Comparison of activated carbon prepared from Jatropha hull by conventional heating and microwave heating

被引:111
作者
Duan Xin-hui [1 ,2 ]
Srinivasakannan, C. [3 ]
Peng Jin-hui [1 ,2 ]
Zhang li-Bo [1 ,2 ]
Zhang Zheng-yong [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Fac Mat & Met Engn, Kunming 650093, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[2] Kunming Univ Sci & Technol, Key Lab Unconvent Met, Kunming 650093, Yunnan, Peoples R China
[3] Petr Inst, Dept Chem Engn, Abu Dhabi, U Arab Emirates
关键词
Activated carbon; Jatropha hull; Microwave heating; Pore size distribution; Comparison; STEAM ACTIVATION; COCONUT SHELL; OPTIMIZATION; EXTRUSION; CURCAS; RICE; OIL; BIOMASS; ENERGY; CHARS;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.06.010
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
An attempt to compare the yield and porous nature of the activated carbon prepared using the conventional and microwave assisted heating, is the focus of the present work. Towards this Jatropha hull (a biomass precursor) is activated using the popular activating agents, steam and CO2 to assess the relative merit of activating agents and the heating methods. The process optimization exercise is carried out with the minimum number of experiments following the standard full factorial statistical design of experiments (RSM). The activated carbon prepared under the optimized conditions is compared based on the yield and porous nature. The yield of activated carbon is not found to vary significantly for the steam activation, irrespective of the heating method, while it is found to double using CO2 activation with microwave heating as compared to conventional heating. The pore volume and the surface area is found to double using the microwave heating with steam, while it is found to be of the same order of magnitude using CO2 activation. Although the porosity of carbon is of the same order of magnitude using CO2 activation, the activation temperature, the activation time, CO2 flow rate are significantly lower than the conventional heating rendering the process more economical than the conventional heating. The steam-carbon reaction rate is significantly higher than the carbon-CO2 reaction rate, rendering the time requiring for activation lesser using steam activation as compared to CO2 activation. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3920 / 3926
页数:7
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] Microwave-induced regeneration of activated carbons polluted with phenol.: A comparison with conventional thermal regeneration
    Ania, CO
    Menéndez, JA
    Parra, JB
    Pis, JJ
    [J]. CARBON, 2004, 42 (07) : 1383 - 1387
  • [2] Microwave technology for energy-efficient processing of waste
    Appleton, TJ
    Colder, RI
    Kingman, SW
    Lowndes, IS
    Read, AG
    [J]. APPLIED ENERGY, 2005, 81 (01) : 85 - 113
  • [3] Effect of steam activation on the porosity and chemical nature of activated carbons from Eucalyptus globulus and peach stones
    Arriagada, R
    Garcia, R
    MolinaSabio, M
    RodriguezReinoso, F
    [J]. MICROPOROUS MATERIALS, 1997, 8 (3-4): : 123 - 130
  • [4] Production of activated carbon from Luscar char: Experimental and modeling studies
    Azargohar, R
    Dalai, AK
    [J]. MICROPOROUS AND MESOPOROUS MATERIALS, 2005, 85 (03) : 219 - 225
  • [5] Optimization of conditions for the preparation of activated carbons from olive-waste cakes
    Baçaoui, A
    Yaacoubi, A
    Dahbi, A
    Bennouna, C
    Luu, RPT
    Maldonado-Hodar, FJ
    Rivera-Utrilla, J
    Moreno-Castilla, C
    [J]. CARBON, 2001, 39 (03) : 425 - 432
  • [6] EXTRUSION OF BLENDS OF RICE AND CHICK PEA FLOURS - A RESPONSE-SURFACE ANALYSIS
    BHATTACHARYA, S
    PRAKASH, M
    [J]. JOURNAL OF FOOD ENGINEERING, 1994, 21 (03) : 315 - 330
  • [7] BISIO C, 2008, MICROPOR MESOPOR MAT, V90, P107
  • [8] Cornell J. A., 1987, Response surface designs and analysis, V1st
  • [9] DUAN XH, 2011, ENERG SOURCE PART A, V33, P1
  • [10] Preparation of activated carbon from Jatropha hull with microwave heating: Optimization using response surface methodology
    Duan Xin-hui
    Srinivasakannan, C.
    Peng Jin-hui
    Zhang Li-bo
    Zhang Zheng-yong
    [J]. FUEL PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 92 (03) : 394 - 400