The Intricate Interplay of Spatial Attention and Expectation: a Multisensory Perspective

被引:12
作者
Zuanazzi, Arianna [1 ,2 ]
Noppeney, Uta [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Computat Neurosci & Cognit Robot Ctr, Birmingham, W Midlands, England
[2] NYU, Dept Psychol, 6 Washington Pl, New York, NY 10003 USA
[3] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Donders Inst Brain Cognit & Behav, Nijmegen, Netherlands
基金
欧洲研究理事会;
关键词
Audition; attention; expectation; fMRI; multisensory; perceptual decisions; space; vision; CROSS-MODAL LINKS; HUMAN VISUAL-CORTEX; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; TARGET DETECTION; PARIETAL CORTEX; INTERMODAL ATTENTION; PREPARATORY STATES; DIRECTED ATTENTION; PREDICTION ERRORS; NEURAL MECHANISMS;
D O I
10.1163/22134808-20201482
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Attention (i.e., task relevance) and expectation (i.e., signal probability) are two critical top-down mechanisms guiding perceptual inference. Attention prioritizes processing of information that is relevant for observers' current goals. Prior expectations encode the statistical structure of the environment. Research to date has mostly conflated spatial attention and expectation. Most notably, the Posner cueing paradigm manipulates spatial attention using probabilistic cues that indicate where the subsequent stimulus is likely to be presented. Only recently have studies attempted to dissociate the mechanisms of attention and expectation and characterized their interactive (i.e., synergistic) or additive influences on perception. In this review, we will first discuss methodological challenges that are involved in dissociating the mechanisms of attention and expectation. Second, we will review research that was designed to dissociate attention and expectation in the unisensory domain. Third, we will review the broad field of crossmodal endogenous and exogenous spatial attention that investigates the impact of attention across the senses. This raises the critical question of whether attention relies on amodal or modality-specific mechanisms. Fourth, we will discuss recent studies investigating the role of both spatial attention and expectation in multisensory perception, where the brain constructs a representation of the environment based on multiple sensory inputs. We conclude that spatial attention and expectation are closely intertwined in almost all circumstances of everyday life. Yet, despite their intimate relationship, attention and expectation rely on partly distinct neural mechanisms: while attentional resources are mainly shared across the senses, expectations can be formed in a modality-specific fashion.
引用
收藏
页码:383 / 416
页数:34
相关论文
共 137 条
[51]   Bayesian surprise attracts human attention [J].
Itti, Laurent ;
Baldi, Pierre .
VISION RESEARCH, 2009, 49 (10) :1295-1306
[52]   Attention Sharpens the Distinction between Expected and Unexpected Percepts in the Visual Brain [J].
Jiang, Jiefeng ;
Summerfield, Christopher ;
Egner, Tobias .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2013, 33 (47) :18438-18447
[53]   Mechanisms of visual attention in the human cortex [J].
Kastner, S ;
Ungerleider, LG .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2000, 23 :315-341
[54]   Mechanisms of directed attention in the human extrastriate cortex as revealed by functional MRI [J].
Kastner, S ;
De Weerd, P ;
Desimone, R ;
Ungerleider, LC .
SCIENCE, 1998, 282 (5386) :108-111
[55]   Increased activity in human visual cortex during directed attention in the absence of visual stimulation [J].
Kastner, S ;
Pinsk, MA ;
De Weerd, P ;
Desimone, R ;
Ungerleider, LG .
NEURON, 1999, 22 (04) :751-761
[56]   Tactile-visual links in exogenous spatial attention under different postures: Convergent evidence from psychophysics and ERPs [J].
Kennett, S ;
Eimer, M ;
Spence, C ;
Driver, J .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2001, 13 (04) :462-478
[57]   Time-varying cortical activations related to visual-tactile cross-modal links in spatial selective attention [J].
Kida, Tetsuo ;
Inui, Koji ;
Wasaka, Toshiaki ;
Akatsuka, Kosuke ;
Tanaka, Emi ;
Kakigi, Ryusuke .
JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 97 (05) :3585-3596
[58]   An event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging study of voluntary and stimulus-driven orienting of attention [J].
Kincade, JM ;
Abrams, RA ;
Astafiev, SV ;
Shulman, GL ;
Corbetta, M .
JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 25 (18) :4593-4604
[59]   Attention Reverses the Effect of Prediction in Silencing Sensory Signals [J].
Kok, Peter ;
Rahnev, Dobromir ;
Jehee, Janneke F. M. ;
Lau, Hakwan C. ;
de Lange, Floris P. .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2012, 22 (09) :2197-2206
[60]   Executive Control of Spatial Attention Shifts in the Auditory Compared to the Visual Modality [J].
Krumbholz, Katrin ;
Nobis, Esther A. ;
Weatheritt, Robert J. ;
Fink, Gereon R. .
HUMAN BRAIN MAPPING, 2009, 30 (05) :1457-1469