Fixed-Route vs. Demand-Responsive Transport Feeder Services: An Exploratory Study Using an Agent-Based Model

被引:21
作者
Calabro, Giovanni [1 ]
Le Pira, Michela [1 ]
Giuffrida, Nadia [2 ]
Inturri, Giuseppe [3 ]
Ignaccolo, Matteo [1 ]
Correia, Goncalo H. de A. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Catania, Dept Civil Engn & Architecture, I-95123 Catania, Italy
[2] Univ Coll Dublin, Sch Architecture Planning & Environm Policy, Univ Coll Richview Campus, Dublin D04 V1W8, Ireland
[3] Univ Catania, Dept Elect Elect & Comp Engn, I-95123 Catania, Italy
[4] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Transport & Planning, Stevinweg 1, NL-2628 CN Delft, Netherlands
关键词
All Open Access; Gold; Green;
D O I
10.1155/2022/8382754
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Feeder transport services are fundamental as first and last-mile connectors of mass rapid transit (MRT) They are especially beneficial in low-demand areas where private transport is usually the main transport mode. Besides, the rapid spread of new technologies such as vehicle automation and the shared mobility paradigm gave rise to new mobility-on-demand modes that can dynamically match demand with service supply. In this context, the new generation of real-time demand-responsive transport services can act as on-demand feeders of MRT, but their performance needs to be compared with conventional fixed-route fixedschedule feeders.)is article aims at presenting an agent-based model able to simulate different feeder services and explore the conditions that make a demand-responsive feeder (DRF) service more or less attractive than a fixed-route fixed-schedule feeder (FRF).)e parametric simulation environment creates realistic constraints and parameters that are usually not included in analytical models because of high computational complexity. First, we identified the critical demand density representing a switching point between the two services. Once the demand density is fixed, exploratory scenarios are tested by changing the demand spatial distribution and patterns, service area, and service configurations. Main results suggest that the DRF is to be preferred when the demand is spatially concentrated close to the MRTstation (e.g., in a TOD-like land-use area) or when station spacing is quite high (e.g., a regional railway service), whereas the FRF performs better when the demand is mainly originated at the MRTstation to any other destinations in the service area (e.g., during peak hours). Besides, automated vehicles could play a role in reducing the operator cost if the service is performed with many small vehicles rather than higher-capacity vehicles, even if this would not imply a major benefit gain for the users.
引用
收藏
页数:20
相关论文
共 49 条
  • [1] Ambrosino G., 2016, P 21 INT C URB PLANN, P737
  • [2] On the Importance of demand Consolidation in Mobility on Demand
    Araldo, Andrea
    Di Maria, Andrea
    Di Stefano, Antonella
    Morana, Giovanni
    [J]. 2019 IEEE/ACM 23RD INTERNATIONAL SYMPOSIUM ON DISTRIBUTED SIMULATION AND REAL TIME APPLICATIONS (DS-RT), 2019, : 51 - 58
  • [3] Bisaschi L., 2021, Research for TRAN Committee - Transport Infrastructure in Low-density and Depopulating Areas
  • [4] Bischoff J, 2017, IEEE INT C INTELL TR
  • [5] Brake J., 2004, J TRANSP GEOGR, V12, P323
  • [6] Designing robust routes for demand-responsive transport systems
    Bruni, M. E.
    Guerriero, F.
    Beraldi, P.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART E-LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORTATION REVIEW, 2014, 70 : 1 - 16
  • [7] Calabro G., 2020, 2020 Forum on Integrated and Sustainable Transportation Systems (FISTS), P280, DOI 10.1109/FISTS46898.2020.9264861
  • [8] Calabro G., 2019, Transportation Research Procedia, V45, P234, DOI [10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.012, DOI 10.1016/J.TRPRO.2020.03.012, 10.1016/j.procs.2020.03.164, DOI 10.1016/J.PROCS.2020.03.164]
  • [9] A model for estimating the optimal cycle length of demand responsive feeder transit services
    Chandra, Shailesh
    Quadrifoglio, Luca
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART B-METHODOLOGICAL, 2013, 51 : 1 - 16
  • [10] Modeling Demand Responsive Transport using SARL and MATSim
    Cich, Glenn
    Knapen, Luk
    Maciejewski, Michal
    Yasar, Ansar-Ul-Haque
    Bellemans, Tom
    Janssens, Davy
    [J]. 8TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON AMBIENT SYSTEMS, NETWORKS AND TECHNOLOGIES (ANT-2017) AND THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (SEIT 2017), 2017, 109 : 1074 - 1079