Long-term pilot scale investigation of novel hybrid ultrafiltration-osmotic membrane bioreactors

被引:114
作者
Holloway, Ryan W. [1 ]
Wait, Andrew S. [1 ]
da Silva, Aline Fernandes [1 ]
Herron, Jack [2 ]
Schutter, Mark D. [2 ]
Lampi, Keith [2 ]
Cath, Tzahi Y. [1 ]
机构
[1] Colorado Sch Mines, Golden, CO 80401 USA
[2] Hydrat Technol Innovat, Albany, OR USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
Membrane bioreactor; Forward osmosis; Osmotic MBR; Nutrient recovery; Salt rejection; Direct potable reuse; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; PROCESS PERFORMANCE; OSMOSIS; REMOVAL; REUSE; REJECTION; ENERGY; MBR; PRETREATMENT; SALINITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.desal.2014.05.040
中图分类号
TQ [化学工业];
学科分类号
0817 ;
摘要
An osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) and a novel hybrid ultrafiltration OMBR (UFO-MBR) were investigated for extended time. In OMBR, water is drawn by osmosis from activated sludge through a forward osmosis (FO) membrane into a draw solution. OMBRs provide superior rejection of dissolved constituents, including salts and nutrients, compared to conventional UF MBRs, and the FO membranes in OMBR have low fouling propensity. Yet, the high rejection of dissolved constituents in OMBR results in accumulation of salts and nutrients in the activated sludge, with potential detrimental effects on the biological processes. A new strategy for mitigating salt accumulation was investigated using a UF membrane in parallel to the FO membrane in the same bioreactor (UFO-MBR). Results from long-term OMBR and UFO-MBR investigations revealed that the overall removal of chemical oxygen demand, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus were greater than 96%, 82%, and 99%, respectively. We have demonstrated that low salinity in the activated sludge could be maintained, that phosphorus could be recovered through the UF permeate at concentrations greater than 50 mg L-1, and that FO membrane fouling was substantially reduced. Additionally, the UFO-MBR was capable of simultaneously producing high quality RO permeate stream and nutrient-rich UF permeate stream from one integrated system. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 74
页数:11
相关论文
共 46 条
  • [1] The forward osmosis membrane bioreactor: A low fouling alternative to MBR processes
    Achilli, Andrea
    Cath, Tzahi Y.
    Marchand, Eric A.
    Childress, Amy E.
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2009, 239 (1-3) : 10 - 21
  • [2] Performance of a novel osmotic membrane bioreactor (OMBR) system: Flux stability and removal of trace organics
    Alturki, Abdulhakeem
    McDonald, James
    Khan, Stuart J.
    Hai, Faisal I.
    Price, William E.
    Nghiem, Long D.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 113 : 201 - 206
  • [3] Removal of trace organic contaminants by the forward osmosis process
    Alturki, Abdulhakeem Ali
    McDonald, James A.
    Khan, Stuart J.
    Price, William E.
    Nghiem, Long D.
    Elimelech, Menachem
    [J]. SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2013, 103 : 258 - 266
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2013, FILMTEC SW30-2540
  • [5] Wastewater reuse after treatment by tertiary ultrafiltration and a membrane bioreactor (MBR): a comparative study
    Arevalo, Juan
    Garralon, Gloria
    Plaza, Fidel
    Moreno, Begona
    Perez, Jorge
    Angel Gomez, Miguel
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2009, 243 (1-3) : 32 - 41
  • [6] Critical and sustainable fluxes: Theory, experiments and applications
    Bacchin, P.
    Aimar, P.
    Field, R. W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 281 (1-2) : 42 - 69
  • [7] The importance of fluid dynamics for MBR fouling mitigation
    Boehm, Lutz
    Drews, Anja
    Prieske, Helmut
    Berube, Pierre R.
    Kraume, Matthias
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 122 : 50 - 61
  • [8] Organic ionic salt draw solutions for osmotic membrane bioreactors
    Bowden, Katie S.
    Achilli, Andrea
    Childress, Amy E.
    [J]. BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2012, 122 : 207 - 216
  • [9] Comparison of MF/UF pretreatment with conventional filtration prior to RO membranes for surface seawater desalination
    Brehant, A
    Bonnelye, V
    Perez, M
    [J]. DESALINATION, 2002, 144 (1-3) : 353 - 360
  • [10] Cath T.Y., 2013, 6175195 USPTO, Patent No. 61/751,195