Test-retest reliability of the Greek Speech-in-babble test (SinB) as a potential screening tool for auditory processing disorder

被引:4
|
作者
Sofokleous, Valentinos [1 ,2 ]
Marmara, Maria [1 ]
Panagiotopoulos, Georgios K. [1 ]
Mouza, Stellina [1 ]
Tsofidou, Maria [1 ]
Sereti, Afroditi [1 ]
Grigoriadi, Ioanna [1 ]
Petridis, Eleftherios [1 ]
Sidiras, Christos [1 ]
Tsiourdas, Michael [1 ]
Iliadou, Vasiliki [1 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Med Sch, Psychoacoust Lab, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Athens Childrens Hosp P&A Kyriacou, Dept Pediat Otorhinolaryngol, Levadias St, Athens 11527, Greece
关键词
Speech-in-noise; Speech perception; Hearing; Auditory processing disorder; Screening; WORD-RECOGNITION; NORMAL-HEARING; TEST BATTERY; CHILDREN; NOISE; PERCEPTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijporl.2019.109848
中图分类号
R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100213 ;
摘要
Introduction: There seems to exist a specific group of people considered to be at higher risk of having Auditory Processing Disorders (APD). These patients are frequently initially referred to, or managed by various professionals such as Otolaryngologists, Speech Therapists, and Occupational Therapists. It is, therefore, essential to retain a low threshold of when to refer such individuals for a formal APD diagnostic evaluation. Under these circumstances, there might be a role for the Greek Speech-in-Babble (SinB) recognition WA as a screening tool for abnormal auditory processing competency. Objective: To explore the WA-retest reliability of a diagnostically validated speech-in-babble test, the Greek SinB, as a potential screening tool. Methods: Ten health professionals coming from various disciplines administered the SinB WA twice, under conditions similar to those encountered when using it as a screening tool, and test-retest reliability was assessed. 93 Greek-speaking individuals, of whom 27 adults and 66 children or young adolescents aged five years old or more, served as our study sample. Results: For the right ear, the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) was 0.858 with a 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.786-0.906. Slightly better conditions apply for the left ear, as the ICC was 0.873 with 95% CI = 0.809-0.916. These 95% CIs indicate a 'good' to 'excellent' level of reliability for both ears. Spearman's rho was 0.86 and 0.71 for the right and left ear, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the WA possesses the required reliability to evaluate a subject's hearing abilities under screening conditions. On these terms, it could be used to screen populations considered as being at risk for Auditory Processing Disorders. Forthcoming research should focus on establishing its efficiency by comparing the results of the screening WA with that of diagnostic tests and on fine-tuning SinB as a screening tool.
引用
收藏
页数:5
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [21] Stability of Early Auditory Evoked Potential Components Over Extended Test-Retest Intervals in Young Adults
    Bieber, Rebecca E.
    Fernandez, Katharine
    Zalewski, Chris
    Cheng, Hui
    Brewer, Carmen C.
    EAR AND HEARING, 2020, 41 (06) : 1461 - 1469
  • [22] Inter-Rater and Test-Retest Reliability of an Innovative Evaluation Tool: CrossFit Functional Assessment Battery of Tests for the Shoulder Joint
    Bakaraki, Akrivi
    Parmaxizoglou, Dionisis
    Gkrilias, Panagiotis
    Tsekoura, Maria
    Fousekis, Konstantinos
    Xergia, Sofia
    Matzaroglou, Charalampos
    Tsepis, Elias
    CUREUS JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCE, 2024, 16 (01)
  • [23] Limited evidence of test-retest reliability in infant-directed speech preference in a large preregistered infant experiment
    Schreiner, Melanie S.
    Zettersten, Martin
    Bergmann, Christina
    Frank, Michael C.
    Fritzsche, Tom
    Gonzalez-Gomez, Nayeli
    Hamlin, Kiley
    Kartushina, Natalia
    Kellier, Danielle J.
    Mani, Nivedita
    Mayor, Julien
    Saffran, Jenny
    Shukla, Mohinish
    Silverstein, Priya
    Soderstrom, Melanie
    Lippold, Matthias
    DEVELOPMENTAL SCIENCE, 2024, 27 (06)
  • [24] Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (NutriSTEP™):: validation and test-retest reliability of a parent-administered questionnaire assessing nutrition risk of preschoolers
    Simpson, J. A. Randall
    Keller, H. H.
    Rysdale, L. A.
    Beyers, J. E.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 2008, 62 (06) : 770 - 780
  • [25] Supra-threshold auditory brainstem response amplitudes in humans: Test-retest reliability, electrode montage and noise exposure
    Prendergast, Garreth
    Tu, Wenhe
    Guest, Hannah
    Millman, Rebecca E.
    Kluk, Karolina
    Couth, Samuel
    Munro, Kevin J.
    Plack, Christopher J.
    HEARING RESEARCH, 2018, 364 : 38 - 47
  • [26] Simplified frequency selectivity measure as a potential candidate for hearing screening: changes with masker level and test-retest reliability of self-administered testing
    Wang, Xinyang
    Rasidi, Wan Nur Asyiqin
    Seluakumaran, Kumar
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2024,
  • [27] Test-retest reliability of the computer-based cognitive assessment tool for community-dwelling older adults in Japan: The Otassha study
    Chen, Jou-Yin
    Kawai, Hisashi
    Takahashi, Junta
    Ejiri, Manami
    Imamura, Keigo
    Obuchi, Shuichi P.
    DIGITAL HEALTH, 2025, 11
  • [28] Optimization of rs-fMRI Pre-processing for Enhanced Signal-Noise Separation, Test-Retest Reliability, and Group Discrimination
    Shirer, William R.
    Jiang, Heidi
    Price, Collin M.
    Ng, Bernard
    Greicius, Michael D.
    NEUROIMAGE, 2015, 117 : 67 - 79
  • [29] Older adults' performance on the speech, spatial, and qualities of hearing scale (SSQ): Test-retest reliability and a comparison of interview and self-administration methods
    Singh, Gurjit
    Pichora-Fuller, M. Kathleen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDIOLOGY, 2010, 49 (10) : 733 - 740
  • [30] Nutrition Screening Tool for Every Preschooler (NutriSTEP™): validation and test–retest reliability of a parent-administered questionnaire assessing nutrition risk of preschoolers
    J A Randall Simpson
    H H Keller
    L A Rysdale
    J E Beyers
    European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 2008, 62 : 770 - 780