To Be or Not to Be? The Implementation of the MPIA from the Perspective of the WTO Dispute Settlement

被引:0
作者
Hu, Jiaxiang [1 ]
Wang, Dapo [1 ]
机构
[1] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, 1954 Huashan Rd, Shanghai 200030, Peoples R China
来源
CHINA AND WTO REVIEW | 2021年 / 7卷 / 02期
关键词
MPIA; Arbitration; Appellate Review; Dispute Settlement; WTO;
D O I
10.14330/cwr.2021.7.2.01
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The EU, China, and other WTO members recently released their concluded MPIA with its Annexes I and II as a temporary arrangement to deal with the appeals of panel rulings before the Appellate Body resumes its operation. The WTO dispute settlement mechanism is a complete unit with unique features and inherent logic. Although this arrangement maintains the two-tier process with arbitration to replace the appellate review, there is a fundamental difference between them, which is embodied not only in the dispute settlement process but also in the implementation of the rulings. The challenges that the WTO dispute settlement mechanism encounters are not limited to those procedural issues, but they are also connected with the substantive rules, with which the procedural issues should be jointly resolved. This is the correct way to deal with the current challenges and to reform the multilateral trade regime.
引用
收藏
页码:239 / 267
页数:29
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2020, JOBDSB1ADD12 WTO
  • [2] [Anonymous], WTDS5169 WTO
  • [3] [Anonymous], Award of the Arbitrator, United StatesSection 110(5) of the US Copyright ActRecourse to Arbitration under Article 25 of the DSU
  • [4] [Anonymous], DSU CONSTITUTES ANNE
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1947, GEN AGREEMENT TARIFF
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1980, VIENN CONV LAW TREAT
  • [7] [Anonymous], Award by the Arbitrator, European Communities/ CanadaArticle XXVIII Rights
  • [8] [Anonymous], Chronological List of Disputes
  • [9] [Anonymous], 1994, MARRAKESH AGREEMENT
  • [10] [Anonymous], STAT COMES WTO WEBSI