A Fully Automatic Artificial Intelligence System Able to Detect and Characterize Prostate Cancer Using Multiparametric MRI: Multicenter and Multi-Scanner Validation

被引:20
作者
Giannini, Valentina [1 ,2 ]
Mazzetti, Simone [1 ,2 ]
Defeudis, Arianna [1 ,2 ]
Stranieri, Giuseppe [3 ]
Calandri, Marco [3 ,4 ]
Bollito, Enrico [5 ]
Bosco, Martino [6 ]
Porpiglia, Francesco [7 ]
Manfredi, Matteo [7 ]
De Pascale, Agostino [3 ]
Veltri, Andrea [3 ,4 ]
Russo, Filippo [1 ]
Regge, Daniele [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] IRCCS, Candiolo Canc Inst, Dept Radiol, FPO, Candiolo, Italy
[2] Univ Turin, Dept Surg Sci, Turin, Italy
[3] Azienda Osped Univ AOU San Luigi Gonzaga, Radiol Unit, Orbassano, Italy
[4] Univ Turin, Dept Oncol, Turin, Italy
[5] Univ Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hosp, Dept Pathol, Orbassano, Italy
[6] San Lazzaro Hosp, Dept Pathol, Alba, Italy
[7] Univ Turin, San Luigi Gonzaga Hosp, Dept Urol, Orbassano, Italy
来源
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY | 2021年 / 11卷
基金
欧盟地平线“2020”;
关键词
prostate cancer; artificial intelligence; automatic segmentation; aggressiveness score; external validation; magnetic resonance imaging; ISUP CONSENSUS CONFERENCE; COMPUTER-AIDED DIAGNOSIS; CLINICALLY SIGNIFICANT; INTERNATIONAL-SOCIETY; TEXTURE ANALYSIS; PARAMETRIC MRI; GLEASON SCORE; TUMOR VOLUME; FEATURES; GUIDELINES;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2021.718155
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
In the last years, the widespread use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) blood examination to triage patients who will enter the diagnostic/therapeutic path for prostate cancer (PCa) has almost halved PCa-specific mortality. As a counterpart, millions of men with clinically insignificant cancer not destined to cause death are treated, with no beneficial impact on overall survival. Therefore, there is a compelling need to develop tools that can help in stratifying patients according to their risk, to support physicians in the selection of the most appropriate treatment option for each individual patient. The aim of this study was to develop and validate on multivendor data a fully automated computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to detect and characterize PCas according to their aggressiveness. We propose a CAD system based on artificial intelligence algorithms that a) registers all images coming from different MRI sequences, b) provides candidates suspicious to be tumor, and c) provides an aggressiveness score of each candidate based on the results of a support vector machine classifier fed with radiomics features. The dataset was composed of 131 patients (149 tumors) from two different institutions that were divided in a training set, a narrow validation set, and an external validation set. The algorithm reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in distinguishing between low and high aggressive tumors of 0.96 and 0.81 on the training and validation sets, respectively. Moreover, when the output of the classifier was divided into three classes of risk, i.e., indolent, indeterminate, and aggressive, our method did not classify any aggressive tumor as indolent, meaning that, according to our score, all aggressive tumors would undergo treatment or further investigations. Our CAD performance is superior to that of previous studies and overcomes some of their limitations, such as the need to perform manual segmentation of the tumor or the fact that analysis is limited to single-center datasets. The results of this study are promising and could pave the way to a prediction tool for personalized decision making in patients harboring PCa.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
    Ahmed, Hashim U.
    Bosaily, Ahmed El-Shater
    Brown, Louise C.
    Gabe, Rhian
    Kaplan, Richard
    Parmar, Mahesh K.
    Collaco-Moraes, Yolanda
    Ward, Katie
    Hindley, Richard G.
    Freeman, Alex
    Kirkham, Alex P.
