Testing and exploring the predictors of faculty motivation to use learning analytics to enhance teaching effectiveness

被引:3
作者
Amida, Ademola [1 ]
Herbert, Michael J. [2 ]
Omojiba, Makinde [3 ]
Stupnisky, Robert [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ North Dakota, Teaching & Leadership, Grand Forks, ND 58202 USA
[2] Univ North Dakota, Higher Educ, Grand Forks, ND USA
[3] Univ North Dakota, Educ Fdn & Res, Grand Forks, ND USA
关键词
Faculty; Learning analytics; Motivation; Self-determination; Expectancy-value; Teaching effectiveness; SELF-DETERMINATION THEORY; DECISIONS; AUTONOMY; SUCCESS; ADOPT; MODEL; SIZE;
D O I
10.1007/s12528-022-09309-2
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The purpose of this mixed-methods study was to explore factors affecting faculty members' motivation to use learning analytics (LA) to improve their teaching. In the quantitative phase, 107 faculty members completed an online survey about their motivation to use LA. The results showed that cost, utility, attainment value, and competence all predicted intrinsic motivation to use LA; then, in turn, positive introjected motivation and amotivation predicted faculty LA usage. In the qualitative phase, ten faculty participated in three focus groups, and seven themes emerged as key factors that affected their motivation to use LA. The themes involving motivating factors included tracking and monitoring learning activities, early alert, improve teaching effectiveness, institutional training, and support. Alternatively, demotivating factors included the cost in terms of time, lack of data competence, and the 'un-structuredness' of the dataset. The paper also discussed the mechanisms for increasing LA usage among faculty members to improve their teaching.
引用
收藏
页码:545 / 576
页数:32
相关论文
共 67 条
[1]   Investigating faculty decisions to adopt Web 2.0 technologies: Theory and empirical tests [J].
Ajjan, Haya ;
Hartshorne, Richard .
INTERNET AND HIGHER EDUCATION, 2008, 11 (02) :71-80
[2]   Factors influencing beliefs for adoption of a learning analytics tool: An empirical study [J].
Ali, Liaqat ;
Asadi, Mohsen ;
Gasevic, Dragan ;
Jovanovic, Jelena ;
Hatala, Marek .
COMPUTERS & EDUCATION, 2013, 62 :130-148
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2021, WHAT IS LEARN AN
[4]  
Arnold K.E., 2012, P 2 INT C LEARNING A, P267, DOI 10.1145/2330601.2330666
[5]  
Arroway P., 2016, Research report
[6]   A Conceptual Framework linking Learning Design with Learning Analytics [J].
Bakharia, Aneesha ;
Corrin, Linda ;
de Barba, Paula ;
Kennedy, Gregor ;
Gasevic, Dragan ;
Mulder, Raoul ;
Williams, David ;
Dawson, Shane ;
Lockyer, Lori .
LAK '16 CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS: THE SIXTH INTERNATIONAL LEARNING ANALYTICS & KNOWLEDGE CONFERENCE,, 2016, :329-338
[7]  
Banihashem S. K., 2018, Interdisciplinary Journal of Virtual Learning in Medical Sciences, V9, DOI [10.5812/ijvlms.63024, DOI 10.5812/IJVLMS.63024]
[8]  
Bollenback D., 2018, Issues in Information Systems, V19, P71
[9]  
BrckaLorenz A., 2012, To Improve the Academy, V31, P148, DOI [10.1002/j.2334-4822.2012.tb00679.x, DOI 10.1002/J.2334-4822.2012.TB00679.X]
[10]   Factors affecting faculty use of learning technologies: implications for models of technology adoption [J].
Buchanan, Tom ;
Sainter, Phillip ;
Saunders, Gunter .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTING IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2013, 25 (01) :1-11