The use of grey-based methods in multi-criteria decision analysis for the evaluation of sustainable energy systems: A review

被引：124

作者：

Elena Arce, Maria ^{[1
]}

Saavedra, Angeles ^{[2
]}

Miguez, Jose L. ^{[3
]}

Granada, Enrique ^{[3
]}

机构：

[1] Univ Vigo, Spanish Naval Acad, Def Univ Ctr, Marin Pontevedra 36920, Spain

[2] Univ Vigo, ETS Ingn Minas, Vigo 36310, Spain

[3] Univ Vigo, ETS Ingenieros Ind, Vigo 36310, Spain

来源：

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS | 2015年 / 47卷

关键词：

Sustainable energy; Multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA); Grey-based analysis; Energy systems; MULTIPLE QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS; RELATIONAL ANALYSIS; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; RENEWABLE ENERGY; DELPHI METHOD; MORPHOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION; GENERATION SECTOR; TAGUCHI METHOD; MAKING MODEL; FUZZY-AHP;

D O I：

10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.010

中图分类号：

X [环境科学、安全科学];

学科分类号：

08 ; 0830 ;

摘要：

The European energy system is characterized by a high dependence on fossil fuels and energy importation. Renewable energies are a solution to this issue. To change the energy supply, it is necessary to analyze the energy system. Thus, decision-makers face a multi-attribute decision problem. Many sustainable energy systems analyses are characterized by multiple, interrelated parameters and vague information. When the information is vague, it is necessary to implement multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) tools that can work with poor data systems. This article reviews appropriated methods and different stages of MCDA problems using grey relation methods (i.e., criteria selection and weighting methods). It is observed that technical criteria are the most evaluated parameters, followed by environmental criteria, in terms of gas emissions. In referring to criteria weighting, the analytical hierarchy process is the most popular tool, especially when it is essential to evaluate the opinion of an expert panel. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

引用

页码：924 / 932

页数：9

共 141 条

[1] Determination of optimum parameters for multi-performance characteristics in turning by using grey relational analysis [J].

Abhang, L. B. ;

Hameedullah, M. .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ADVANCED MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 63 (1-4) :13-24

[2] A hybrid approach based on locally linear neuro-fuzzy modeling and TOPSIS to determine the quality grade of gas well-drilling projects [J].

Ahari, Roya M. ;

Niaki, S. T. A. .

JOURNAL OF PETROLEUM SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2014, 114 :99-106

[3] The Evaluation of Power Plants Investment Alternatives with Grey Relational Analysis Approach for Turkey [J].

Akay, D. ;

Boran, F. E. ;

Yilmaz, M. ;

Atak, M. .

ENERGY SOURCES PART B-ECONOMICS PLANNING AND POLICY, 2013, 8 (01) :35-43

[4] Developing sustainable building assessment scheme for Saudi Arabia: Delphi consultation approach [J].

Alyami, Saleh. H. ;

Rezgui, Yacine ;

Kwan, Alan .

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2013, 27 :43-54

[5]

Anagnostopoulos K.P., 2007, European Water, V19, P15

[6] Effective optimization of indium tin oxide films by a statistical approach for shallow emitter based crystalline silicon solar cell applications [J].

Anh Huy Tuan Le ;

Ahn, Shihyun ;

Han, Sangmyeong ;

Kim, Jungmo ;

Hussain, Shahzada Qamar ;

Park, Hyeongsik ;

Park, Cheolmin ;

Cam Phu Thi Nguyen ;

Vinh Ai Dao ;

Yi, Junsin .

SOLAR ENERGY MATERIALS AND SOLAR CELLS, 2014, 125 :176-183

[7]

[Anonymous], 2014, STAT REV WORLD ENERG

[8]

[Anonymous], 2006, MULTIPLE ATTRIBUTE D

[9] Biomass Fuel and Combustion Conditions Selection in a Fixed Bed Combustor [J].

Arce, Maria E. ;

Saavedra, Angeles ;

Miguez, Jose L. ;

Granada, Enrique ;

Cacabelos, Anton .

ENERGIES, 2013, 6 (11) :5973-5989

[10] A source of renewable energy in Malaysia, why biodiesel? [J].

Ashnani, Mohammad Hossein Mohammadi ;

Johari, Anwar ;

Hashim, Haslenda ;

Hasani, Elham .

RENEWABLE & SUSTAINABLE ENERGY REVIEWS, 2014, 35 :244-257

← 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 →