Risk assessment for marine ecosystem-based management (EBM)

被引:4
作者
Clark, Dana E. [1 ]
Gladstone-Gallagher, Rebecca, V [2 ]
Hewitt, Judi E. [3 ,4 ]
Stephenson, Fabrice [4 ]
Ellis, Joanne, I [5 ]
机构
[1] Cawthron Inst, Hlth Oceans, Nelson, New Zealand
[2] Univ Auckland, Inst Marine Sci, Auckland, New Zealand
[3] Univ Auckland, Dept Stat, Auckland, New Zealand
[4] Natl Inst Water & Atmospher Res, Coasts & Estuaries, Hamilton, New Zealand
[5] Univ Waikato, Sch Sci, Tauranga, New Zealand
关键词
Bayesian networks; coupled natural-human systems; cumulative effects assessments; decision support; ecosystem integrity; Indigenous knowledge; multiple stressors; New Zealand; risk analysis; uncertainty; UNCERTAINTY; IMPACTS; COASTAL; CONSERVATION; DISTURBANCE; COMPLEXITY; STRESSORS; KNOWLEDGE; MODELS;
D O I
10.1111/csp2.12636
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem-based management (EBM) is a holistic way to manage the marine environment, involving partnerships between people and the recognition of ecological complexity. As we progress towards EBM, risk assessments must move beyond an evaluation of the direct impacts of a single stressor on a species or habitat. Here, we propose 12 risk assessment criteria that explicitly reflect the principles of EBM. These criteria include the need to assess risk to multiple ecosystem components and values, evaluate place and time-specific ecological complexity, evaluate recovery, accommodate different knowledge types and communicate uncertainty. Contemporary risk assessment approaches rarely meet all 12 criteria and whilst many approaches could be adapted to do so, some are more easily modified than others. Risk assessment approaches that meet our criteria have the greatest potential to support decision-making in an EBM context and thereby safeguard our marine environments and their values for future generations.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 54 条
  • [1] The human side of marine ecosystem-based management (EBM): `Sectoral interplay' as a challenge to implementing EBM
    Alexander, K. A.
    Haward, M.
    [J]. MARINE POLICY, 2019, 101 : 33 - 38
  • [2] Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making
    Ascough, J. C., II
    Maier, H. R.
    Ravalico, J. K.
    Strudley, M. W.
    [J]. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2008, 219 (3-4) : 383 - 399
  • [3] Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning
    Berkes, Fikret
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 (05) : 1692 - 1702
  • [4] Informing the management of multiple stressors on estuarine ecosystems using an expert-based Bayesian Network model
    Bulmer, R. H.
    Stephenson, F.
    Lohrer, A. M.
    Lundquist, C. J.
    Madarasz-Smith, A.
    Pilditch, C. A.
    Thrush, S. F.
    Hewitt, J. E.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2022, 301
  • [5] Campbell Marnie L., 2013, Management of Biological Invasions, V4, P171
  • [6] Foley M., 2019, RESOUR MANAG J NOV, P22
  • [7] Linking knowledge to action in ocean ecosystem management: The Ocean Modeling Forum
    Francis, Tessa B.
    Levin, Phillip S.
    Punt, Andre E.
    Kaplan, Isaac C.
    Varney, Anna
    Norman, Karma
    [J]. ELEMENTA-SCIENCE OF THE ANTHROPOCENE, 2018, 6
  • [8] Effect of complexity on marine ecosystem models
    Fulton, EA
    Smith, ADM
    Johnson, CR
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2003, 253 : 1 - 16
  • [9] Ecological risks of demersal fishing on deepwater chondrichthyan populations in the Southern Indian and South Pacific Oceans
    Georgeson, L.
    Rigby, C. L.
    Emery, T. J.
    Fuller, M.
    Hartog, J.
    Williams, A. J.
    Hobday, A. J.
    Duffy, C. A. J.
    Simpfendorfer, C. A.
    Okuda, T.
    Stobutzki, I. C.
    Nicol, S. J.
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2020, 77 (05) : 1711 - 1727
  • [10] Connectivity between juvenile and adult fish populations: do adults remain near their recruitment estuaries?
    Gillanders, BM
    [J]. MARINE ECOLOGY PROGRESS SERIES, 2002, 240 : 215 - 223