Safe and effective sedation and analgesia for bone marrow aspiration procedures in children with alfentanil, remifentanil and combinations with midazolam

被引:31
作者
Antmen, B
Sasmaz, I [1 ]
Birbiçer, H
Özbek, H
Burgut, R
Isik, G
Kilinç, Y
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat Hematol, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey
[2] Mersin Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Mersin, Turkey
[3] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Div Algol, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey
[4] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey
关键词
remifentanil; alfentanil; midazolam; bone marrow aspiration;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01411.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Invasive procedures such as bone marrow aspiration in children may be painful and cause anxiety. We investigated the efficacy and safety of remifentanil (R) alfentanil (A), remifentanil-midazolam (RM), and alfentanil-midazolam (AM) combinations in providing analgesia and sedation for bone marrow aspiration. Methods: Eighty children undergoing a diagnostic bone marrow aspiration whose ages ranged from 5-16 years (mean 9.20 +/- 3.00 years) were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to one of 4 treatment groups. Vital signs, sedation and pain scores, somatic responses (sweating and tears) were recorded before, during bone marrow aspiration and after 5 and 15 min of the procedure. Results: There were no statistical differences between sedation and the CHEOPS scores of the four groups during and after the procedures. The VAS scores were significantly higher for group A compared with groups R and RM during the procedure (P < 0.008). There were no differences between the VAS scores in group AM compared with groups R and RM (P > 0.008). There were also no statistical differences among the VAS scores of four groups after the procedure (P > 0.008). All patients had adequate sedation and analgesia. None of the patients in the study had deep sedation, hypotension, bradycardia, hypoxemia, or respiratory depression. Conclusions: Remifentanil, alfentanil, remifentanil-midazolam, and alfentanil-midazolam combinations are effective in children and can be used safely in bone marrow aspiration which is a brief but painful procedure performed in the pediatric patient group.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 219
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
  • [1] ANDERSON CTM, 1993, PAIN INFANTS CHILDRE, P435
  • [2] Interactions between midazolam and remifentanil during monitored anesthesia care
    Avramov, MN
    Smith, I
    White, PF
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (06) : 1283 - 1289
  • [3] Bailey P.L., 1994, BASICS ANESTHESIA, V291
  • [4] FREQUENT HYPOXEMIA AND APNEA AFTER SEDATION WITH MIDAZOLAM AND FENTANYL
    BAILEY, PL
    PACE, NL
    ASHBURN, MA
    MOLL, JWB
    EAST, KA
    STANLEY, TH
    [J]. ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 73 (05) : 826 - 830
  • [5] A randomized multicenter study of remifentanil compared with alfentanil, isoflurane, or propofol in anesthetized pediatric patients undergoing elective strabismus surgery
    Davis, PJ
    Lerman, J
    Suresh, S
    McGowan, FX
    Cote, CJ
    Landsman, I
    Henson, LG
    [J]. ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (05) : 982 - 989
  • [6] Use of remifentanil in infants
    Eck, JB
    Lynn, AM
    [J]. PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 8 (05): : 437 - 439
  • [7] Remifentanil infusion for cardiac catheterization in children with congenital heart disease
    Foubert, L
    Reyntjens, K
    De Wolf, D
    Suys, B
    Moerman, A
    Mortier, E
    [J]. ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 46 (04) : 355 - 360
  • [8] Friedman L.M., 1996, FUNDAMENTALS CLIN TR, V3rd
  • [9] GREELEY WJ, 1997, PEDIAT ANESTHESIA
  • [10] Intravenous anesthesia with propofol for painful procedures in children with cancer
    Jayabose, S
    Levendoglu-Tugal, O
    Giamelli, J
    Grodin, W
    Cohn, M
    Sandoval, C
    Ozkaynak, F
    Kubal, K
    Nosetti, M
    Uman, J
    Visintainer, P
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2001, 23 (05) : 290 - 293