Management diversification increases habitat availability for multiple biodiversity indicator species in production forests

被引:15
作者
Duflot, R. [1 ,2 ]
Eyvindson, K. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Monkkonen, M. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Biol & Environm Sci, POB 35, FI-40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Sch Resource Wisdom, POB 35, FI-40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland
[3] Norwegian Univ Life Sci, Fac Environm Sci & Nat Resource Management, POB 5003, NO-1432 As, Norway
关键词
Heterogeneity; Biodiversity conservation; Landscape planning; Forest management; Sustainable management; Boreal forest; Temperate forest; CONTINUOUS COVER FORESTRY; WOOD-INHABITING FUNGI; ROTATION LENGTHS; BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY; NATURAL DISTURBANCES; RETENTION FORESTRY; FLYING SQUIRREL; NORTHERN EUROPE; TREE RETENTION; BOREAL FORESTS;
D O I
10.1007/s10980-021-01375-8
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Context Forest biodiversity is closely linked to habitat heterogeneity, while forestry actions often cause habitat homogenization. Alternative approaches to even-aged management were developed to restore habitat heterogeneity at the stand level, but how their application could promote habitat diversity at landscape scale remains uncertain. Objectives We tested the potential benefit of diversifying management regimes to increase landscapelevel heterogeneity. We hypothesize that different styles of forest management would create a diverse mosaic of forest habitats that would in turn benefit species with various habitat requirements. Methods Forest stands were simulated under business-as-usual management, set-aside (no management) and 12 alternative management regimes. We created virtual landscapes following diversification scenarios to (i) compare the individual performance of management regimes (no diversification), and (ii) test for the management diversification hypothesis at different levels of set-aside. For each virtual landscape, we evaluated habitat availability of six biodiversity indicator species, multispecies habitat availability, and economic values of production. Results Each indicator species responded differently to management regimes, with no single regime being optimal for all species at the same time. Management diversification led to a 30% gain in multispecies habitat availability, relative to business-as-usual management. By selecting a subset of five alternative management regimes with high potential for biodiversity, gains can reach 50%. Conclusions Various alternative management regimes offer diverse habitats for different biodiversity indicator species. Management diversification can yield large gains in multispecies habitat availability with no or low economic cost, providing a potential cost-effective biodiversity tool if the management regimes are thoughtfully selected.
引用
收藏
页码:443 / 459
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] Aijala O, 2019, Metsanhoidon suositukset
  • [2] Angelstam P., 1992, Ecological Principles of Nature Conservation, P9, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-1-4615-3524-9_2
  • [3] Angelstam Per, 2004, Ecological Bulletins, V51, P487
  • [4] Maintaining and restoring biodiversity in European boreal forests by developing natural disturbance regimes
    Angelstam, PK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 1998, 9 (04) : 593 - 602
  • [5] The spatial distribution of birds and carabid beetles in pine plantation forests: the role of landscape composition and structure
    Barbaro, Luc
    Rossi, Jean-Pierre
    Vetillard, Fabrice
    Nezan, Julien
    Jactel, Herve
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOGEOGRAPHY, 2007, 34 (04) : 652 - 664
  • [6] Biodiversity, disturbances, ecosystem function and management of European forests
    Bengtsson, J
    Nilsson, SG
    Franc, A
    Menozzi, P
    [J]. FOREST ECOLOGY AND MANAGEMENT, 2000, 132 (01) : 39 - 50
  • [7] The effects of windthrow on forest insect communities: a literature review
    Bouget, C
    Duelli, P
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2004, 118 (03) : 281 - 299
  • [8] Key features for saproxylic beetle diversity derived from rapid habitat assessment in temperate forests
    Bouget, C.
    Larrieu, L.
    Brin, A.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2014, 36 : 656 - 664
  • [9] High boreal forest multifunctionality requires continuous cover forestry as a dominant management
    Eyvindson, Kyle
    Duflot, Remi
    Trivino, Maria
    Blattert, Clemens
    Potterf, Maria
    Moenkkoenen, Mikko
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2021, 100
  • [10] Mitigating forest biodiversity and ecosystem service losses in the era of bio-based economy
    Eyvindson, Kyle
    Repo, Anna
    Monkkonen, Mikko
    [J]. FOREST POLICY AND ECONOMICS, 2018, 92 : 119 - 127