Cognitive and behavioural bias in advance care planning

被引:4
作者
Whyte, Stephen [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Rego, Joanna [4 ]
Fai Chan, Ho [2 ,5 ]
Chan, Raymond J. [6 ,7 ,8 ]
Yates, Patsy [4 ]
Dulleck, Uwe [1 ,2 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Queensland Univ Technol QUT, Sch Econ & Finance, 2 George St, Brisbane, Qld 4001, Australia
[2] Queensland Univ Technol QUT, Ctr Behav Econ Soc & Technol BEST, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[3] Queensland Univ Technol QUT, Ctr Regenerat Med, Kelvin Grove, Qld, Australia
[4] Queensland Univ Technol QUT, Canc & Palliat Care Outcomes Ctr, Kelvin Grove, Kelvin Grove, Qld, Australia
[5] Queensland Univ Technol QUT, Sch Econ & Finance, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[6] Flinders Univ S Australia, Caring Futures Inst, Bedford Pk, SA, Australia
[7] Queensland Univ Technol, Metro South Hlth, Princess Alexandra Hosp, Sch Nursing, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[8] Queensland Univ Technol, Canc & Palliat Care Outcomes Ctr, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
[9] Queensland Univ Technol QUT, ARC Training Ctr Cell & Tissue Engn Technol, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
来源
PALLIATIVE CARE & SOCIAL PRACTICE | 2022年 / 16卷
关键词
advance care planning; cognitive bias; end of life; framing; shared decision-making; LIFE; END; PREFERENCES; KNOWLEDGE;
D O I
10.1177/26323524221092458
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: We explore cognitive and behavioural biases that influence individual's willingness to engage advance care planning (ACP). Because contexts for the initiation of ACP discussions can be so different, our objective in this study was to identify specific groups, particular preferences or uniform behaviours, that may be prone to cognitive bias in the ACP decision process.Method: We collected data from the Australian general public (n = 1253), as well as general practitioners (GPs) and nurses (n = 117) including demographics, stated preference for ACP decision-making; six cognitive bias tests commonly used in Behavioural Economics; and a framing experiment in the context of ACP.Results: Compared to GPs (M = 57.6 years, SD = 17.2) and the general public (58.1 years, SD = 14.56), nurses on average recommend ACP discussions with patients occur approximately 15 years earlier (M = 42.9 years, SD = 23.1; p < 0.0001 in both cases). There is a positive correlation between the age of the general population and the preferred age for the initial ACP discussion (rho = 0.368, p < 0.001). Our shared decision-making analysis shows the mean share of doctor's ACP input is viewed to be approximately 40% by the general public, significantly higher than health professionals (GPs and nurses), who believe doctors should only contribute approximately 20% input. The general public show varying relationships (all p < 0.05) for both first ACP discussion, and shared decision-making for five of six cognitive tests. However, for health professionals, only those who exhibit confirmation bias show differences (8.4% higher; p = 0.035) of patient's input. Our framing experiment results show that positive versus negative framing can result in as much as 4.9-7.0% shift in preference for factors most relevant to ACP uptake.Conclusion: Understanding how GPs, nurses and patients perceive, engage and choose to communicate ACP and how specific groups, particular preferences or uniform behaviours, may be prone to cognitive bias in the decision process is of critical importance for increasing future uptake and efficient future healthcare provision.
引用
收藏
页数:26
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   The effects of advance care planning on end-of-life care: A systematic review [J].
Brinkman-Stoppelenburg, Arianne ;
Rietjens, Judith A. C. ;
van der Heide, Agnes .
PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2014, 28 (08) :1000-1025
[2]  
Drought Theresa S, 2002, Gerontologist, V42 Spec No 3, P114
[3]  
Dumont Isabelle, 2009, Palliat Support Care, V7, P163, DOI 10.1017/S1478951509000212
[4]   Failure to Engage Hospitalized Elderly Patients and Their Families in Advance Care Planning [J].
Heyland, Daren K. ;
Barwich, Doris ;
Pichora, Deb ;
Dodek, Peter ;
Lamontagne, Francois ;
You, John J. ;
Tayler, Carolyn ;
Porterfield, Pat ;
Sinuff, Tasnim ;
Simon, Jessica .
JAMA INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2013, 173 (09) :778-787
[5]   Efficacy of Advance Care Planning: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [J].
Houben, Carmen H. M. ;
Spruit, Martijn A. ;
Groenen, Miriam T. J. ;
Wouters, Emiel F. M. ;
Janssen, Daisy J. A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL DIRECTORS ASSOCIATION, 2014, 15 (07) :477-489
[6]  
Kahneman Daniel., 2011, THINKING FAST SLOW
[7]   Decisional autonomy undermines advisees' judgments of experts in medicine and in life [J].
Kassirer, Samantha ;
Levine, Emma E. ;
Gaertig, Celia .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 2020, 117 (21) :11368-11378
[8]   Knowledge regarding advance care planning: A systematic review [J].
Kermel-Schiffman, Ile ;
Werner, Perla .
ARCHIVES OF GERONTOLOGY AND GERIATRICS, 2017, 73 :133-142
[9]   Advance Care Planning in the Elderly [J].
Lum, Hillary D. ;
Sudore, Rebecca L. ;
Bekelman, David B. .
MEDICAL CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2015, 99 (02) :391-+