    Oldroyd, Robert
    Parker, Chris
    Emberton, Mark
    [J]. LANCET, 2017, 389 (10071) : 815 - 822
  • [2] Synopsis of the PI-RADS v2 Guidelines for Multiparametric Prostate Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Recommendations for Use
    Barentsz, Jelle O.
    Weinreb, Jeffrey C.
    Verma, Sadhna
    Thoeny, Harriet C.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Shtern, Faina
    Padhani, Anwar R.
    Margolis, Daniel
    Macura, Katarzyna J.
    Haider, Masoom A.
    Cornud, Francois
    Choyke, Peter L.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) : 41 - 49
  • [3] Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: Clinical challenges and applications
    Bi, Wenya Linda
    Hosny, Ahmed
    Schabath, Matthew B.
    Giger, Maryellen L.
    Birkbak, Nicolai J.
    Mehrtash, Alireza
    Allison, Tavis
    Arnaout, Omar
    Abbosh, Christopher
    Dunn, Ian F.
    Mak, Raymond H.
    Tamimi, Rulla M.
    Tempany, Clare M.
    Swanton, Charles
    Hoffmann, Udo
    Schwartz, Lawrence H.
    Gillies, Robert J.
    Huang, Raymond Y.
    Aerts, Hugo J. W. L.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2019, 69 (02) : 127 - 157
  • [4] Radiomic Machine Learning for Characterization of Prostate Lesions with MRI: Comparison to ADC Values
    Bonekamp, David
    Kohl, Simon
    Wiesenfarth, Manuel
    Schelb, Patrick
    Radtke, Jan Philipp
    Goetz, Michael
    Kickingereder, Philipp
    Yaqubi, Kaneschka
    Hitthaler, Bertram
    Gaehlert, Nils
    Kuder, Tristan Anselm
    Deister, Fenja
    Freitag, Martin
    Hohenfellner, Markus
    Hadaschik, Boris A.
    Schlemmer, Heinz-Peter
    Maier-Hein, Klaus H.
    [J]. RADIOLOGY, 2018, 289 (01) : 128 - 137
  • [5] Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer Patients Using Radiomic Analysis
    Chaddad, Ahmad
    Niazi, Tamim
    Probst, Stephan
    Bladou, Franck
    Anidjar, Maurice
    Bahoric, Boris
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2018, 8
  • [6] Population-Based Assessment of Determining Treatments for Prostate Cancer
    Chamie, Karim
    Williams, Stephen B.
    Hu, Jim C.
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2015, 1 (01) : 60 - 67
  • [7] Artificial intelligence and neural networks in urology: current clinical applications
    Checcucci, Enrico
    Autorino, Riccardo
    Cacciamani, Giovanni E.
    Amparore, Daniele
    De Cillis, Sabrina
    Piana, Alberto
    Piazzolla, Pietro
    Vezzetti, Enrico
    Fiori, Cristian
    Veneziano, Domenico
    Tewari, Ash
    Dasgupta, Prokar
    Hung, Andrew
    Gill, Inderbir
    Porpiglia, Francesco
    [J]. MINERVA UROLOGICA E NEFROLOGICA, 2020, 72 (01) : 49 - 57
  • [8] The value of diffusion-weighted imaging in the detection of prostate cancer: a meta-analysis
    Chen Jie
    Liu Rongbo
    Tan Ping
    [J]. EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2014, 24 (08) : 1929 - 1941
  • [9] Prostate Cancer Differentiation and Aggressiveness: Assessment With a Radiomic-Based Model vs. PI-RADS v2
    Chen, Tong
    Li, Mengjuan
    Gu, Yuefan
    Zhang, Yueyue
    Yang, Shuo
    Wei, Chaogang
    Wu, Jiangfen
    Li, Xin
    Zhao, Wenlu
    Shen, Junkang
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2019, 49 (03) : 875 - 884
  • [10] COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH
    DELONG, ER
    DELONG, DM
    CLARKEPEARSON, DI
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) : 837 - 845