Quantitative risk assessment of domino effect in Natech scenarios triggered by lightning

被引:44
|
作者
Misuri, Alessio [1 ]
Antonioni, Giacomo [1 ]
Cozzani, Valerio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Civil Chem Environm & Mat Engn, Alma Mater Studiorum, LISES, Bologna, Italy
关键词
Natech; Domino effect; Escalation; Lightning; Quantitative risk assessment; Cascading events; EVENTS DAMAGE MODEL; STRUCTURAL FRAGMENTS; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; PROCESS PLANTS; UNITED-STATES; INDUSTRIAL; ACCIDENTS; PROBABILITY; VULNERABILITY; METHODOLOGY;
D O I
10.1016/j.jlp.2020.104095
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
Lightning strike is the natural event more frequency causing Natech accidents involving atmospheric storage tanks. Despite the resulting fires have usually limited severity and only local effects, domino effect may cause the escalation of these primary events, possibly affecting nearby pressurized storages and process equipment, thus resulting in relevant increase in the potential area impacted. A methodology was developed for the quantitative assessment of risk due to domino effects caused by Natech accidents triggered by lightning. A comprehensive procedure was obtained, tailoring lightning risk assessment to include probabilistic models for domino escalation based on probit approach and combinatorial analysis. The methodology was applied to a case-study to evidence the shift in risk figures due to domino effect and the credibility of the secondary domino scenarios. The results of the case-study show that an increase up to two orders of magnitude with respect to risk calculated for conventional scenarios is possible when considering lightning-induced Natech primary scenarios and their escalation.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Reduction of NaTech Risk Due to Lightning by the Use of Protection Systems
    Necci, Amos
    Antonioni, Giacomo
    Cozzani, Valerio
    Borghetti, Alberto
    Nucci, Carlo Alberto
    LP2013 - 14TH SYMPOSIUM ON LOSS PREVENTION AND SAFETY PROMOTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, VOLS I AND II, 2013, 31 : 763 - 768
  • [32] Quantitative Risk Analysis of Technological Accidents Triggered by Lightning and Flood in Turkey
    Cetinyokus, Saliha
    Kurt, Meryem Merve
    Cetinyokus, Tahsin
    IRANIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMISTRY & CHEMICAL ENGINEERING-INTERNATIONAL ENGLISH EDITION, 2024, 42 (12): : 4384 - 4398
  • [33] A paradigm shift in the assessment of Natech scenarios in chemical and process facilities
    Misuri, Alessio
    Cozzani, Valerio
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2021, 152 : 338 - 351
  • [34] Method for quantitative assessment of the domino effect in industrial sites
    Kadri, Farid
    Chatelet, Eric
    Chen, Guangpu
    PROCESS SAFETY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, 2013, 91 (06) : 452 - 462
  • [35] Quantitative assessment of domino effect in an extended industrial area
    Antonioni, G.
    Spadoni, G.
    Cozzani, V.
    Dondi, C.
    Egidi, D.
    SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK ANALYSIS: THEORY, METHODS AND APPLICATIONS, VOLS 1-4, 2009, : 2397 - +
  • [36] Method for quantitative assessment of domino effect caused by overpressure
    Kadri, F.
    Chatelet, E.
    Chen, G.
    ADVANCES IN SAFETY, RELIABILITY AND RISK MANAGEMENT, 2012, : 1360 - 1367
  • [37] The Effect of Safety Barrier Degradation on the Severity of Primary Natech Scenarios*
    Misuri, Alessio
    Ricci, Federica
    Sorichetti, Riccardo
    Cozzani, Valerio
    RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2023, 235
  • [38] Frequency Evaluation for Domino Scenarios Triggered by Heat Radiation Exposure
    Argenti, Francesca
    Landucci, Gabriele
    Antonioni, Giacomo
    Cozzani, Valerio
    CISAP6: 6TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SAFETY & ENVIRONMENT IN PROCESS & POWER INDUSTRY, 2014, 36 : 373 - +
  • [39] Natech risk and management: an assessment of the state of the art
    Steinberg, Laura J.
    Sengul, Hatice
    Cruz, Ana Maria
    NATURAL HAZARDS, 2008, 46 (02) : 143 - 152
  • [40] SI: Natech risk assessment of hazardous facilities
    Fabrizio Paolacci
    Christoph Butenweg
    Dimitrios Vamvatsikos
    Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 2024, 22 : 1 - 4