an Established Vegetated Swale: Long Term Treatment Efficiencies and Deposition [J].
Allen, Deonie ;
Olive, Valerie ;
Arthur, Scott ;
Haynes, Heather .
WATER, 2015, 7 (03) :1046-1067
[4]   Assessing the Co-Benefits of green-blue-grey infrastructure for sustainable urban flood risk management [J].
Alves, Alida ;
Gersonius, Berry ;
Kapelan, Zoran ;
Vojinovic, Zoran ;
Sanchez, Arlex .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2019, 239 :244-254
[5]   Willingness-to-volunteer and stability of preferences between cities: Estimating the benefits of stormwater management [J].
Ando, Amy W. ;
Cadavid, Catalina Londono ;
Netusil, Noelwah R. ;
Parthum, Bryan .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL ECONOMICS AND MANAGEMENT, 2020, 99
[6]   Spatial Evaluation of Multiple Benefits to Encourage Multi-Functional Design of Sustainable Drainage in Blue-Green Cities [J].
Andrew, Richard Fenner .
WATER, 2017, 9 (12)
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, [No title captured]
[8]   Demonstrating and Monetizing the Multiple Benefits from Using SuDS [J].
Ashley, R. M. ;
Gersonius, B. ;
Digman, C. ;
Horton, B. ;
Bacchin, T. ;
Smith, B. ;
Shaffer, P. ;
Baylis, A. .
JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE WATER IN THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 4 (02)
[9]   Antifragility and the development of urban water infrastructure [J].
Babovic, Filip ;
Babovic, Vladan ;
Mijic, Ana .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES DEVELOPMENT, 2018, 34 (04) :499-509
[10]   Understanding urban neighborhood differences in willingness to implement green infrastructure measures: a case study of Syracuse, NY [J].
Baptiste, April Karen ;
Foley, Catherine ;
Smardon, Richard .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2015, 136 :1-12