Diabetes in pregnancy may differentially affect neonatal outcomes for twins and singletons

被引:38
作者
Luo, Z. C. [1 ]
Simonet, F. [1 ]
Wei, S. Q. [1 ]
Xu, H. [1 ]
Rey, E. [1 ]
Fraser, W. D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, St Justine Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
5-min Apgar score; congenital anomalies; diabetes in pregnancy; neonatal death; twins; FETAL; GLUCOSE; WOMEN; MORTALITY; MELLITUS; TYPE-1;
D O I
10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03366.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Aim We tested the hypothesis that diabetes in pregnancy may differentially affect neonatal outcomes in twin vs. singleton pregnancies. Methods In a retrospective cohort analysis of twins (n = 422 068) and singletons (n = 14 298 367) born in the USA from 1998 to 2001, we evaluated the adjusted odds ratios of adverse neonatal outcomes comparing diabetic vs. non-diabetic pregnancies, controlling for maternal characteristics. Primary outcomes include macrosomia (birth weight for gestational age > 90th percentile), congenital anomalies, low 5-min Apgar score (< 4) and neonatal death. Results Diabetes in pregnancy was associated with a similarly increased risk of congenital anomalies (adjusted odds ratios 1.52 vs. 1.59) and smaller increased risks of preterm birth (adjusted odds ratios 1.27 vs. 1.49) and macrosomia (adjusted odds ratios 1.38 vs. 2.03) in twins vs. singletons, but reduced risks of low 5-min Apgar score (adjusted odds ratio 0.74) and neonatal death (adjusted odds ratio 0.76) in twins but not singletons. Conclusions Diabetes in pregnancy may differentially affect neonatal outcomes in twins and singletons, indicating a need for further studies to differentiate the effects by clinical subtypes of diabetes in pregnancy, and to consider/evaluate differential clinical management protocols of diabetes in multiple vs. singleton pregnancies.
引用
收藏
页码:1068 / 1073
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   A United States national reference for fetal growth [J].
Alexander, GR ;
Himes, JH ;
Kaufman, RB ;
Mor, J ;
Kogan, M .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 1996, 87 (02) :163-168
[2]  
American Diabetes Association, 2003, Diabetes Care, V26 Suppl 1, pS103
[3]   Pregnancy outcomes in women with gestational diabetes treated with metformin or insulin: a case-control study [J].
Balani, J. ;
Hyer, S. L. ;
Rodin, D. A. ;
Shehata, H. .
DIABETIC MEDICINE, 2009, 26 (08) :798-802
[4]  
Berkowitz K, 1997, J REPROD MED, V42, P793
[5]   Risk for gestational diabetes and hypertension for women with twin pregnancy compared to singleton pregnancy [J].
Kai J. Buhling ;
Wolfgang Henrich ;
Elizabeth Starr ;
Marion Lubke ;
Silke Bertram ;
Gerda Siebert ;
Joachim W. Dudenhausen .
Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics, 2003, 269 (1) :33-36
[6]   The continuing value of the apgar score for the assessment of newborn infants. [J].
Casey, BM ;
McIntire, DD ;
Leveno, KJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (07) :467-471
[7]  
*CDC NCHS, 2004, BIRTH COH LINK BIRTH
[8]   Reliability of birth certificate data: a multi-hospital comparison to medical records information. [J].
DiGiuseppe D.L. ;
Aron D.C. ;
Ranbom L. ;
Harper D.L. ;
Rosenthal G.E. .
Maternal and Child Health Journal, 2002, 6 (3) :169-179
[9]   THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF DIABETES AND PREGNANCY IN THE US, 1988 [J].
ENGELGAU, MM ;
HERMAN, WH ;
SMITH, PJ ;
GERMAN, RR ;
AUBERT, RE .
DIABETES CARE, 1995, 18 (07) :1029-1033
[10]   Gestational diabetes: A review of the current literature and guidelines [J].
Hollander, Martine H. ;
Paarlberg, K. Marieke ;
Huisjes, Anjoke J. M. .
OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2007, 62 (02) :125-136