Glenohumeral contact forces and muscle forces evaluated in wheelchair-related activities of daily living in able-bodied subjects versus subjects with paraplegia and tetraplegia

被引:65
作者
van Drongelen, S
van der Woude, LH
Janssen, TW
Angenot, EL
Chadwick, EK
Veeger, DJH
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Fac Human Movement Sci, Inst Fundamental & Clin Human Movement Sci, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Man Machine Syst & Control Grp, Delft, Netherlands
[3] Rehabil Ctr Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
[4] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[5] VA FES Ctr, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2005年 / 86卷 / 07期
关键词
activities of daily living; biomechanics; muscles; rehabilitation; shoulder; spinal cord injuries;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.014
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To estimate the differences in glenohumeral contact forces and shoulder muscle forces between able-bodied subjects and subjects with paraplegia and tetraplegia during wheelchair-related activities of daily living (ADLs). Design: Kinematics and external forces were measured during wheelchair ADLs (level propulsion, weight-relief lifting, reaching) and processed by using an inverse dynamics 3-dimensional biomechanical model. Setting: Biomechanics laboratory. Participants: Five able-bodied subjects, 8 subjects with paraplegia, and 4 subjects with tetraplegia (N=17). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Glenohumeral contact forces and shoulder muscle forces. Results: Peak contact forces were significantly higher for weight-relief lifting compared with reaching and level propulsion (P <.001). High relative muscle force of the rotator cuff was seen, apparently needed to stabilize the joint. For weight-relief lifting, total relative muscle force was significantly higher for the tetraplegia group than for the able-bodied group (P=.022). Conclusions: Glenohumeral contact forces were significantly higher for weight-relief lifting and highest over the 3 tasks for the tetraplegia group. Without taking paralysis into account, more muscle force was estimated for the subjects with tetraplegia during weight-relief lifting. (c) 2005 by American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
引用
收藏
页码:1434 / 1440
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   Preserving transfer independence among individuals with spinal cord injury [J].
Nyland, J ;
Quigley, P ;
Huang, C ;
Lloyd, J ;
Harrow, J ;
Nelson, A .
SPINAL CORD, 2000, 38 (11) :649-657
[12]  
PASCOAL AG, 2001, THESIS U TECHNICA LI
[13]   Electromyographic analysis of the shoulder muscles during depression transfers in subjects with low-level paraplegia [J].
Perry, J ;
Gronley, JK ;
Newsam, CJ ;
Reyes, ML ;
Mulroy, SJ .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1996, 77 (04) :350-355
[14]   ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF SHOULDER MUSCLES OF MEN WITH LOW-LEVEL PARAPLEGIA DURING A WEIGHT RELIEF RAISE [J].
REYES, ML ;
GRONLEY, JK ;
NEWSAM, CJ ;
MULROY, SJ ;
PERRY, J .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1995, 76 (05) :433-439
[15]  
Richter WM, 2004, J REHABIL RES DEV S2, V41, P18
[16]  
van der Helm FCT, 1997, P 1 C INT SHOULD GRO, P7
[17]   Mechanical load on the upper extremity during wheelchair activities [J].
van Drongelen, S ;
van der Woude, LH ;
Janssen, TW ;
Angenot, EL ;
Chadwick, EK ;
Veeger, DJH .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 2005, 86 (06) :1214-1220
[18]  
VANDERHELM FC, 1997, P 1 C INT SHOULD GRO, P65
[19]   Parameters for modeling the upper extremity [J].
Veeger, HEJ ;
Yu, B ;
An, KN ;
Rozendal, RH .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1997, 30 (06) :647-652
[20]   Load on the shoulder in low intensity wheelchair propulsion [J].
Veeger, HEJ ;
Rozendaal, LA ;
van der Helm, FCT .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2002, 17 (03) :211-218