Deep Brain Stimulation of the Ventral Intermediate Nucleus of the Thalamus for Tremor in Patients With Multiple Sclerosis

被引:40
|
作者
Torres, Cristina V.
Moro, Elena [2 ]
Lopez-Rios, Adriana-Lucia
Hodaie, Mojgan
Chen, Robert
Laxton, Adrian W.
Hutchison, William D.
Dostrovsky, Jonathan O. [3 ]
Lozano, Andres M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Div Neurosurg, Dept Surg,Univ Hlth Network, Toronto Western Res Inst,Toronto Western Hosp, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Movement Disorders Ctr, Div Neurol, Toronto Western Hosp,Univ Hlth Network, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
[3] Univ Toronto, Dept Physiol, Toronto Western Res Inst, Toronto Western Hosp, Toronto, ON M5T 2S8, Canada
关键词
Deep brain stimulation; Multiple sclerosis; Tremor; TERM-FOLLOW-UP; CHRONIC ELECTRICAL-STIMULATION; QUALITY-OF-LIFE; MOVEMENT-DISORDERS; ZONA INCERTA; THALAMOTOMY; SUPPRESSION; TARGET;
D O I
10.1227/01.NEU.0000375506.18902.3E
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: Tremor is an important cause of disability in patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus is said to be beneficial for MS tremor. OBJECTIVE: To assess the long-term efficacy of VIM DBS for MS disabling tumor. METHODS: We treated 10 patients (4 men and 6 women) with advanced MS-related medication-resistant tremor with DBS at the VIM thalamic nucleus. DBS was unilateral in 9 patients and bilateral in 1 patient in 2 stages. Contralateral arm tremor was assessed with the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale. RESULTS: At 1 year, 5 of 10 patients (5 of 11 hemispheres) had a reduction in tremor scores with stimulation compared with baseline; in 3 patients, the reduction was > 50%. After 36 months, 3 patients continued benefiting from stimulation, 2 having > 50% improvement. Of the 6 symptomatic sides that did not benefit at 1 year, 3 failed to have even initial benefit, and 3 had a transient improvement lasting < 1 year. One patient stopped using stimulation because of a lack of improvement at 5 months after surgery and was lost to follow-up. CONCLUSION: Approximately one-half of the patients derived some benefit from VIM DBS 1 year after surgery, but this benefit reached a > 50% reduction in only 30% of the patients. This level of improvement may be related to the variability of the demyelinating lesions and the superimposition of ataxia in the MS patients. Developing better treatments for MS tremor continues to be a challenge.
引用
收藏
页码:646 / 651
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Dual electrodethalamic deep brain stimulation for the treatment of posttraumatic and multiple sclerosis tremor
    Foote, KD
    Seignourel, P
    Fernandez, HH
    Romrell, J
    Whidden, E
    Jacobson, C
    Rodriguez, RL
    Okun, MS
    NEUROSURGERY, 2006, 58 (04) : 280 - 285
  • [42] Treatment of the ventral intermediate nucleus for medically refractory tremor: A cost-analysis of stereotactic radiosurgery versus deep brain stimulation
    McClelland, Shearwood, III
    Jaboin, Jerry J.
    RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2017, 125 (01) : 136 - 139
  • [43] Reoperation of Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients with Essential Tremor
    Lozano, Andres M.
    Levy, Ron
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2012, 78 (05) : 442 - 444
  • [44] Bilateral thalamic deep brain stimulation for essential tremor in elderly patients
    Klein, Johann
    Buentjen, Lars
    Jacobi, Gerrit
    Galazky, Imke
    Panther, Patricia
    Zaehle, Tino
    Kaufmann, Joern
    Heinze, Hans-Jochen
    Voges, Juergen
    Kupsch, Andreas
    JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION, 2017, 124 (09) : 1093 - 1096
  • [45] Benefits and risks of unilateral and bilateral ventral intermediate nucleus deep brain stimulation for axial essential tremor symptoms
    Mitchell, Kyle T.
    Larson, Paul
    Starr, Philip A.
    Okun, Michael S.
    Wharen, Robert E., Jr.
    Uitti, Ryan J.
    Guthrie, Barton L.
    Peichel, DeLea
    Pahwa, Rajesh
    Walker, Harrison C.
    Foote, Kelly
    Marshall, Frederick J.
    Jankovic, Joseph
    Simpson, Richard
    Phibbs, Fenna
    Neimat, Joseph S.
    Stewart, R. Malcolm
    Dashtipour, Khashayar
    Ostrem, Jill L.
    PARKINSONISM & RELATED DISORDERS, 2019, 60 : 126 - 132
  • [46] Predictors of deep brain stimulation outcome in tremor patients
    Sandoe, Claire
    Krishna, Vibhor
    Basha, Diellor
    Sammartino, Francesco
    Tatsch, Joao
    Picillo, Marina
    di Biase, Lazzaro
    Poon, Yu-Yan
    Hamani, Clement
    Reddy, Duemani
    Munhoz, Renato P.
    Lozano, Andres M.
    Hutchison, William D.
    Fasano, Alfonso
    BRAIN STIMULATION, 2018, 11 (03) : 592 - 599
  • [47] Deep brain stimulation for multiple sclerosis tremor: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zali, Alireza
    Khoshnood, Reza Jalili
    Motavaf, Mahsa
    Salimi, Alireza
    Akhlaghdoust, Meisam
    Safari, Saeid
    Ghajarzadeh, Mahsa
    Mirmosayyeb, Omid
    MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS AND RELATED DISORDERS, 2021, 56
  • [48] Combined Deep Brain Stimulation of Subthalamic Nucleus and Ventral Intermediate Thalamic Nucleus in Tremor-Dominant Parkinson's Disease Using a Parietal Approach
    Neudorfer, Clemens
    Hinzke, Markus
    Hunsche, Stefan
    El Majdoub, Faycal
    Lozano, Andres
    Maarouf, Mohammad
    NEUROMODULATION, 2019, 22 (04): : 493 - 502
  • [49] Combination targeting of subthalamic nucleus and ventral intermediate thalamic nucleus with a single trajectory in deep brain stimulation for tremor-dominant Parkinson's disease
    Fayed, Islam
    Cobourn, Kelsey D.
    Pivazyan, Gnel
    Torres-Yaghi, Yasar A.
    Pagan, Fernando L.
    Lo, Steven E.
    Mandir, Allen S.
    Kalhorn, Christopher G.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2021, 85 : 92 - 100
  • [50] Post-deep brain stimulation — gradual non-stimulation dependent decrease in strength with attenuation of multiple sclerosis tremor
    J. A. Hyam
    T. Z. Aziz
    P. G. Bain
    Journal of Neurology, 2007, 254 : 854 - 860