Fair value measurement and its impact on audit fees: evidence in the Brazilian market

被引:1
|
作者
Bastos, Edson Vinicius Pontes [1 ]
Holtz, Luciana [2 ]
dos Santos, Odilanei Morais [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Fed Rio De Janeiro, COPPE UFRJ Inst Alberto Luiz Coimbra Posgrad & Pe, Av Pasteur,250 Urca, BR-22290240 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Juiz De Fora, Av Pasteur,250 Urca, BR-22290240 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Univ Fed Rio De Janeiro, Accounting Sci, Av Pasteur,250 Urca, BR-22290240 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
来源
REVISTA AMBIENTE CONTABIL | 2021年 / 13卷 / 02期
关键词
Fair value; Audit fees; Monitoring costs; CORPORATE GOVERNANCE; COST; RISK;
D O I
10.21680/2176-9036.2021v13n2ID25719
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Objective: The purpose is to verify the impact of using the measurement at fair value on the audit fees, differentiating even the period before and after the adoption of IFRS 13 (CPC 46). Methodology: The research is quantitative, for testing the hypothesis raised, the multiple regression technique was used, with data available from companies listed in B3 for the period between 2010 and 2016. Results: The evidence indicates that the complexity and subjectivity of fair value is recognized by the audit firms, that is, audit firms recognize that fair value measurement implies more effort and that the associated audit risk rises, leading firms to charge of a risk premium for the provision of the service. However, it was not possible to confirm that auditors' fees increased after the adoption of IFRS13 (CPC 46). Contributions of study: Theoretical/methodological - The study contributes to understanding the impacts of adopting international accounting standards, in this specific case on audit fees. Social/management - Given the evidence that there is a higher audit cost associated with the greater complexity of information in a fair value environment, companies can develop mechanisms to minimize the uncertainty of the information to be audited.
引用
收藏
页码:80 / 99
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Opinion - Further Evidence from China's Capital Market
    Xie, Zanchun
    Cai, Chun
    Ye, Jianming
    CHINA JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING RESEARCH, 2010, 3 : 51 - 70
  • [42] The Effect of Mandatory Audit Firm Rotation on Audit Quality and Audit Fees: Empirical Evidence from the Korean Audit Market
    Kwon, Soo Young
    Lim, Youngdeok
    Simnett, Roger
    AUDITING-A JOURNAL OF PRACTICE & THEORY, 2014, 33 (04): : 167 - 195
  • [43] The Impact of Mandatory IFRS Adoption on Audit Fees: Theory and Evidence
    Kim, Jeong-Bon
    Liu, Xiaohong
    Zheng, Liu
    ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2012, 87 (06): : 2061 - 2094
  • [44] Evidence on the Impact of Internal Control and Corporate Governance on Audit Fees
    Hay, David
    Knechel, W. Robert
    Ling, Helen
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUDITING, 2008, 12 (01) : 9 - 24
  • [45] Study of Audit Risk under the Fair Value Measurement Mode
    Li, Yong-chen
    Liu, Yuan-yuan
    Liu, Zhi-yuan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 3D INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON APPLIED SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH, 2016, 105 : 440 - 442
  • [46] The impact of COVID-19 lockdown on audit fees and audit delay: international evidence
    Harjoto, Maretno A.
    Laksmana, Indrarini
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2022, 30 (04) : 526 - 545
  • [47] The impact of PCAOB international registration on audit quality and audit fees: Evidence from China
    Mohapatra, Partha S.
    Elkins, Hamilton
    Lobo, Gerald J.
    Chi, Wuchun
    JOURNAL OF ACCOUNTING AND PUBLIC POLICY, 2022, 41 (04)
  • [48] The Impact of Mandatory IFRS Transition on Audit Effort and Audit Fees: Evidence from Korea
    Nam, Hye-Jeong
    AUSTRALIAN ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2018, 28 (04) : 512 - 524
  • [49] Product market competition and audit fees: evidence from the Chinese manufacturing industry
    Zhang, Zhenbo
    Zhang, Yuxuan
    Yan, Mengfan
    PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2023, 35 (02) : 292 - 313
  • [50] A Study on Audit Fees Decision Making: Evidence from China Stock Market
    Li, Xin
    Zhu, Xiaobo
    2011 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INDUSTRIAL ENGINEERING AND ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT (IEEM), 2011, : 1775 - 1779