What is the future policy for photovoltaic power applications in China? Lessons from the past

被引:40
作者
Zhou, Dequn [1 ]
Chong, Zhaotian [1 ]
Wang, Qunwei [1 ]
机构
[1] Nanjing Univ Aeronaut & Astronaut, Coll Econ & Management, 29 Jiangjun Ave, Nanjing 211106, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Photovoltaic power; Policy instrument; Content analysis; Project lifecycle; LOW-CARBON TRANSITION; SOLAR PV; ECONOMIC-ANALYSIS; INVESTMENT; GENERATION; MARKET; DEPLOYMENT; INDUSTRY; SUPPORT; COST;
D O I
10.1016/j.resourpol.2019.101575
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Over the past decades, a series of policies and regulations have been formulated to encourage photovoltaic (PV) development in China. The phenomena of "subsidy deception" and "PV power curtailment and brownout" indicate the policies have encountered problems in implementation. A large gap between subsidies and renewable funds has compelled the Chinese government to gradually withdraw subsidy policy. As such, investors are focusing on assessing China's future policies for PV application. To determine the reasons for the implementation problems and to seek solutions, this study summarized existing PV power application policies and established a two-dimensional framework to analyze these policies, using a content analysis. We found the government relies too much on the state's macroeconomic control, and does not fully play the role of "invisible hand" in PV power applications. Supply-type and environment-type policies are widely used, making up almost 80% of the total. To fully enable the market's role, it is necessary to reinforce demand-type policies and improve green certification transactions. These are forms of incentive policies instead of subsidies.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 61 条
[11]   Reserve assessment and certification of Brazil's oil and mineral sectors and energy storage: New trends, analysis, and regulatory proposals [J].
Camara, Roberto ;
Camara, George ;
Neto, Moacyr Andrade ;
Milosevic, Tatiana ;
Andrade, Jose Celio ;
Rocha, Paulo .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2019, 62 :347-356
[12]   Financial assessment of government subsidy policy on photovoltaic systems for industrial users: A case study in Taiwan [J].
Chou, Shuo-Yan ;
Nguyen Thi Anh Tuyet ;
Tiffany Hui-Kuang Yu ;
Phan Nguyen Ky Phuc .
ENERGY POLICY, 2015, 87 :505-516
[13]   Supporting sustainable electricity technologies in Greece using MCDM [J].
Doukas, Haris ;
Patlitzianas, Konstantinos D. ;
Psarras, John .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2006, 31 (02) :129-136
[14]   Comparative economic analysis of support policies for solar PV in the most representative EU countries [J].
Dusonchet, L. ;
Telaretti, E. .
RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2015, 42 :986-998
[15]   Solar photovoltaic policy review and economic analysis for on-grid residential installations in the Philippines [J].
Farias-Rocha, Ana Paula ;
Hassan, Karim M. Kamel ;
Malimata, Jesselyn Rochelle Rodriguez ;
Sanchez-Cubedo, Griselda Adilene ;
Rojas-Solorzano, Luis R. .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 223 :45-56
[16]  
Feldman RonJ., 2002, The Tools of Government: A Guide to the New Governance, P186
[17]   A three-dimensional framework to explore corporate sustainability activities in the mining industry: Current status and challenges ahead [J].
Fuisz-Kehrbach, Sonja-Katrin .
RESOURCES POLICY, 2015, 46 :101-115
[18]   Local demand-pull policy and energy innovation: Evidence from the solar photovoltaic market in China [J].
Gao, Xue ;
Rai, Varun .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 128 (364-376) :364-376
[19]   Survey of photovoltaic industry and policy in Germany and China [J].
Grau, Thilo ;
Huo, Molin ;
Neuhoff, Karsten .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 51 :20-37
[20]   Improving Nigeria's renewable energy policy design: A case study approach [J].
Gungah, Aarti ;
Emodi, Nnaemeka Vincent ;
Dioha, Michael O. .
ENERGY POLICY, 2019, 130 :89-100