Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 2D and 3D measurements to determine opportunistic screening of osteoporosis using the proximal femur on abdomen-pelvic CT

被引:6
作者
Park, Sun-Young [1 ]
Ha, Hong Il [1 ]
Lee, Sang Min [1 ]
Lee, In Jae [1 ]
Lim, Hyun Kyung [2 ]
机构
[1] Hallym Univ, Sacred Heart Hosp, Dept Radiol, Anyang Si, Gyeonggi Do, South Korea
[2] Soonchunhyang Univ, Seoul Hosp, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
来源
PLOS ONE | 2022年 / 17卷 / 01期
关键词
BONE-MINERAL DENSITY; ROUTINE ABDOMINAL CT; X-RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; COMPUTED-TOMOGRAPHY; FRACTURE RISK; FEMORAL-NECK; DXA; HIP; CONTRAST; SEGMENTATION;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0262025
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Objectives To compare the osteoporosis-predicting ability of computed tomography (CT) indexes in abdomen-pelvic CT using the proximal femur and the reliability of measurements in two- and three-dimensional analyses. Methods Four hundred thirty female patients (age range, 50-96 years) who underwent dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry and abdominal-pelvic CT within 1 month were retrospectively selected. The volumes of interest (VOIs) from the femoral head to the lesser trochanter and the femoral neck were expressed as 3D(Femur). Round regions of interest (ROIs) of image plane drawn over the femoral neck touching the outer cortex were determined as 2D(coronal). In HU histogram analysis (HUHA), the percentages of HU histogram ranges related to the ROI or VOI were classified as HUHA(Fat) (<0 HU) and HUHA(Bone) (126 HU <=). Diagnostic performance, correlation analysis and measurement reliability were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic curves, correlation coefficient and interobserver correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Results AUCs of each HUHA and mean-HU measurement on 2D-ROI and 3D-VOI were 0.94 or higher (P < 0.001). Both 3D(Femur)-Mean-HU and 3D(Femur)-HUHA(Bone) showed the highest AUC (0.96). The cut-off value of 3D(Femur)-Mean-HU was 231HU or less, (sensitivity: 94.8%; specificity: 85.0%; correlation coefficient: -0.65; P<0.001) for diagnosis of osteoporosis. There was no superiority between AUCs in 2D-ROI and 3D-VOI measurements (P>0.05). Reliability of the 3D-VOI measurement showed perfect agreement (ICC >= 0.94), and 2D-ROI showed moderate to good agreement (ICC range: 0.63 similar to 0.84). Conclusions CT indexes on 3D-VOI for predicting femoral osteoporosis showed similar diagnostic accuracy with better reproducibility of measurement, compared with 2D-ROI.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis by routine CT in Southern Europe [J].
Alacreu, Elena ;
Moratal, David ;
Arana, Estanislao .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2017, 28 (03) :983-990
[2]   The use of "overall accuracy" to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests [J].
Alberg, AJ ;
Park, JW ;
Hager, BW ;
Brock, MV ;
Diener-West, M .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 19 (05) :460-465
[3]   STATISTICS NOTES - DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-1 - SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY .3. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6943) :1552-1552
[4]   DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-2 - PREDICTIVE VALUES .4. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 309 (6947) :102-102
[5]   Underuse and Overuse of Osteoporosis Screening in a Regional Health System: a Retrospective Cohort Study [J].
Amarnath, Anna Lee D. ;
Franks, Peter ;
Robbins, John A. ;
Xing, Guibo ;
Fenton, Joshua J. .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2015, 30 (12) :1733-1740
[6]   Osteoporosis and fracture risk in women of different ethnic groups [J].
Barrett-Connor, E ;
Siris, ES ;
Wehren, LE ;
Miller, PD ;
Abbott, TA ;
Berger, ML ;
Santora, AC ;
Sherwood, LM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2005, 20 (02) :185-194
[7]   Opportunistic screening for osteoporosis on routine computed tomography? An external validation study [J].
Buckens, Constantinus F. ;
Dijkhuis, Gawein ;
de Keizer, Bart ;
Verhaar, Harald J. ;
de Jong, Pim A. .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (07) :2074-2079
[8]  
Curtis JR, 2008, J BONE MINER RES, V23, P1061, DOI [10.1359/jbmr.080232, 10.1359/JBMR.080232]
[9]   COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[10]   Use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) for diagnosis and fracture risk assessment; WHO-criteria, T- and Z-score, and reference databases [J].
Dimai, Hans P. .
BONE, 2017, 104 :39-43