Assessment of spasticity: an overview of systematic reviews

被引:5
作者
Aloraini, Saleh M. [1 ]
Alyosuf, Emtenan Y. [1 ]
Aloraini, Lamya I. [1 ]
Aldaihan, Mishal M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Qassim Univ, Coll Med Rehabil, Dept Phys Therapy, Buraydah 51452, Saudi Arabia
[2] King Saud Univ, Coll Appl Med Sci, Dept Rehabil Sci, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
关键词
Systematic reviews; spasticity; assessment; CEREBRAL-PALSY; ASHWORTH SCALE; TARDIEU SCALE; CONTRACTURE; CHILDREN; REFLEX;
D O I
10.1080/10833196.2022.2059942
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Background: Spasticity is a common impairment following an upper motor neuron lesion. A number of definitions were proposed for spasticity, as it is a complex phenomenon that is difficult to assess. It is important to address the measurement of spasticity and improve clinical practices related to assessing spasticity. There are numerous systematic reviews related to spasticity assessment varying in their quality, framework and methodology. Objective: We aimed to systematically evaluate the evidence from published systematic reviews related to assessment of spasticity in people with various neurological conditions. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was conducted in the following databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Embase and The Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers screened the literature search results to include relevant studies. Subsequently, reviewers extracted the data using a standardized form. The quality of studies was assessed using Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR), and the quality of evidence was critically appraised with Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Results:Following the literature search and screening process, a total of 19 studies were included in this overview of systematic reviews. Within these 19 studies, 60 different spasticity assessment tools were found. There were 33 clinical measures of spasticity, 18 biomechanical measures and 8 neurophysiological measures. The majority of systematic reviews were found to have low to moderate rating on AMSTAR and the level of evidence (GRADE) was generally found to be low. Conclusion: Overall, our findings suggest that, despite the decades of research, spasticity assessment still requires further investigation. The majority of evidence related to spasticity assessment is low, with the majority of studies relying on methods that assess resistance to passive movement rather than spasticity. Future research is greatly warranted to elucidate the proper approaches for assessing spasticity.
引用
收藏
页码:290 / 303
页数:14
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   Assessment of spasticity after stroke using clinical measures: a systematic review [J].
Aloraini, Saleh M. ;
Gaverth, Johan ;
Yeung, Ellen ;
MacKay-Lyons, Marilyn .
DISABILITY AND REHABILITATION, 2015, 37 (25) :2313-2323
[2]   Assessments and Interventions for Spasticity in Infants With or at High Risk for Cerebral Palsy: A Systematic Review [J].
Ayala, Lauren ;
Winter, Sarah ;
Byrne, Rachel ;
Fehlings, Darcy ;
Gehred, Alison ;
Letzkus, Lisa ;
Noritz, Garey ;
Paton, Madison C. B. ;
Pietruszewski, Lindsay ;
Rosenberg, Nathan ;
Tanner, Kelly ;
Vargus-Adams, Jilda ;
Novak, Iona ;
Maitre, Nathalie L. .
PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY, 2021, 118 :72-90
[3]   Do clinical tests of spasticity accurately reflect muscle function during walking: A systematic review [J].
Banky, Megan ;
Ryan, Hannah K. ;
Clark, Ross ;
Olver, John ;
Williams, Gavin .
BRAIN INJURY, 2017, 31 (04) :440-455
[4]   Manually controlled instrumented spasticity assessments: a systematic review of psychometric properties [J].
Bar-On, Lynn ;
Aertbelien, Erwin ;
Molenaers, Guy ;
Dan, Bernard ;
Desloovere, Kaat .
DEVELOPMENTAL MEDICINE AND CHILD NEUROLOGY, 2014, 56 (10) :932-950
[5]  
BOTTE MJ, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P7
[6]   Tonic Stretch Reflex Threshold as a Measure of Spasticity: Implications for Clinical Practice [J].
Calota, Andra ;
Levin, Mindy F. .
TOPICS IN STROKE REHABILITATION, 2009, 16 (03) :177-188
[7]   Quantitative Modeling of Spasticity for Clinical Assessment, Treatment and Rehabilitation [J].
Cha, Yesung ;
Arami, Arash .
SENSORS, 2020, 20 (18) :1-22
[8]   Defining spasticity: a new approach considering current movement disorders terminology and botulinum toxin therapy [J].
Dressler, Dirk ;
Bhidayasiri, Roongroj ;
Bohlega, Saeed ;
Chana, Pedro ;
Chien, Hsin Fen ;
Chung, Tae Mo ;
Colosimo, Carlo ;
Ebke, Markus ;
Fedoroff, Klemens ;
Frank, Bernd ;
Kaji, Ryuji ;
Kanovsky, Petr ;
Kocer, Serdar ;
Micheli, Federico ;
Orlova, Olga ;
Paus, Sebastian ;
Pirtosek, Zvezdan ;
Relja, Maja ;
Rosales, Raymond L. ;
Alberto Sagastegui-Rodriguez, Jose ;
Schoenle, Paul W. ;
Shahidi, Gholam Ali ;
Timerbaeva, Sofia ;
Walter, Uwe ;
Saberi, Fereshte Adib .
JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY, 2018, 265 (04) :856-862
[9]   A review and evaluation of patient-reported outcome measures for spasticity in persons with spinal cord damage: Recommendations from the Ability Network - an international initiative [J].
Ertzgaard, Per ;
Nene, Anand ;
Kiekens, Carlotte ;
Burns, Anthony S. .
JOURNAL OF SPINAL CORD MEDICINE, 2020, 43 (06) :813-823
[10]   PSYCHOMETRIC EVIDENCE OF SPASTICITY MEASUREMENT TOOLS IN CEREBRAL PALSY CHILDREN AND ADOLESCENTS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW [J].
Flamand, Veronique H. ;
Masse-Alarie, Hugo ;
Schneider, Cyril .
JOURNAL OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, 2013, 45 (01) :14-23