Communication Supports and Best Practices Ensuring People With Aphasia Have an Effective Means of Expressing Needs and Wishes

被引:5
作者
King, Julia M. [1 ]
Simmons-Mackie, Nina [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Sch Commun Sci & Disorders, 1901 4th Ave, Stevens Point, WI 54481 USA
[2] Southeastern Louisiana Univ, Dept Commun Sci & Disorders, Hammond, LA 70402 USA
关键词
aphasia; communication; intervention; participation; READING-COMPREHENSION; IMPACT; AAC;
D O I
10.1097/TLD.0000000000000135
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
When people with aphasia have difficulty communicating, there is a risk for miscommunication and negative outcomes related to medical care and safety (Blackstone, Beukelman, & Yorkston, 2015). This risk can be reduced by ensuring that each person with aphasia can communicate effectively when using different types of discourse and at different points in the rehabilitation process. People with aphasia may need communication supports, which could entail use of any intervention program, technique, strategy, training, or modification that supplements their receptive and expressive language skills to increase communicative effectiveness. Effective communication is addressed in best practice recommendations and guidelines for aphasia as well as The Joint Commission Standards for Patient-Centered Communication (Aphasia United, 2014; NHMRC AARP, 2014; N. Simmons-Mackie et al., 2017; The Joint Commission, 2010). This article summarizes how incorporating communication supports into varied forms of discourse and all aspects of aphasia rehabilitation and care aligns with best clinical practices and national accreditation requirements.
引用
收藏
页码:348 / 360
页数:13
相关论文
共 43 条
  • [1] *AM SPEECH LANG HE, INTR EV BAS PRACT
  • [2] American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, 2011, NAT OUTC MEAS SYST A
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2010, Advancing effective communication, cultural competence, and patient- and family-centered care: A roadmap for hospitals
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2016, SCOPE PRACTICE SPEEC
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2005, EVIDENCE BASED PRACT
  • [6] Aphasia Institute, WHAT IS APH
  • [7] Aphasia United, 2014, BEST PRACT REC APH P
  • [8] Beukelman, 2015, PATIENT PROVIDER COM
  • [9] Beukelman D., 2015, PATIENT PROVIDER COM
  • [10] Beukelman D., 2012, PERSPECTIVENEUROPH, V22, P119