Effects of Geofoam Panels on Static Behavior of Cantilever Retaining Wall

被引:10
|
作者
Notash, Navid Hasanpouri [1 ,2 ]
Dabiri, Rouzbeh [2 ]
机构
[1] Islamic Azad Univ, East Azerbaijan Sci & Res Branch, Dept Civil Engn, Tabriz, Iran
[2] Islamic Azad Univ, Tabriz Branch, Dept Civil Engn, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
EPS GEOFOAM;
D O I
10.1155/2018/2942689
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Geofoam is one of the geosynthetic products that can be used in geotechnical applications. According to researches, expanded polystyrene (EPS) geofoam placed directly against a rigid retaining wall has been proposed as a strategy to reduce static loads on the wall. This study employed a finite diffierence analysis using a 2-D FLAC computer program by considering yielding and nonyielding states for retaining walls to explore the effectiveness of geofoam panels in improving the static performance of cantilever retaining walls. Retaining walls at heights of 3, 6, and 9 meters and geofoam panels with densities of 15, 20, and 25 (kg/m(3)) at three relative thicknesses of t/H. 0.05, 0.2, and 0.4 were modelled in this numerical study. In addition, the performance of the double EPS buffer system, which involves two vertical geofoam panels, in retaining walls' stability with four panel spacing (50, 100, 150, and 200 cm) was also evaluated in this research. The results showed that use of EPS15 with density equal to 15 (kg/m(3)) which has the lowest density among other geofoam panels has a significant role in reduction of lateral stresses, although the performance of geofoam in nonyielding retaining walls is better than yielding retaining walls.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Piled cantilever retaining wall at port hedland - Driveability and wall deflection
    Thomas, J.
    Berry, A.D.
    Terwijn, R.J.M.
    Australian Geomechanics Journal, 2013, 48 (04): : 181 - 188
  • [32] Seismic reliability analysis for the stability of cantilever retaining wall
    Huang, Fu-Kuo
    Wang, Grace-S
    Journal of the Chinese Institute of Civil and Hydraulic Engineering, 2009, 21 (04): : 365 - 382
  • [33] DYNAMIC CENTRIFUGE TESTING OF A CANTILEVER RETAINING WALL - DISCUSSION
    SAVIDIS, S
    KLAPPERICH, H
    SARFELD, W
    EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING & STRUCTURAL DYNAMICS, 1985, 13 (01): : 129 - 131
  • [34] A counterfort versus a cantilever retaining wall - a seismic equivalence
    Chugh, AK
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL AND ANALYTICAL METHODS IN GEOMECHANICS, 2005, 29 (09) : 897 - 917
  • [35] In-situ dynamic testing of a cantilever retaining wall
    Alampalli, S
    Elgamal, AW
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 15TH INTERNATIONAL MODAL ANALYSIS CONFERENCE - IMAC, VOLS I AND II, 1997, 3089 : 120 - 126
  • [36] Numerical modeling of gravity retaining wall using EPS geofoam under seismic condition
    Mustafa R.
    Asian Journal of Civil Engineering, 2024, 25 (3) : 2541 - 2552
  • [37] A strength calculation method of rc cantilever wall panels
    1600, Architectural Institute of Japan (79):
  • [38] Mechanical Performance of Anchored-Plating Cantilever Retaining Wall
    Zhang, Hongbo
    Lu, Liang
    Yue, Hongya
    Song, Xiuguang
    PROCEEDINGS OF GEOSHANGHAI 2018 INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE: TRANSPORTATION GEOTECHNICS AND PAVEMENT ENGINEERING, 2018, : 144 - 152
  • [39] Natural frequency of a cantilever retaining wall and its seismic stability
    Bakr, J.
    Ahmad, S. M.
    Lombardi, D.
    EARTHQUAKE GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING FOR PROTECTION AND DEVELOPMENT OF ENVIRONMENT AND CONSTRUCTIONS, 2019, 4 : 1273 - 1280
  • [40] A Prediction Model for the Deformation of an Embedded Cantilever Retaining Wall in Sand
    Zheng, Gang
    He, Xiaopei
    Zhou, Haizuo
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMECHANICS, 2023, 23 (03)