Concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Gemcitabine versus 5-fluorouracil, a randomized controlled study

被引:151
|
作者
Li, CP
Chao, Y
Chi, KH
Chan, WK
Teng, HC
Lee, RC
Chang, FY
Lee, SD
Yen, SH
机构
[1] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Ctr Canc, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[2] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[3] Taipei Vet Gen Hosp, Dept Radiol, Taipei 11217, Taiwan
[4] Natl Yang Ming Univ, Sch Med, Inst Clin Med, Taipei 112, Taiwan
关键词
5-fluorouracil; gemcitabine; pancreatic cancer; chemoradiotherapy;
D O I
10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00435-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of gemcitabine (GEM)-concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) vs. 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) CCRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer. Methods and Materials: Thirty-four patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer were studied. Eighteen patients were randomized to receive GEM CCRT (600 mg/m(2)/wk for 6 weeks) and 16 patients to receive bolus 5-FU CCRT (500 mg/m(2)/d for 3 days repeated every 2 weeks for 6 weeks). All patients were to receive 3D-CRT 50.4-61.2 Gy at 1.8-Gy/d fractions and GEM (1000 mg/m(2) weekly for 3 weeks repeated every 4 weeks) after RT. Results: The median survival and median time to progression were 14.5 months and 7.1 months for the GEM CCRT group and 6.7 months and 2.7 months for the 5-FU CCRT group (p = 0.027 and p = 0.019, respectively). The quality-adjusted life month survival time was 11.2 +/- 0.5 months for GEM CCRT and 6.0 +/- 0.3 months for 5-FU CCRT patients (p < 0.001). The response rate was 50% (four complete responses and five partial responses) for GEM CCRT and 13% (two partial responses) for 5-FU CCRT (p = 0.005). Pain control was 39% for GEM CCRT and 6% for 5-FU CCRT (p = 0.043). Grade 3-4 neutropenia (34% vs. 19%), thrombocytopenia (0% vs. 7%), nausea (33 % vs. 31 %), vomiting (17 % vs. 19 %), hospitalization days per month of survival (7.4 +/- 1.7 days vs. 8.0 +/- 1.3 days), and full dose of RT received (78 % vs. 75 %) were not significantly different between the GEM CCRT and 5-FU CCRT patients. Conclusion: GEM CCRT appears more effective than 5-FU CCRT for locally advanced pancreatic cancer and has comparable tolerability. (C) 2003 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:98 / 104
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Concurrent chemoradiotherapy treatment of locally advanced pancreatic cancer: Gemcitabine versus 5-fluorouracil, a randomized controlled study. Response
    Crane, CH
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 58 (03): : 1009 - 1009
  • [2] Concurrent Full Dose Gemcitabine versus Concurrent 5-Fluorouracil Chemoradiotherapy for Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer
    Rakhra, S. S.
    Chung, A.
    Helenowski, I.
    Mulcahy, M.
    Hayes, J.
    Small, W.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2011, 81 (02): : S337 - S337
  • [3] Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine in locally advanced biliary tract cancer
    Yi, Seung Woo
    Kang, Dae Ryong
    Kim, Kyung Sik
    Park, Mi Suk
    Seong, Jinsil
    Park, Jeong Youp
    Bang, Seung Min
    Song, Si Young
    Chung, Jae Bock
    Park, Seung Woo
    CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 2014, 73 (01) : 191 - 198
  • [4] Efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy with 5-fluorouracil or gemcitabine in locally advanced biliary tract cancer
    Seung Woo Yi
    Dae Ryong Kang
    Kyung Sik Kim
    Mi Suk Park
    Jinsil Seong
    Jeong Youp Park
    Seung Min Bang
    Si Young Song
    Jae Bock Chung
    Seung Woo Park
    Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology, 2014, 73 : 191 - 198
  • [5] Gemcitabine chemotherapy versus 5-fluorouracil-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced unresectable pancreatic cancer
    Park, Joo Kyung
    Ryu, Ji Kon
    Lee, Jun Kyu
    Yoon, Won Jae
    Lee, Sang Hyub
    Kim, Yong-Tae
    Yoon, Yong Bum
    PANCREAS, 2006, 33 (04) : 397 - 402
  • [6] A prospective randomized study of gemcitabine with doxifluridine versus paclitaxel with doxifluridine in concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Chung, HW
    Bang, SM
    Park, SW
    Chung, JB
    Kang, JK
    Kim, JW
    Seong, JS
    Lee, WJ
    Song, SY
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2004, 60 (05): : 1494 - 1501
  • [7] Phase II study of induction chemotherapy with gemcitabine plus 5-fluorouracil followed by gemcitabine-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy for unresectable locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Kurt, Ender
    Kurt, Meral
    Kanat, Ozkan
    Cetintas, Sibel Kahraman
    Aygun, Sevilcan
    Palazoglu, Julay
    Ozkan, Lutfi
    Evrensel, Turkkan
    Kaya, Ekrem
    Manavoglu, Osman
    TUMORI, 2006, 92 (06) : 481 - 486
  • [8] Comparison of capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil in chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Yeon-Joo Kim
    Woo Jin Lee
    Sang Myung Woo
    Tae Hyun Kim
    Sung Sik Han
    Bo Hyun Kim
    Sung Ho Moon
    Sang Soo Kim
    Young Hwan Koh
    Sang Jae Park
    Joo Young Kim
    Dae Yong Kim
    Joong Won Park
    Radiation Oncology, 8
  • [9] Comparison of capecitabine and 5-fluorouracil in chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer
    Kim, Yeon-Joo
    Lee, Woo Jin
    Woo, Sang Myung
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    Han, Sung-Sik
    Kim, Bo Hyun
    Moon, Sung Ho
    Kim, Sang Soo
    Koh, Young Hwan
    Park, Sang-Jae
    Kim, Joo-Young
    Kim, Dae Yong
    Park, Joong-Won
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2013, 8
  • [10] Gemcitabine/cisplatin versus 5-fluorouracil/mitomycin C chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced pancreatic cancer: a retrospective analysis of 93 patients
    Brunner, Thomas B.
    Sauer, Rolf
    Fietkau, Rainer
    RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2011, 6