Investigating Mental Health Service User Opinions on Clinical Data Sharing: Qualitative Focus Group Study

被引:6
作者
Adanijo, Abimbola [1 ,2 ]
McWilliams, Caoimhe [1 ,2 ]
Wykes, Til [1 ,2 ]
Jilka, Sagar [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Dept Psychol, Henry Wellcome Bldg,De Crespigny Pk, London SE5 8AF, England
[2] South London & Maudsley NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[3] Univ Warwick, Warwick Med Sch, Div Mental Hlth & Wellbeing, Coventry, W Midlands, England
来源
JMIR MENTAL HEALTH | 2021年 / 8卷 / 09期
关键词
clinical data; data sharing; mental health data; service users; focus groups; mental health; digital health; health records; EXPERIENCES; CARE; TECHNOLOGY; EPILEPSY; PATIENT; PEOPLE; VIEWS;
D O I
10.2196/30596
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Sharing patient data can help drive scientific advances and improve patient care, but service users are concerned about how their data are used. When the National Health Service proposes to scrape general practitioner records, it is very important that we understand these concerns in some depth. Objective: This study aims to investigate views of mental health service users on acceptable data sharing to provide clear recommendations for future data sharing systems. Methods: A total of 4 focus groups with 4 member-checking groups were conducted via the internet between October 2020 and March 2021, with a total of 22 service users in the United Kingdom. Thematic analysis was used to identify the themes. Results: Six main themes, with several subthemes were identified, such as the purpose of data sharing-for profit, public good, and continuation of care; discrimination through the misattribution of physical symptoms to mental health conditions (ie, diagnostic overshadowing) alongside the discrimination of individuals or groups within society (ie, institutional discrimination); safeguarding data by preserving anonymity and confidentiality, strengthening security measures, and holding organizations accountable; data accuracy and informed consent-increasing transparency about data use and choice; and incorporating service user involvement in system governance to provide insight and increase security. Conclusions: This study extends the limited research on the views and concerns of mental health service users regarding acceptable data sharing. If adopted, the recommendations should improve the confidence of service users in sharing their data. The five recommendations include screening to ensure that data sharing benefits the public, providing service users with information about how their data are shared and what for, highlighting the existing safeguarding procedures, incorporating service user involvement, and developing tailored training for health care professionals to address issues of diagnostic overshadowing and inaccurate health records. Adopting such systems would aid in data sharing for legitimate interests that will benefit patients and the National Health Service.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Insurance Customers' Expectations for Sharing Health Data: Qualitative Survey Study
    Grundstrom, Casandra
    Korhonen, Olli
    Vayrynen, Karin
    Isomursu, Minna
    JMIR MEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2020, 8 (03)
  • [42] Illness careers and continuity of care in mental health services: A qualitative study of service users and carers
    Jones, Ian Rees
    Ahmed, Nilufar
    Catty, Jocelyn
    McLaren, Susan
    Rose, Diana
    Wykes, Til
    Burns, Tom
    SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2009, 69 (04) : 632 - 639
  • [43] Service user perspectives of multiagency working: a qualitative study with children with educational and mental health difficulties and their parents
    O'Reilly, Michelle
    Vostanis, Panos
    Taylor, Helen
    Day, Crispin
    Street, Cathy
    Wolpert, Miranda
    CHILD AND ADOLESCENT MENTAL HEALTH, 2013, 18 (04) : 202 - 209
  • [44] Incorporating Community Partner Perspectives on eHealth Technology Data Sharing Practices for the California Early Psychosis Intervention Network: Qualitative Focus Group Study With a User-Centered Design Approach
    Tully, Laura M.
    Nye, Kathleen E.
    Ereshefsky, Sabrina
    Tryon, Valerie L.
    Hakusui, Christopher Komei
    Savill, Mark
    Niendam, Tara A.
    JMIR HUMAN FACTORS, 2023, 10
  • [45] A qualitative exploration of mental health service user and carer perspectives on safety issues in UK mental health services
    Berzins, Kathryn
    Baker, John
    Louch, Gemma
    Albutt, Abigail
    HEALTH EXPECTATIONS, 2020, 23 (03) : 549 - 560
  • [46] OPINIONS OF TURKISH SOCIETY ON PHYSIOTHERAPIST CONSULTANCY FOR MATTRESS SELECTION: A QUALITATIVE FOCUS GROUP STUDY
    Turkmen, Ceyhun
    Duger, Tulin
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF PHYSIOTHERAPY REHABILITATION-TURK FIZYOTERAPI VE REHABILITASYON DERGISI, 2023, 34 (03): : 321 - 328
  • [47] University Students' Perceptions of Links Between Substance Use and Mental Health A Qualitative Focus Group Study
    Hudson, Amanda
    Thompson, Kara
    MacNevin, Parnell D.
    Ivany, Meredith
    Teehan, Michael
    Stuart, Heather
    Stewart, Sherry H.
    EMERGING ADULTHOOD, 2018, 6 (06) : 399 - 410
  • [48] Embedding an exercise professional within an inpatient mental health service: A qualitative study
    Fibbins, Hamish
    Ward, Philip B.
    Stanton, Robert
    Czsonek, Louise
    Cudmore, Jeanette
    Michael, Sarah
    Steel, Zachary
    Rosenbaum, Simon
    MENTAL HEALTH AND PHYSICAL ACTIVITY, 2019, 17
  • [49] Service user involvement in clinical guideline development and implementation: Learning from mental health service users in the UK
    Harding, Emma
    Pettinari, Catherine Johnson
    Brown, Dora
    Hayward, Mark
    Taylor, Clare
    INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF PSYCHIATRY, 2011, 23 (04) : 352 - 357
  • [50] User-defined outcomes in mental health: A qualitative study and consensus development exercise
    Perry, Alex
    Gilbody, Simon
    JOURNAL OF MENTAL HEALTH, 2009, 18 (05) : 415 - 423