The role of Theory of Mind in assessing cooperative intentions

被引:26
作者
Sylwester, Karolina [1 ]
Lyons, Minna [2 ]
Buchanan, Claire [3 ]
Nettle, Daniel [1 ]
Roberts, Gilbert [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, Ctr Behav & Evolut, Inst Neurosci, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE2 4HH, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Liverpool Hope Univ, Dept Psychol, Liverpool L16 9JD, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Sch Biol Sci, Liverpool L69 7ZB, Merseyside, England
关键词
Cooperation; Cheater detection; Theory of Mind; Facial expression; THEORY-OF-MIND; DECEPTION; CUES;
D O I
10.1016/j.paid.2011.09.005
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Folk wisdom indicates that people vary in the extent to which they can assess others' cooperative intentions. In two studies we investigated whether Theory of Mind (TOM), the ability to represent mental states of others, is related to accuracy in the recognition of cooperativeness. Participants completed a ToM task and were asked to assess either video clips of people playing a variation of a Prisoner's Dilemma (PD) game (Study 1, N = 88), or photographs of people playing PD taken at the very moment when they were expressing a decision to cooperate or to defect (Study 2, N = 99). We found relationships between ToM and cooperative intention recognition only in Study 1, when participants were exposed to long versions of the video clips. In contrast to previous reports, participants in our samples did not score higher than chance in cooperativeness assessment except for Study 1 in the condition with short video clips. Our results question human expertise at identifying defectors and cooperators and do not provide clear support for an association between ToM and cooperativeness assessment. The findings are discussed from the perspective of an evolutionary arms race between interpreting and masking cooperative intentions. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:113 / 117
页数:5
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1992, ADAPTED MIND
[2]   Very first impressions [J].
Bar, Moshe ;
Neta, Maital ;
Linz, Heather .
EMOTION, 2006, 6 (02) :269-278
[3]  
Baron-Cohen S, 2001, J CHILD PSYCHOL PSYC, V42, P241, DOI 10.1017/S0021963001006643
[4]   Accuracy of deception judgments [J].
Bond, Charles F., Jr. ;
DePaulo, Bella M. .
PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2006, 10 (03) :214-234
[5]   Emotional expressivity and trustworthiness: The role of nonverbal behavior in the evolution of cooperation [J].
Boone, RT ;
Buck, R .
JOURNAL OF NONVERBAL BEHAVIOR, 2003, 27 (03) :163-182
[6]  
Brown W.M., 2003, EVOL PSYCHOL-US, V1, P42, DOI [DOI 10.1177/147470490300100104, 10.1177/147470490300100104]
[7]   RETRACTED: Dance reveals symmetry especially in young men (Retracted article. See vol. 504, pg. 470, 2013) [J].
Brown, WM ;
Cronk, L ;
Grochow, K ;
Jacobson, A ;
Liu, CK ;
Popovic, Z ;
Trivers, R .
NATURE, 2005, 438 (7071) :1148-1150
[8]   ARMS RACES BETWEEN AND WITHIN SPECIES [J].
DAWKINS, R ;
KREBS, JR .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1979, 205 (1161) :489-511
[9]  
Dunbar R., 1996, Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language
[10]   The social brain: Mind, language, and society in evolutionary perspective [J].
Dunbar, RIM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF ANTHROPOLOGY, 2003, 32 :163-181