Context-dependent preferences in wild fruit bats

被引:6
作者
Hemingway, Claire T. [1 ,2 ]
Aversa, Jack C., III [2 ]
Ryan, Michael J. [1 ,2 ]
Page, Rachel A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Austin, Dept Integrat Biol, Austin, TX 78712 USA
[2] Smithsonian Trop Res Inst, Balboa, Ancon, Panama
关键词
decoy effect; economic rationality; foraging; fruit bat; DECISION-MAKING; RATIONAL CHOICE; PAPAYA FRUIT; VIOLATIONS; MEMORY; SELECTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.anbehav.2021.06.016
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
In models of choice, animals are expected to evaluate options in absolute terms and assign some fitness related value to different options. These expectations are similar to those of economic rationality, and both predict consistent decisions across variable contexts. Evidence from humans and other animals suggests that decision-making mechanisms can lead to context-dependent choices, which are considered economically irrational. While there is widespread evidence that these mechanisms may influence animal decision making, we can now explore how the presence and degree of these biases may arise in different animals based on their taxonomy and ecology. Here, we investigated context-dependent decisions in wild Jamaican fruit bats, Artibeus jamaicensis. We found that bats were sensitive to the context of the choice, showing shifts in preference upon the addition of an irrelevant decoy option. These results contrast previous findings in a close relative, the frog-eating bat, Trachops cirrhosus, indicating that diet may play a critical role in these behaviours. We argue that comparative studies exploring the role of diet on these decision-making biases are critical for understanding how animals make foraging decisions in the wild. (c) 2021 The Association for the Study of Animal Behaviour. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:65 / 72
页数:8
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [21] Luce D. R., 1959, INDIVIDUAL CHOICE BE
  • [22] Secondary metabolites in a neotropical shrub: spatiotemporal allocation and role in fruit defense and dispersal
    Maynard, Lauren D.
    Slinn, Heather L.
    Glassmire, Andrea E.
    Matarrita-Carranza, Bernal
    Dodson, Craig D.
    Trang T Nguyen
    Burroughs, Megan J.
    Dyer, Lee A.
    Jeffrey, Christopher S.
    Whitehead, Susan R.
    [J]. ECOLOGY, 2020, 101 (12)
  • [23] Starlings uphold principles of economic rationality for delay and probability of reward
    Monteiro, Tiago
    Vasconcelos, Marco
    Kacelnik, Alex
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2013, 280 (1756)
  • [24] Examining models of nondominated decoy effects across judgment and choice
    Pettibone, JC
    Wedell, DH
    [J]. ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 2000, 81 (02) : 300 - 328
  • [25] Context-dependent utility overrides absolute memory as a determinant of choice
    Pompilio, Lorena
    Kacelnik, Alex
    [J]. PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2010, 107 (01) : 508 - 512
  • [26] On the variety of methods for calculating confidence intervals by bootstrapping
    Puth, Marie-Therese
    Neuhaeuser, Markus
    Ruxton, Graeme D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANIMAL ECOLOGY, 2015, 84 (04) : 892 - 897
  • [27] An exception to the rule: common vampire bats do not learn taste aversions
    Ratcliffe, JM
    Fenton, MB
    Galef, BG
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2003, 65 : 385 - 389
  • [28] Context-dependent preferences vary by multicomponent signals in a swordtail
    Reding, Luke
    Cummings, Molly E.
    [J]. ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR, 2017, 129 : 237 - 247
  • [29] Principles of Economic Rationality in Mice
    Rivalan, Marion
    Winter, York
    Nachev, Vladislav
    [J]. SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2017, 7
  • [30] State-dependent decisions cause apparent violations of rationality in animal choice
    Schuck-Paim, C
    Pompilio, L
    Kacelnik, A
    [J]. PLOS BIOLOGY, 2004, 2 (12) : 2305 - 2315