Atmospheric stabilization and the timing of carbon mitigation

被引:16
作者
Mignone, Bryan K. [1 ]
Socolow, Robert H. [2 ]
Sarmiento, Jorge L. [3 ]
Oppenheimer, Michael [4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Brookings Inst, Foreign Policy Studies Program, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Princeton Univ, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[3] Princeton Univ, Atmospher & Ocean Sci Program, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[4] Princeton Univ, Woodrow Wilson Sch Publ & Int Affairs, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
[5] Princeton Univ, Dept Geosci, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1007/s10584-007-9391-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Stabilization of atmospheric CO2 concentrations below a pre-industrial doubling (similar to 550 ppm) is a commonly cited target in climate policy assessment. When the rate at which future emissions can fall is assumed to be fixed, the peak atmospheric concentration - or the stabilization "frontier" - is an increasing and convex function of the length of postponement. Here we find that a decline in emissions of 1% year(-1) beginning today would place the frontier near 475 ppm and that when mitigation is postponed, options disappear (on average) at the rate of similar to 9 ppm year(-1), meaning that delays of more than a decade will likely preclude stabilization below a doubling. When constraints on the future decline rate of emissions are relaxed, a particular atmospheric target can be realized in many ways, with scenarios that allow longer postponement of emissions reductions requiring greater increases in the intensity of future mitigation. However, the marginal rate of substitution between future mitigation and present delay becomes prohibitively large when the balance is shifted too far toward the future, meaning that some amount of postponement cannot be fully offset by simply increasing the intensity of future mitigation. Consequently, these results suggest that a practical transition path to a given stabilization target in the most commonly cited range can allow, at most, one or two decades of delay.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 265
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   Emission scenarios and global climate protection [J].
Alcamo, J ;
Kreileman, E .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 1996, 6 (04) :305-334
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, TRENDS
[3]   Climate change:: long-term targets and short-term commitments [J].
Corfee-Morlot, J ;
Höhne, N .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2003, 13 (04) :277-293
[4]   Defining and experiencing dangerous climate change -: An editorial essay [J].
Dessai, S ;
Adger, WN ;
Hulme, M ;
Turnpenny, J ;
Köhler, J ;
Warren, R .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2004, 64 (1-2) :11-25
[5]   Defusing the global warming time bomb [J].
Hansen, J .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 2004, 290 (03) :68-77
[6]   A slippery slope: How much global warming constitutes "dangerous anthropogenic interference"? [J].
Hansen, JE .
CLIMATIC CHANGE, 2005, 68 (03) :269-279
[7]   Climate change, coral bleaching and the future of the world's coral reefs [J].
Hoegh-Guldberg, O .
MARINE AND FRESHWATER RESEARCH, 1999, 50 (08) :839-866
[8]  
[Houghton J.T. IPCC. IPCC.], 2001, CLIMATE CHANGE
[9]   Central role of Southern Hemisphere winds and eddies in modulating the oceanic uptake of anthropogenic carbon [J].
Mignone, BK ;
Gnanadesikan, A ;
Sarmiento, JL ;
Slater, RD .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2006, 33 (01)
[10]   Climate change - Dangerous climate impacts and the Kyoto protocol [J].
O'Neill, BC ;
Oppenheimer, M .
SCIENCE, 2002, 296 (5575) :1971-1972