Concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Gemcitabine versus 5-fluorouracil, a randomized controlled study

被引:153
作者
Li, CP
Chao, Y
Chi, KH
Chan, WK
Teng, HC
Lee, RC
Chang, FY
Lee, SD
Yen, SH
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Ctr Canc, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Inst Clin Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2003年 / 57卷 / 01期
关键词
5-fluorouracil; gemcitabine; pancreatic cancer; chemoradiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00435-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine (GEM)-concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) vs. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) CCRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods and Materials: Thirty-four patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were studied. Eighteen patients were randomized to receive GEM CCRT (600 mg/m(2)/wk for 6 weeks) and 16 patients to receive bolus 5-FU CCRT (500 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days repeated every 2 weeks for 6 weeks). All patients were to receive 3D-CRT 50.4-61.2 Gy at 1.8-Gy/d fractions and GEM (1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks repeated every 4 weeks) after RT. Results: The median survival and median time to progression were 14.5 months and 7.1 months for the GEM CCRT group and 6.7 months and 2.7 months for the 5-FU CCRT group (p = 0.027 and p = 0.019, respectively). The quality-adjusted life month survival time was 11.2 +/- 0.5 months for GEM CCRT and 6.0 +/- 0.3 months for 5-FU CCRT patients (p < 0.001). The response rate was 50% (four complete responses and five partial responses) for GEM CCRT and 13% (two partial responses) for 5-FU CCRT (p = 0.005). Pain control was 39% for GEM CCRT and 6% for 5-FU CCRT (p = 0.043). Grade 3-4 neutropenia (34% vs. 19%), thrombocytopenia (0% vs. 7%), nausea (33 % vs. 31 %), vomiting (17 % vs. 19 %), hospitalization days per month of survival (7.4 +/- 1.7 days vs. 8.0 +/- 1.3 days), and full dose of RT received (78 % vs. 75 %) were not significantly different between the GEM CCRT and 5-FU CCRT patients. Conclusion: GEM CCRT appears more effective than 5-FU CCRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and has comparable tolerability. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 104
页数:7
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]  
National Comprehensive Cancer Network, 1997, ONCOLOGY, V11, P41
[22]   Phase I study of twice-weekly gemcitabine and concomitant external-beam radiotherapy in patients with adenocarcinoma of the pancreas [J].
Pipas, JM ;
Mitchell, SE ;
Barth, RJ ;
Vera-Gimon, R ;
Rathmann, J ;
Meyer, LP ;
Wagman, RS ;
Lewis, LD ;
McDonnell, C ;
Colacchio, TA ;
Perez, RP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2001, 50 (05) :1317-1322
[23]  
Plunkett W, 1996, SEMIN ONCOL, V23, P3
[24]   Phase I study of weekly gemcitabine as a radiation sensitizer for unresectable pancreatic cancer [J].
Poggi, MM ;
Kroog, GS ;
Russo, A ;
Muir, C ;
Cook, J ;
Smith, J ;
Mitchell, JB ;
Herscher, LL .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2002, 54 (03) :670-676
[25]   Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group phase I trial of protracted venous infusion fluorouracil plus weekly gemcitabine with concurrent radiation therapy in patients with locally advanced pancreas cancer: A regimen with unexpected early toxicity [J].
Talamonti, MS ;
Catalano, PJ ;
Vaughn, DJ ;
Whittington, R ;
Beauchamp, RD ;
Berlin, J ;
Benson, AB .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 18 (19) :3384-3389
[26]  
Wolff RA, 2001, CLIN CANCER RES, V7, P2246