Nickel toxicity in two durum wheat cultivars differing in drought sensitivity

被引:19
|
作者
Pandolfini, T
Gabbrielli, R
Ciscato, M
机构
[1] Laboratorio di Fisiologia Vegetale, Dipartimento di Biologia Vegetale, Università di Firenze, 50121 Firenze
关键词
D O I
10.1080/01904169609365225
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
The effects of nickel (Ni) on growth, leaf water status, and mineral nutrient concentration were studied in two wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) cultivars with different sensitivity to water stress: 'Adamello' [drought sensitive (DS)] and 'Ofanto' [drought tolerant, (DT)]. The DT cultivar showed a higher Ni absorption capacity: 'Ofanto' seedlings grown in the presence of 35 mu M Ni had a 3.5 times greater concentration of Ni in roots than did 'Adamello'. Despite the greater Ni tissue content, the DT cultivar exhibited better growth and nutritional status when compared to the DS cultivar. In the DS cultivar the concentration of chlorophyll a and b was reduced by Ni treatment. Chlorophyll a concentration decreased in the DT cultivar, but to a lesser extent than in the DS cultivar; chlorophyll b was not altered by Ni level in the DT cultivar. Nickel caused a decrease in the water potential (psi(W)) and relative water content (RWC) in both cultivars, but these decreases were greater in the DS cultivar. The antioxidative defense enzymes, guaiacol peroxidase, ascorbate peroxidase, and glutathione reductase, showed increased activity in Ni-treated DS seedlings; this increase in activity was not observed in the DT seedlings. These data suggest that different wheat genotypes may markedly differ in Ni uptake and sensitivity and that a enhanced capacity to counteract Ni stress may be associated with drought resistance.
引用
收藏
页码:1611 / 1627
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Responses of Two Cultivars of Winter Wheat Differing in Sensitivity to Aluminum Toxicity
    SHEN ZHEN-GUO
    LIAN CHUN-LAN and WU LIE-HONG(Nanjing Agricutural University
    PEDOSPHERE, 1996, (03) : 233 - 241
  • [2] Drought responsive microRNAs in two barley cultivars differing in their level of sensitivity to drought stress
    Fard, Ehsan Mohseni
    Bakhshi, Behnam
    Keshavarznia, Reza
    Nikpay, Nava
    Shahbazi, Maryam
    Salekdeh, Ghasem Hosseini
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2017, 118 : 121 - 129
  • [3] The maintenance of photosynthetic electron transport in relation to osmotic adjustment in durum wheat cultivars differing in drought resistance
    Flagella, Z
    Campanile, RG
    Ronga, G
    Stoppelli, MC
    Pastore, D
    DeCaro, A
    DiFonzo, N
    PLANT SCIENCE, 1996, 118 (02) : 127 - 133
  • [4] Effect of drought on ear and flag leaf photosynthesis of two wheat cultivars differing in drought resistance
    Inoue, T
    Inanaga, S
    Sugimoto, Y
    An, P
    Eneji, AE
    PHOTOSYNTHETICA, 2004, 42 (04) : 559 - 565
  • [5] A stress-related transcription factor belonging to the YL-1 family is differently regulated in durum wheat cultivars differing in drought sensitivity
    Gulli, Mariolina
    De Pascali, Mariarosaria
    Perrotta, Carla
    Rampino, Patrizia
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 2022, 170 : 307 - 315
  • [6] ALUMINUM TOXICITY EFFECTS ON DURUM-WHEAT CULTIVARS
    MOUSTAKAS, M
    YUPSANIS, T
    SYMEONIDIS, L
    KARATAGLIS, S
    JOURNAL OF PLANT NUTRITION, 1992, 15 (05) : 627 - 638
  • [7] THE ETHYLENE-FORMING ENZYME IN TWO CULTIVARS OF WINTER WHEAT DIFFERING IN DROUGHT RESISTANCE
    Rose, Elise
    PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 1984, 75 : 89 - 89
  • [8] Uptake of zinc by rye, bread wheat and durum wheat cultivars differing in zinc efficiency
    B. Erenoglu
    I. Cakmak
    V. Römheld
    R. Derici
    Z. Rengel
    Plant and Soil, 1999, 209 : 245 - 252
  • [9] Uptake of zinc by rye, bread wheat and durum wheat cultivars differing in zinc efficiency
    Erenoglu, B
    Cakmak, I
    Römheld, V
    Derici, R
    Rengel, Z
    PLANT AND SOIL, 1999, 209 (02) : 245 - 252
  • [10] Effects of nickel on zinc uptake and translocation in two wheat cultivars differing in zinc efficiency
    Dalir, Neda
    Tandy, Susan
    Gramlich, Anja
    Khoshgoftarmanesh, Amir
    Schulin, Rainer
    ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXPERIMENTAL BOTANY, 2017, 134 : 96 - 101