Mechanical weed control in organic winter wheat

被引:22
作者
Pannacci, Euro [1 ]
Tei, Francesco [1 ]
Guiducci, Marcello [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Perugia, Dept Agr Food & Environm Sci, Borgo 20 Giugno 74, I-06121 Perugia, Italy
关键词
Finger-weeding; Integrated weed management; Mechanical weed control; Split-hoeing; Spring-tine harrowing; CROP SOIL COVER; DURUM-WHEAT; ROW; YIELD; STRATEGIES; MANAGEMENT; EFFICACY; DENSITY; SYSTEMS; CEREAL;
D O I
10.4081/ija.2017.900
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Three field experiments were carried out in organic winter wheat in three consecutive years (exp. 1, 2005-06; exp. 2, 2006-07; exp. 3, 2007-08) in central Italy (42 degrees 57' N - 12 degrees 22' E, 165 m a.s.l.) in order to evaluate the efficacy against weeds and the effects on winter wheat of two main mechanical weed control strategies: i) spring tine harrowing used at three different application times (1 passage at T1, 2 passages at the time T1, 1 passage at T1 followed by 1 passage at T1 + 14 days) in the crop sowed at narrow (traditional) row spacing (0.15 m); and ii) split-hoeing and finger-weeder, alone and combined at T1, in the crop sowed at wider row spacing (0.30 m). At the time T1 winter wheat was at tillering and weeds were at the cotyledons-2 true leaves growth stage. The experimental design was a randomized block with four replicates. Six weeks after mechanical treatments, weed ground cover (%) was rated visually using the Braun-Blanquet cover-abundance scale; weeds on three squares (0.6x0.5 m each one) per plot were collected, counted, weighed, dried in oven at 105 degrees C to determine weed density and weed above-ground dry biomass. At harvest, wheat ears density, grain yield, weight of 1000 seeds and hectolitre weight were recorded. Total weed flora was quite different in the three experiments. The main weed species were: Polygonum aviculare L. (exp. 1 and 2), Fallopia convolvulus (L.) A. Love (exp. 1 and 3), Stachys annua (L.) L. (exp. 1), Anagallis arvensis L. (exp. 2), Papaver rhoeas L. (exp. 3), Veronica hederifolia L. (exp. 3). In the winter wheat sowed at narrow rows, 2 passages with spring-tine harrowing at the same time seems to be the best option in order to reconcile a good efficacy with the feasibility of treatment. In wider rows spacing the best weed control was obtained by split hoeing alone or combined with finger-weeder. The grain yield, on average 10% higher in narrow rows, the lower costs and the good selectivity of spring-tine harrowing treatments seem to suggest the adoption of narrow rows spacing in wheat in organic and low-input farming systems.
引用
收藏
页码:336 / 342
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Finger-harrowing of durum wheat under different tillage systems [J].
Bàrberi, P ;
Silvestri, N ;
Peruzzi, A ;
Raffaelli, M .
BIOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE & HORTICULTURE, 2000, 17 (04) :285-303
[2]   Eleven-year results on soft and durum wheat crops grown in an organic and in a conventional low input cropping system [J].
Benincasa, Paolo ;
Farneselli, Michela ;
Tosti, Giacomo ;
Bonciarelli, Umberto ;
Lorenzetti, Maria Chiara ;
Guiducci, Marcello .
ITALIAN JOURNAL OF AGRONOMY, 2016, 11 (02) :77-84
[3]  
Blair A. M., 1997, Aspects of Applied Biology, P385
[4]   AN ANALYSIS OF TRANSFORMATIONS [J].
BOX, GEP ;
COX, DR .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES B-STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY, 1964, 26 (02) :211-252
[5]   Interactions between wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivar, row spacing and density and the effect on weed suppression and crop yield [J].
Champion, GT ;
Froud-Williams, RJ ;
Holland, JM .
ANNALS OF APPLIED BIOLOGY, 1998, 133 (03) :443-453
[6]   Relating weed size, crop soil cover and soil moisture with weed harrowing efficacy on Papaver rhoeas and other dicotyledoneous weeds in Mediterranean conditions [J].
Cirujeda, A. ;
Taberner, A. .
BIOLOGICAL AGRICULTURE & HORTICULTURE, 2006, 24 (02) :181-195
[7]   Relationship between speed, soil movement into the cereal row and intra-row weed control efficacy by weed harrowing [J].
Cirujeda, A ;
Melander, B ;
Rasmussen, K ;
Rasmussen, IA .
WEED RESEARCH, 2003, 43 (04) :285-296
[8]  
Cloutier DC, 2007, NON CHEMICAL WEED MANAGEMENT: PRINCIPLES, CONCEPTS AND TECHNOLOGY, P111, DOI 10.1079/9781845932909.0111
[9]  
Dastgheib F, 2004, N Z PLANT PROTECT-SE, P41
[10]  
European Commission, 2009, OFFICIAL J L, V309