"Smart inhibition": electrophysiological evidence for the suppression of conflict-generating task rules during task switching

被引:13
作者
Meiran, Nachshon [1 ,2 ]
Hsieh, Shulan [3 ]
Chang, Chi-Chih [4 ]
机构
[1] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Dept Psychol, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[2] Ben Gurion Univ Negev, Zlotowsky Ctr Neurosci, IL-84105 Beer Sheva, Israel
[3] Natl Cheng Kung Univ, Tainan 70101, Taiwan
[4] Natl Chung Cheng Univ, Chiayi, Taiwan
关键词
Event-related potentials; Reaction time; Task switching; Cognitive control; Inhibition; Conflict monitoring; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; ERROR-RELATED NEGATIVITY; LONG-TERM-MEMORY; COGNITIVE CONTROL; SET RECONFIGURATION; CONTROL MECHANISMS; RESPONSE CONFLICT; CUEING PROCEDURE; COMPONENTS; SELECTION;
D O I
10.3758/s13415-011-0037-y
中图分类号
B84 [心理学]; C [社会科学总论]; Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ; 030303 ; 04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
A major challenge for task switching is maintaining a balance between high task readiness and effectively ignoring irrelevant task rules. This calls for finely tuned inhibition that targets only the source of interference without adversely influencing other task-related representations. The authors show that irrelevant task rules generating response conflict are inhibited, causing their inefficient execution on the next trial (indicating the presence of competitor rule suppression[CRS];Meiran, Hsieh, & Dimov, Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 36, 992-1002, 2010). To determine whether CRS influences task rules, rather than target stimuli or responses, the authors focused on the processing of the task cue before the target stimulus was presented and before the response could be chosen. As was predicted, CRS was found in the event-related potentials in two time windows during task cue processing. It was also found in three time windows after target presentation. Source localization analyses suggest the involvement of the right dorsal prefrontal cortex in all five time windows.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 308
页数:17
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
ALLPORT A, 1994, ATTENTION PERFORM, V15, P421
[2]   Fractionating the cognitive control required to bring about a change in task: A dense-sensor event-related potential study [J].
Astle, Duncan E. ;
Jackson, G. M. ;
Swainson, R. .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 20 (02) :255-267
[3]   Think differently:: a brain orienting response to task novelty [J].
Barceló, F ;
Periáñez, JA ;
Knight, RT .
NEUROREPORT, 2002, 13 (15) :1887-1892
[4]   Strategic control and medial frontal negativity: Beyond errors and response conflict [J].
Bartholow, BD ;
Pearson, MA ;
Dickter, CL ;
Sher, KJ ;
Fabiani, M ;
Gratton, G .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 42 (01) :33-42
[5]   Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].
Botvinick, MM ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652
[6]   A computational model of fractionated conflict-control mechanisms in task-switching [J].
Brown, Joshua W. ;
Reynolds, Jeremy R. ;
Braver, Todd S. .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 2007, 55 (01) :37-85
[7]   Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information [J].
Egner, T ;
Hirsch, J .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2005, 8 (12) :1784-1790
[8]   Electrophysiological correlates of crossmodal visual distractor congruency effects: Evidence for response conflict [J].
Forster, Bettina ;
Pavone, Enea F. .
COGNITIVE AFFECTIVE & BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 2008, 8 (01) :65-73
[9]   Methodological and empirical issues when dissociating cue-related from task-related processes in the explicit task-cuing procedure [J].
Forstmann, Birte U. ;
Brass, Marcel ;
Koch, Iring .
PSYCHOLOGICAL RESEARCH-PSYCHOLOGISCHE FORSCHUNG, 2007, 71 (04) :393-400
[10]   The role of the dopamine transporter DAT1 genotype on the neural correlates of cognitive flexibility [J].
Garcia-Garcia, M. ;
Barcelo, F. ;
Clemente, I. C. ;
Escera, C. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2010, 31 (04) :754-760