Prospective cohort comparison of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy versus chemotherapy in patients with oesophageal cancer

被引:30
作者
Morgan, M. A. [1 ]
Lewis, W. G. [1 ,2 ]
Crosby, T. D. L. [3 ]
Escofet, X. [1 ]
Roberts, S. A. [1 ]
Brewster, A. E. [3 ]
Harvard, T. J. [4 ]
Clark, G. W. B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wales Hosp, Cardiff & Vale NHS Trust, SE Wales Canc Network, Cardiff CF14 4XW, Wales
[2] Royal Gwent Hosp, Newport, Gwent, Wales
[3] Velindre Hosp, Cardiff, Wales
[4] Royal Glamorgan Hosp, Llantrisant, Wales
关键词
D O I
10.1002/bjs.5671
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Chemotherapy and chemoradiotherapy are common neoadjuvant treatments for resectable T3 N0-1 M0 oesophageal carcinoma. The aim of this study was to compare the outcomes of these therapies in consecutive cohorts of patients. Methods: Between January 1998 and December 2001, 88 patients received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (two cycles of cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), prior to 45 Gy in 25 F concurrent radiotherapy with cisplatin and 5-FU). From 2002, 117 patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (76 patients had two cycles of cisplatin and 41 had four cycles of epirubicin, cisplatin and 5-FU). The primary outcome measure was survival, and analysis was by intention to treat. Results: Postoperative morbidity and mortality rates were 56 per cent (40 patients) and 10 per cent (seven patients) respectively in the chemoradiotherapy group, compared with 47 per cent (46 patients) and I per cent (one patient) in the chemotherapy group (P = 0.008). The cumulative 5-year survival rate by intention to treat was 35 per cent after chemoradiotherapy versus 21 per cent after chemotherapy (P = 0.188). The cumulative corrected 5-year survival rate after completed treatment was 44 per cent for chemoradiotherapy compared with 25 per cent for chemotherapy (P = 0.032). Conclusion: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy should remain an option for patients with satisfactory performance status.
引用
收藏
页码:1509 / 1514
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
Altman DG., 1990, PRACTICAL STAT MED R
[2]  
Bancewicz J, 2002, LANCET, V359, P1727
[3]   Chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone in squamous-cell cancer of the esophagus [J].
Bosset, JF ;
Gignoux, M ;
Triboulet, JP ;
Tiret, E ;
Mantion, G ;
Elias, D ;
Lozach, P ;
Ollier, JC ;
Pavy, JJ ;
Mercier, M ;
Sahmoud, T .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (03) :161-167
[4]   Surgery alone versus chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery for resectable cancer of the oesophagus: a randomised controlled phase III trial [J].
Burmeister, BH ;
Smithers, BM ;
Gebski, V ;
Fitzgerald, L ;
Simes, RJ ;
Devitt, P ;
Ackland, S ;
Gotley, DC ;
Joseph, D ;
Millar, J ;
North, J ;
Walpole, ET ;
Denham, JW .
LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2005, 6 (09) :659-668
[5]   NONPARAMETRIC-ESTIMATION FROM INCOMPLETE OBSERVATIONS [J].
KAPLAN, EL ;
MEIER, P .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1958, 53 (282) :457-481
[6]   Chemotherapy followed by surgery compared with surgery alone for localized esophageal cancer [J].
Kelsen, DP ;
Ginsberg, R ;
Pajak, TF ;
Sheahan, DG ;
Gunderson, L ;
Mortimer, J ;
Estes, N ;
Haller, DG ;
Ajani, J ;
Kocha, W ;
Minsky, BD ;
Roth, JA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (27) :1979-1984
[7]   THE UNIFIED INTERNATIONAL GASTRIC-CANCER STAGING CLASSIFICATION-SYSTEM [J].
KENNEDY, BJ .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 1987, 22 :11-13
[9]   Pilot study of preoperative combined modality treatment for locally advanced operable oesophageal carcinoma: Toxicities and long-term outcome [J].
Mukherjee, S ;
Abraham, J ;
Brewster, A ;
Hardwick, R ;
Havard, T ;
Lewis, W ;
Askill, C ;
Manson, J ;
Williams, GT ;
Roberts, SA ;
Court, J ;
Crosby, T .
CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 18 (04) :338-344
[10]  
National Cancer Institute, COMM TERM CRIT ADV E