Comparisons of the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for large angiomyolipomas: a propensity score-matched analysis

Objective To compare the safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) for large angiomyolipomas (AMLs). Materials and methods We retrospectively evaluated 150 patients who were treated with either RAPN or LPN for large angiomyolipomas from 2014 to 2018. Propensity score matching was performed on age, gender, BMI, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tumour side and size, preoperative eGFR and RENAL score. Results In total, 63 and 87 patients underwent RAPNs and LPNs, respectively. There were more large and complex AMLs in the RAPN cohort, with the median tumour maximal diameters and RENAL scores differing between the two groups (8 versus 7 cm and 9 versus 8, P = 0.01). After matching, the median warm ischemic time was significantly shorter in the RAPNs versus the LPNs (17 versus 22 min, P = 0.001). The rate of intraoperative complications in the RAPNs appeared lower than the LPNs (3.2% versus 8.1%). The median postoperative length of stay was significantly shorter in the RAPN cohort than the LPNs (P = 0.001). Twelve months after surgery, RAPNs received a 94.6% renal function prevention; while this was 90.8% in LPNs (P = 0.001). Subgroup analysis indicated that prior selective arterial embolization (SAE) was related to better renal function preservation in the RAPN cohort (P = 0.01). No recurrence occurred in either of the two cohorts. Conclusions RAPN is a safe and effective alternative to LPNs for large AMLs with a shorter warm ischemic time and higher renal preservation rate. Recurrence was equivalent in both RAPNs and LPNs.