Publics administration and the ethics of particularity

被引:11
作者
Brady, FN [1 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Romney Inst Publ Management, Provo, UT 84602 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/1540-6210.00316
中图分类号
C93 [管理学]; D035 [国家行政管理]; D523 [行政管理]; D63 [国家行政管理];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ; 1204 ; 120401 ;
摘要
Ethical orientations that emphasize universal duties, ideals, and values are well known to public administrators. We pay attention to principle, policy, ideals, shared goals, and the provision of a variety of commonly held values, such as clean air and water, mosquito abatement, and public recreation. The word "public" often seems to be a synonym for "universal." However, this article explores particularity in ethics, especially as it applies to the life of the public servant. It identifies three distinct orientations that focus on the concrete-as opposed to the abstract-and it shows how the exceptional cases are not administrative problems; rather they provide a reality check for public administrators who suppose rules, plans, and programs to be their primary orientation toward the management of public concerns.
引用
收藏
页码:525 / 534
页数:10
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [41] Rohr JohnA., 1998, PUBLIC SERVICE ETHIC
  • [42] Solomon R. C., 1992, Ethics and excellence: Cooperation and integrity in business
  • [43] SCHIZOPHRENIA OF MODERN ETHICAL THEORIES
    STOCKER, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1976, 73 (14) : 453 - 466
  • [44] WALL B, 1991, FRONTIERS PUBLIC MAN, P135