Safe and effective sedation and analgesia for bone marrow aspiration procedures in children with alfentanil, remifentanil and combinations with midazolam

被引:31
作者
Antmen, B
Sasmaz, I [1 ]
Birbiçer, H
Özbek, H
Burgut, R
Isik, G
Kilinç, Y
机构
[1] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pediat Hematol, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey
[2] Mersin Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Mersin, Turkey
[3] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Anesthesiol & Reanimat, Div Algol, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey
[4] Cukurova Univ, Fac Med, Dept Biostat, TR-01330 Adana, Turkey
关键词
remifentanil; alfentanil; midazolam; bone marrow aspiration;
D O I
10.1111/j.1460-9592.2004.01411.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Invasive procedures such as bone marrow aspiration in children may be painful and cause anxiety. We investigated the efficacy and safety of remifentanil (R) alfentanil (A), remifentanil-midazolam (RM), and alfentanil-midazolam (AM) combinations in providing analgesia and sedation for bone marrow aspiration. Methods: Eighty children undergoing a diagnostic bone marrow aspiration whose ages ranged from 5-16 years (mean 9.20 +/- 3.00 years) were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to one of 4 treatment groups. Vital signs, sedation and pain scores, somatic responses (sweating and tears) were recorded before, during bone marrow aspiration and after 5 and 15 min of the procedure. Results: There were no statistical differences between sedation and the CHEOPS scores of the four groups during and after the procedures. The VAS scores were significantly higher for group A compared with groups R and RM during the procedure (P < 0.008). There were no differences between the VAS scores in group AM compared with groups R and RM (P > 0.008). There were also no statistical differences among the VAS scores of four groups after the procedure (P > 0.008). All patients had adequate sedation and analgesia. None of the patients in the study had deep sedation, hypotension, bradycardia, hypoxemia, or respiratory depression. Conclusions: Remifentanil, alfentanil, remifentanil-midazolam, and alfentanil-midazolam combinations are effective in children and can be used safely in bone marrow aspiration which is a brief but painful procedure performed in the pediatric patient group.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 219
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
ANDERSON CTM, 1993, PAIN INFANTS CHILDRE, P435
[2]   Interactions between midazolam and remifentanil during monitored anesthesia care [J].
Avramov, MN ;
Smith, I ;
White, PF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 85 (06) :1283-1289
[3]  
Bailey P.L., 1994, BASICS ANESTHESIA, V291
[4]   FREQUENT HYPOXEMIA AND APNEA AFTER SEDATION WITH MIDAZOLAM AND FENTANYL [J].
BAILEY, PL ;
PACE, NL ;
ASHBURN, MA ;
MOLL, JWB ;
EAST, KA ;
STANLEY, TH .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1990, 73 (05) :826-830
[5]   A randomized multicenter study of remifentanil compared with alfentanil, isoflurane, or propofol in anesthetized pediatric patients undergoing elective strabismus surgery [J].
Davis, PJ ;
Lerman, J ;
Suresh, S ;
McGowan, FX ;
Cote, CJ ;
Landsman, I ;
Henson, LG .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (05) :982-989
[6]   Use of remifentanil in infants [J].
Eck, JB ;
Lynn, AM .
PAEDIATRIC ANAESTHESIA, 1998, 8 (05) :437-439
[7]   Remifentanil infusion for cardiac catheterization in children with congenital heart disease [J].
Foubert, L ;
Reyntjens, K ;
De Wolf, D ;
Suys, B ;
Moerman, A ;
Mortier, E .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2002, 46 (04) :355-360
[8]  
Friedman L.M., 1996, FUNDAMENTALS CLIN TR, V3rd
[9]  
GREELEY WJ, 1997, PEDIAT ANESTHESIA
[10]   Intravenous anesthesia with propofol for painful procedures in children with cancer [J].
Jayabose, S ;
Levendoglu-Tugal, O ;
Giamelli, J ;
Grodin, W ;
Cohn, M ;
Sandoval, C ;
Ozkaynak, F ;
Kubal, K ;
Nosetti, M ;
Uman, J ;
Visintainer, P .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY, 2001, 23 (05) :290-293