Interlaminar versus Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injections for the Treatment of Symptomatic Lumbar Spinal Stenosis

被引:54
作者
Smith, Clark C. [1 ]
Booker, Thomas [4 ]
Schaufele, Michael K. [1 ,3 ]
Weiss, P. [2 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Rehabil Med, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Dept Biostat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[3] Emory Univ, Dept Orthoped, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[4] Crystal Run Healthcare LLP, Middletown, NJ USA
关键词
Epidural Injections; Radiculopathy; Spinal Stenosis; Rehabilitation; Pain; Spine; Injections;
D O I
10.1111/j.1526-4637.2010.00932.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background. Lumbar spinal stenosis is a common condition that causes axial low back pain, radicular pain, and neurogenic claudication. Epidural steroid injections are commonly used for the treatment of radicular symptoms and neurogenic claudication associated with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis. No prior study has evaluated whether transforaminal or interlaminar epidural steroid injections produce better clinical outcomes. Design. Retrospective case control study. Methods. For each technique, 19 patients were retrospectively identified who received their first fluoroscopically guided epidural steroid injection for radicular and neurogenic claudication symptoms caused by lumbar spinal stenosis over a 12-month interval. All patients had corresponding MRI findings and had failed previous non-invasive therapies. Outcomes included the visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10 scale) immediately before the injection, immediately after the injection, and upon follow up at 4-6 weeks. Surgery rates and number of repeat injections over a 3 year period were also analyzed. The patient groups were matched for age and level of stenosis on MRI. Results. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in pre injection to follow up VAS scores (P = 0.919). The difference between number of repeat injections between the interlaminar and transforaminal groups was not statistically significant (0.91-mean 2.47 and 2.58, respectively). Both the interlaminar and transforaminal groups experienced statistically significant improvement in VAS scores from before the injection to after the injection, and on follow up. Low numbers underwent surgery (11% in the interlaminar group vs 15% in the transforaminal group, not significant, P = 0.63). Conclusions. In the current study, neither transforaminal nor interlaminar steroid injections resulted in superior short term pain improvement or fewer long term surgical interventions or repeat injections when compared with each other.
引用
收藏
页码:1511 / 1515
页数:5
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]   Spinal stenosis - Surgical versus nonsurgical treatment [J].
Atlas, Steven J. ;
Delitto, Anthony .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2006, (443) :198-207
[2]  
BARRE LC, 2004, PAIN PHYSICIAN, V2, P187
[3]  
Boswell Mark V, 2007, Pain Physician, V10, P7
[4]   Epidural steroid injections in the treatment of symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis associated with epidural lipomatosis. [J].
Botwin, KP ;
Sakalkale, DP .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2004, 83 (12) :926-930
[5]   Fluoroscopically guided lumbar transforaminal epidural steroid injections in degenerative lumbar stenosis - An outcome study [J].
Botwin, KP ;
Gruber, RD ;
Bouchlas, CG ;
Torres-Ramos, FM ;
Sanelli, JT ;
Freeman, ED ;
Slaten, WK ;
Rao, S .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2002, 81 (12) :898-905
[6]   CAUDAL EPIDURAL BLOCKS FOR ELDERLY PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR CANAL STENOSIS [J].
CIOCON, JO ;
GALINDOCIOCON, D ;
AMARANATH, L ;
GALINDO, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 1994, 42 (06) :593-596
[7]   THE USE OF EPIDURAL STEROIDS IN THE TREATMENT OF LUMBAR RADICULAR PAIN - A PROSPECTIVE, RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY [J].
CUCKLER, JM ;
BERNINI, PA ;
WIESEL, SW ;
BOOTH, RE ;
ROTHMAN, RH ;
PICKENS, GT .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1985, 67A (01) :63-66
[8]   Symptoms of spinal stenosis do not improve after epidural steroid injection [J].
Fukusaki, M ;
Kobayashi, I ;
Hara, T ;
Sumikawa, K .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1998, 14 (02) :148-151
[9]   THE NATURAL COURSE OF LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS [J].
JOHNSSON, KE ;
ROSEN, I ;
UDEN, A .
ACTA ORTHOPAEDICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 64 :67-68
[10]   Diagnosis and conservative management of degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis [J].
Kalichman, Leonid ;
Hunter, David J. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2008, 17 (03) :327-335