Impact of simulated light scatter on the quantitative, noninvasive assessment of retinal arteriolar hemodynamics

被引:6
作者
Azizi, Behrooz
Buehler, Heike
Venkataraman, Sublia T.
Hudson, Chris [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Sch Optometry, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Retina Res Grp, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
retinal blood flow; Canon laser blood flowmeter; light scatter; densitometry; vessel diameter;
D O I
10.1117/1.2750292
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
We determine the impact of artificial light scatter on quantitative, noninvasive assessment of retinal arteriolar hemodynamics. One eye from each of 10 healthy young subjects between the ages 18 and 30 (23.6 +/- 3.4) is randomly selected. To simulate light scatter, cells comprising a plastic collar and two plano lenses are filled with solutions of differing concentration of polystyrene microspheres (Poly-sciences Inc., USA). We prepare 0.002, 0.004, 0.006, and 0.008% microsphere concentrations as well as distilled water only. The Canon laser blood flowmeter (CLBF) is used to noninvasively assess retinal arteriolar blood flow. After a preliminary screening to confirm subject eligibility, seven arteriolar blood flow measurements are taken by randomly placing the cells between the instrument objective lens and the subjects' cornea. To achieve a baseline, subjects are first imaged with no cell in place. Both low- and high-intensity CLBF laser settings are assessed. Our light scatter model results in an artifactual increase of retinal arteriolar diameter (p<0.0001) and thereby increased retinal blood flow (p<0.0001). The 0.006 and 0.008% microsphere concentrations produce significantly higher diameter and flow values than baseline. Centerline blood velocity, however, is not affected by light scatter. Retinal arteriolar diameter values are significantly less with the high-intensity laser than with the low-intensity laser (p =0.0007). Densitometry assessment of vessel diameter is increasingly impacted as the magnitude of artificial light scatter increases; this effect can be partially negated by increasing laser intensity. A cataract is an inevitable consequence of aging and, therefore, care must be exercised in the interpretation of studies of retinal vessel diameter that use similar densitometry techniques. (C) 2007 Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   Bowman Lecture 1998 - Diabetic retinopathy: some cellular, molecular and therapeutic considerations [J].
Archer, DB .
EYE, 1999, 13 (4) :497-523
[2]   The impact of artificial light scatter on scanning laser tomography [J].
Burke, MA ;
Khanna, CJ ;
Miller, A ;
Venkataraman, ST ;
Hudson, C .
OPTOMETRY AND VISION SCIENCE, 2006, 83 (04) :222-227
[3]  
*CAN INC, 2005, CLBF DIAM READ SYST
[4]   LASER BASED INSTRUMENTS FOR OCULAR BLOOD FLOW ASSESSMENT [J].
Feke, Gilbert T. ;
Yoshida, Akitoshi ;
Schepens, Charles L. .
JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL OPTICS, 1998, 3 (04) :415-422
[5]   LASER DOPPLER TECHNIQUE FOR ABSOLUTE MEASUREMENT OF BLOOD SPEED IN RETINAL-VESSELS [J].
FEKE, GT ;
GOGER, DG ;
TAGAWA, H ;
DELORI, FC .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1987, 34 (09) :673-680
[6]  
Geiser M, 2003, AM J OPHTHALMOL, V136, P583, DOI 10.1016/S0002-9394(03)00441-0
[7]   Retinal arteriolar diameter, blood velocity, and blood flow response to an isocapnic hyperoxic provocation [J].
Gilmore, ED ;
Hudson, C ;
Preiss, D ;
Fisher, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-HEART AND CIRCULATORY PHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 288 (06) :H2912-H2917
[8]   Retinal Hemodynamics in early diabetic macular edema [J].
Guan, K ;
Hudson, C ;
Wong, T ;
Kisilevsky, M ;
Nrusimhadevara, RK ;
Lam, WC ;
Mandelcorn, M ;
Devenyi, RG ;
Flanagan, JG .
DIABETES, 2006, 55 (03) :813-818
[9]   Variability and repeatability of retinal blood flow measurements using the Canon Laser Blood Flowmeter [J].
Guan, K ;
Hudson, C ;
Flanagan, JG .
MICROVASCULAR RESEARCH, 2003, 65 (03) :145-151
[10]   Assessment of human ocular hemodynamics [J].
Harris, A ;
Kagemann, L ;
Cioffi, GA .
SURVEY OF OPHTHALMOLOGY, 1998, 42 (06) :509-533