Original vs. non-original abutments for screw-retained single implant crowns: An in vitro evaluation of internal fit, mechanical behaviour and screw loosening

被引:38
作者
Alonso-Perez, Raquel [1 ]
Bartolome, Jose F. [2 ]
Ferreiroa, Alberto [1 ]
Salido, Maria P. [1 ]
Pradies, Guillermo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Complutense Madrid, Dept Buccofacial Prosthesis, Fac Odontol, Madrid, Spain
[2] CSIC, ICMM, Madrid, Spain
关键词
biomaterials; material sciences; prosthodontics; FRACTURE-RESISTANCE; MARGINAL ACCURACY; ROTATIONAL MISFIT; MICROBIAL LEAKAGE; TORQUE VALUES; INTERFACE; MICROGAP; SURVIVAL; FATIGUE; CONNECTIONS;
D O I
10.1111/clr.13390
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives To assess the internal accuracy, mechanical behaviour under static load and screw loosening before and after cyclic loading of implant-supported crowns restored with original components or with two compatible non-original brands. Materials and Methods Sixty-three dental implants were divided into three groups (n = 21 each): Group 1 used original components, and groups 2 and 3 used non-original components. Internal accuracy was measured throughout a cross section of the sample groups (n = 8) using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to evaluate the fit for implant-abutments, implant-crowns and crown-abutments. To evaluate load-bearing capacity, eight samples from each group were loaded until fracture according to ISO Norm 14801. The removal torque value (RTV) was evaluated in the screws connecting the crown with the abutment and the abutment with the implant before and after cyclic loading (2 x 10(6) cycles) in five samples from each group. The data were analysed using the Kruskal-Wallis test (p < 0.05). Results Statistically significant differences were found among the mean crown-abutment gaps measured in Group 1 (9.3 mu m), Group 2 (45.4 mu m) and Group 3 (44.9 mu m). Higher values for mean load-bearing capacity were found in Group 1 (1,098 N) than in groups 2 and 3 (1,057 and 973 N, respectively); however, these differences were not statistically significant. Original abutment-implant screws exhibited lower percentages of torque reduction than the non-originals. Conclusions Enhanced fit is expected when original components are used. The original abutments exhibited lower percentages of torque reduction after cyclic loading than non-originals.
引用
收藏
页码:1230 / 1238
页数:9
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Comparison of Fit Accuracy between Procera Custom Abutments and Three Implant Systems (Withdrawn Publication)
    Alves da Cunha, Tiago de Morais
    Correia de Araujo, Roberto Paulo
    Barbosa da Rocha, Paulo Vicente
    Pazos Amoedo, Rosa Maria
    [J]. CLINICAL IMPLANT DENTISTRY AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2012, 14 (05) : 772 - 777
  • [2] PHOTOELASTIC STRESS ANALYSIS OF EXTERNAL VERSUS INTERNAL IMPLANT-ABUTMENT CONNECTIONS
    Asvanund, Pattapon
    Morgano, Steven M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2011, 106 (04) : 266 - 271
  • [3] Loosening torque of Universal Abutment screws after cyclic loading: influence of tightening technique and screw coating
    Bacchi, Atais
    Regalin, Alexandre
    Brilhante Bhering, Claudia Lopes
    Alessandretti, Rodrigo
    Spazzin, Aloisio Oro
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ADVANCED PROSTHODONTICS, 2015, 7 (05) : 375 - 379
  • [4] Baixe S, 2010, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V25, P455
  • [5] Baldassarri M, 2012, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V27, P537
  • [6] Bates J F, 1976, J Oral Rehabil, V3, P57, DOI 10.1111/j.1365-2842.1976.tb00929.x
  • [7] Binon PP, 1996, INT J PROSTHODONT, V9, P149
  • [8] Binon PP, 1996, INT J PROSTHODONT, V9, P511
  • [9] Torque removal evaluation of prosthetic screws after tightening and loosening cycles: an in vitro study
    Cardoso, Mayra
    Torres, Marcelo Ferreira
    Veras Lourenco, Eduardo Jose
    Telles, Daniel de Moraes
    Silveira Rodrigues, Renata Cristina
    Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria
    [J]. CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2012, 23 (04) : 475 - 480
  • [10] The response of bone in primates around unloaded dental implants supporting prostheses with different levels of fit
    Carr, AB
    Gerard, DA
    Larsen, PE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1996, 76 (05) : 500 - 509