How do firms innovate with limited resources in turbulent markets?

被引:20
作者
Bicen, Pelin [1 ]
Johnson, William H. A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, Black Sch Business, Erie, PA 16563 USA
来源
INNOVATION-ORGANIZATION & MANAGEMENT | 2014年 / 16卷 / 03期
关键词
radical innovation; resource limitations; slack resources; bricolage; comparative cases; lean innovation capability; resource-advantage theory; SLACK RESOURCES; OPPORTUNITIES; EXPLORATION; EVOLUTION; ADOPTION; GROWTH; VIEW;
D O I
10.1080/14479338.2014.11081998
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Th is study explores the question of how firms innovate with limited resources in turbulent markets utilizing the comparative case studies of 10 start-up companies. The evidence discovered while studying resource-limited innovation at these 10 companies suggests that the effect resource utilization has on innovation performance is moderated by four attitudinal factors that act as catalysts for successful innovation when resources are limited. The four factors are: Intention, Inspiration, Integration, and Indefatigability. These factors are the foundation of lean innovation capability' such that companies, in the presence of these attitudinal factors, use limited resources in creative ways. The study's results suggesta need to reconsider the conventional wisdom regarding the need for the abundance of resources in order to successfully innovate. In fact, utilizing the case data, we argue that limited resources managed with these four-attitudinal factors lead to superior innovation performance, which is underutilized and ineffi ciently deployed in more munifi cent environments.
引用
收藏
页码:430 / 444
页数:15
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]   Assessing the work environment for creativity [J].
Amabile, TM ;
Conti, R ;
Coon, H ;
Lazenby, J ;
Herron, M .
ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 1996, 39 (05) :1154-1184
[2]  
Anderson C., 2010, Free how today's smartest businesses profit by giving something for nothing
[3]   Exploitation-Exploration Tensions and Organizational Ambidexterity: Managing Paradoxes of Innovation [J].
Andriopoulos, Constantine ;
Lewis, Marianne W. .
ORGANIZATION SCIENCE, 2009, 20 (04) :696-717
[4]  
[Anonymous], AM ENERGY INNOVATION
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, SCI TECHNOLOGY INT P
[6]  
[Anonymous], 4 STEPS EPIPHAMY SUC
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Thinking, fast and slow
[8]  
[Anonymous], NEW VENTURE CREATION
[9]  
[Anonymous], VENTURE CAPITAL SECR
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1996, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A