A Meta-Analysis on the Effects of Text Structure Instruction on Reading Comprehension in the Upper Elementary Grades

被引:51
作者
Bogaerds-Hazenberg, Suzanne T. M. [1 ]
Evers-Vermeul, Jacqueline [2 ]
van den Bergh, Huub [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Utrecht Inst Linguist OTS, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Utrecht, Dept Languages Literature & Commun, Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Comprehension; Instructional strategies; methods and materials; Assessment; Text Structure; Informational Text; Narrative Text; Summarizing; Meta-Analysis; 2-Childhood; GRAPHIC ORGANIZERS; STRUCTURE STRATEGY; LEARNING-DISABILITIES; STUDENTS; READERS; INTERVENTION; KNOWLEDGE; MEMORY; MODEL; 5TH;
D O I
10.1002/rrq.311
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
In this meta-analysis, the authors synthesize results from 44 (quasi-)experimental studies on informational and narrative text structure interventions involving students in grades 4-6 in regular school settings. Findings show that text structure instruction had positive immediate effects on students' reading comprehension but that effect sizes varied largely across outcome measures: questions (Hedges' g = 0.25), summarization (g = 0.57), recall (g = 0.37), and knowledge about text structure (g = 0.38). However, students who received text structure instruction no longer outperformed control groups at delayed posttests. Content-related features, such as a focus on paragraph-level structure, active construction of graphic organizers, and teaching rule-based summarization techniques, moderated the effectiveness of text structure instruction, but these effects also varied across outcome measures. Instructional features moderated delayed effects: Interventions with opportunities for individual student practice resulted in higher delayed effects for comprehension questions. The authors argue that text structure instruction deserves a place in the primary school curriculum so the positive effects on reading will be maintained.
引用
收藏
页码:435 / 462
页数:28
相关论文
共 162 条
  • [81] TOWARD A MODEL OF TEXT COMPREHENSION AND PRODUCTION
    KINTSCH, W
    VANDIJK, TA
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1978, 85 (05) : 363 - 394
  • [82] Kintsch W., 2013, Theoretical models and processes of reading, P807
  • [83] Kostons D., 2014, ZELFGESTUURD LEREN O
  • [84] TEACHERS' SPECIALIZED KNOWLEDGE FOR SUPPORTING STUDENT COMPREHENSION IN TEXT-BASED DISCUSSIONS
    Kucan, Linda
    Hapgood, Susanna
    Palincsar, Annemarie Sullivan
    [J]. ELEMENTARY SCHOOL JOURNAL, 2011, 112 (01) : 61 - 82
  • [85] Cognitive load and science text comprehension: Effects of drawing and mentally imagining text content
    Leutner, Detlev
    Leopold, Claudia
    Sumfleth, Elke
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2009, 25 (02) : 284 - 289
  • [86] Lipsey M.W., 2012, TRANSLATING STAT REP
  • [87] REMEMBRANCE OF THINGS PAST - STORY STRUCTURE AND RECALL
    MANDLER, JM
    [J]. COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 9 (01) : 111 - 151
  • [88] Manoli P., 2012, Creative Education, V3, P348, DOI [https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2012.33055, DOI 10.4236/CE.2012.33055, 10.4236/ce.2012.33055]
  • [89] Mayer R.E., 2008, Learning and instruction, V2nd, P462
  • [90] McDermott M.B., 1991, THESIS