共 1 条
Assessing Dutch women's experiences of labour and birth: adaptations and psychometric evaluations of the measures Mothers on Autonomy in Decision Making Scale, Mothers on Respect Index, and Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0
被引:15
作者:
Peters, L. L.
[1
,2
,3
]
van der Pijl, M. S. G.
[2
]
Vedam, S.
[4
]
Barkema, W. S.
[1
,2
,3
]
van Lohuizen, M. T.
[3
]
Jansen, D. E. M. C.
[1
,2
]
Feijen-de Jong, E., I
[1
,2
,3
]
机构:
[1] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Gen Practice & Elderly Med, Groningen, Netherlands
[2] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Amsterdam Publ Hlth Res Inst, Dept Midwifery Sci AVAG, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[3] AVAG Midwifery Acad Amsterdam Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[4] Univ British Columbia, Div Midwifery, Birth Pl Lab, Vancouver, BC, Canada
关键词:
Childbirth;
Personal autonomy;
Decision making;
Respect;
Patient reported outcome measure;
Psychometrics;
Midwifery;
Obstetrics;
HUMAN-RIGHTS;
PERCEPTIONS;
CARE;
MISTREATMENT;
SATISFACTION;
EXPECTATIONS;
QUALITY;
HEALTH;
D O I:
10.1186/s12884-022-04445-0
中图分类号:
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号:
100211 ;
摘要:
Background The Mothers Autonomy in Decision Making Scale (MADM) assesses women's autonomy and role in decision making. The Mothers on Respect Index (MORi) asseses women's experiences of respect when interacting with their healthcare providers. The Childbirth Experience Questionnaire 2.0 assesses the overall experience of childbirth (CEQ2.0). There are no validated Dutch measures of the quality of women's experiences in the intrapartum period. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of these measures in their Dutch translations. Methods The available Dutch versions of the MADM and MORi were adapted to assess experiences in the intrapartum period. The CEQ2.0 was translated by using forward-backward procedures. The three measures were included in an online survey including items on individual characteristics (i.e. maternal, birth, birth interventions). Reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alphas. Mann-Whitney, Kruskal Wallis or Student T-tests were applied where appropriate, to assess discrimination between women who differed on individual characteristics (known group validity). We hypothesized that women who experienced pregnancy complications and birth interventions would have statistically lower scores on the MADM, MORi and CEQ2.0, compared with women who had healthy pregnancies and physiological births. Convergent validity was assessed using Spearman Rank correlations between the MADM, MORi and/or CEQ2.0. We hypothesized moderate to strong correlations between these measures. Women's uptake of and feedback on the measures were tracked to assess acceptability and clarity. Results In total 621 women were included in the cross sectional study. The calculated Cronbach's alphas for the MADM, MORi and CEQ, were >= 0.77. Knowngroup validity was confirmed through significant differences on all relevant individual characteristics, except for vaginal laceration repair. Spearman Rank correlations ranged from 0.46-0.80. In total 98% of the included women out of the eligible population completed the MADM and MORi for each healthcare professional they encountered during childbirth. The proportions of MADM and MORi-items which were difficult to complete ranged from 0.0-10.8%, 0.6-2.7%, respectively. Conclusions The results of our study showed that the Dutch version of the MADM, MORi and CEQ2.0 in Dutch are valid instruments that can be used to assess women's experiences in the intrapartum period.
引用
收藏
页数:25
相关论文