Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Aortic Root Replacement - A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:24
作者
Harky, Amer [1 ]
Al-Adhami, Ahmed [2 ]
Chan, Jeffrey S. K. [3 ]
Wong, Chris H. M. [3 ]
Bashir, Mohamad [4 ]
机构
[1] Countess Chester Hosp, Dept Vasc Surg, Chester, Cheshire, England
[2] Golden Jubilee Natl Hosp, Dept Cardiothorac Surg, Glasgow, Lanark, Scotland
[3] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Fac Med, Shatin, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
[4] Manchester Royal Infirm, Manchester, Lancs, England
关键词
Aortic surgery; Mini access; Aortic root replacement; Mini-sternotomy; VALVE-REPLACEMENT; LEARNING-CURVE; SURGERY; OUTCOMES; ACCESS; MINISTERNOTOMY; STERNOTOMY;
D O I
10.1016/j.hlc.2018.10.023
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background Mini-sternotomy has been proven superior to full sternotomy in aortic valve replacement by providing better perioperative outcomes. We investigated whether such technique provides better outcomes in patients undergoing aortic root surgery. Methods A comprehensive electronic literature search was undertaken among the four major databases (PubMed, Ovid, Scopus and EMBASE) to identify all published studies up to June 2018. The search terms used related to mini-sternotomy versus full sternotomy, aortic root, valve sparing, Bentall procedure. Only articles that compared mini against full sternotomy were considered in this analysis. After excluding articles based on title or abstract, the full text articles selected had reference lists searched for any potential further articles to be included in this review. Results A total of 2,765 patients were analysed from across eight comparative studies that were included in the quantitative analysis of the parameters of interest that fulfilled the criteria for meta-analysis. Mini-sternotomy aortic root replacement was associated with significantly shorter cardiopulmonary bypass time (p = 0.009), lower rate of blood transfusion (p = 0.01). additionally, they had lower operative mortality (p = 0.02), and shorter stay at intensive care and at hospital (p = 0.0009, p = 0.03 respectively). However, there was no difference between mini-sternotomy and conventional aortic root replacement in terms of aortic cross-clamp time (p = 0.28), total operation time (p = 0.31), re-exploration rate for bleeding (p = 0.28), stroke rate (p = 0.90), wound infection rate (p = 0.96), and length of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.10). Conclusion Mini-sternotomy is a safe, feasible alternative option to full sternotomy in aortic root repair. However, the significant heterogeneity in data points to the need for a larger, well-designed trial to support the currently limited literature evidences.
引用
收藏
页码:1841 / 1851
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], INTERACT CARDIOVASC
[2]   Less invasive versus conventional double-valve surgery: A propensity-matched comparison [J].
Atik, Fernando A. ;
Svensson, Lars G. ;
Blackstone, Eugene H. ;
Gillinov, A. Marc ;
Rajeswaran, Jeevanantham ;
Lytle, Bruce W. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2011, 141 (06) :1461-U167
[3]   Aortic root replacement: comparison of clinical outcome between different surgical techniques [J].
Badiu, Catalin Constantin ;
Deutsch, Marcus Andre ;
Sideris, Constantinos ;
Krane, Markus ;
Hettich, Ina ;
Voss, Bernhard ;
Mazzitelli, Domenico ;
Lange, Ruediger .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CARDIO-THORACIC SURGERY, 2014, 46 (04) :685-692
[4]   Ministernotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Brown, Morgan L. ;
McKellar, Stephen H. ;
Sundt, Thoralf M. ;
Schaff, Hartzell V. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2009, 137 (03) :670-U215
[5]  
Doll N, 2002, ANN THORAC SURG, V74, pS1318
[6]   Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: state of the art and future directions [J].
Glauber, Mattia ;
Ferrarini, Matteo ;
Miceli, Antonio .
ANNALS OF CARDIOTHORACIC SURGERY, 2015, 4 (01) :26-32
[7]   The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection (IRAD) - New insights into an old disease [J].
Hagan, PG ;
Nienaber, CA ;
Isselbacher, EM ;
Bruckman, D ;
Karavite, DJ ;
Russman, PL ;
Evangelista, A ;
Fattori, R ;
Suzuki, T ;
Oh, JK ;
Moore, AG ;
Malouf, JF ;
Pape, LA ;
Gaca, C ;
Sechtem, U ;
Lenferink, S ;
Deutsch, HJ ;
Diedrichs, H ;
Robles, JMY ;
Llovet, A ;
Gilon, D ;
Das, SK ;
Armstrong, WF ;
Deeb, GM ;
Eagle, KA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 283 (07) :897-903
[8]  
HAMILTON A, 1994, CAN J CARDIOL, V10, P721
[9]   Minimally Invasive Aortic Root Replacement with Valved Conduits through Partial Upper Sternotomy [J].
Hillebrand, Julia ;
Alshakaki, Mosab ;
Martens, Sven ;
Scherer, Mirela .
THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGEON, 2018, 66 (04) :295-300
[10]   Effects of institutional volumes on operative outcomes for aortic root replacement in North America [J].
Hughes, G. Chad ;
Zhao, Yue ;
Rankin, J. Scott ;
Scarborough, John E. ;
O'Brien, Sean ;
Bavaria, Joseph E. ;
Wolfe, Walter G. ;
Gaca, Jeffrey G. ;
Gammie, James S. ;
Shahian, David M. ;
Smith, Peter K. .
JOURNAL OF THORACIC AND CARDIOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 145 (01) :166-170