Magnetic Resonance Imaging Phenotypes of Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: A Systematic Review

被引:37
作者
Ab Mumin, Nazimah [1 ,2 ]
Hamid, Marlina Tanty Ramli [2 ]
Wong, Jeannie Hsiu Ding [1 ]
Rahmat, Kartini [1 ]
Ng, Kwan Hoong [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Malaya, Fac Med, Dept Biomed Imaging, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
[2] Univ Teknol MARA, Fac Med, Dept Radiol, Sungai Buloh, Selangor, Malaysia
关键词
Invasive breast cancer; Molecular subtypes; Magnetic resonance imaging; Dynamic contrast-enhanced; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; BACKGROUND PARENCHYMAL ENHANCEMENT; ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR; PROGNOSTIC-FACTORS; MRI; FEATURES; EXPRESSION; THERAPY; CLASSIFICATION; HETEROGENEITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.acra.2021.07.017
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Objective: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the most sensitive imaging modality in detecting breast cancer. The purpose of this systematic review is to investigate the role of human extracted MRI phenotypes in classifying molecular subtypes of breast cancer. Methods: We performed a literature search of published articles on the application of MRI phenotypic features in invasive breast cancer molecular subtype classifications by radiologists' interpretation on Medline Complete, Pubmed, and Google scholar from 1st January 2000 to 31st March 2021. Of the 1453 literature identified, 42 fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Results: All studies were case-controlled, retrospective study and research-based. The majority of the studies assessed the MRI features using American College of Radiology- Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (ACR-BIRADS) classification and using dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) kinetic features, Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) values, and T2 sequence. Most studies divided invasive breast cancer into 4 main subtypes, luminal A, luminal B, HER2, and triple-negative (TN) cancers, and used 2 readers. We present a summary of the radiologists' extracted breast MRI phenotypical features and their correlating breast cancer subtypes classifications. The characteristic features are morphology, enhancement kinetics, and T2 signal intensity. We found that the TN subtype has the most distinctive MRI features compared to the other subtypes and luminal A and B have many similar features. Conclusion: The MRI features which are predictive of each subtype are the morphology, internal enhancement features, and T2 signal intensity, predominantly between TN and the rest. Radiologists' visual interpretation of some of MRI features may offer insight into the respective invasive breast cancer molecular subtype. However, current evidence are still limited to "suggestive" features instead of a diagnostic standard. Further research is recommended to explore this potential application, for example, by augmentation of radiologists' visual interpretation by artificial intelligence.
引用
收藏
页码:S89 / S106
页数:18
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Differences in Clinical Outcomes between Luminal A and B Type Breast Cancers according to the St. Gallen Consensus 2013 [J].
Ahn, Hyo Jung ;
Jung, Soo Jin ;
Kim, Tae Hyun ;
Oh, Min Kyung ;
Yoon, Hye-Kyoung .
JOURNAL OF BREAST CANCER, 2015, 18 (02) :149-159
[2]   Breast cancer imaging features as a predictor of the hormonal receptor status, HER2neu expression and molecular subtype [J].
Algazzar, Maged Abdelfattah Ali ;
Elsayed, Elsayed El-Mekkawy ;
Alhanafy, Alshimaa Mahmoud ;
Mousa, Waleed Abdelfattah .
EGYPTIAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 51 (01)
[3]  
Azzam H., 2019, EGYPT J RADIOL NUC M, V50, P1, DOI [10.1186/s43055-019-0001-3, DOI 10.1186/S43055-019-0001-3]
[4]   Role of MRI in the staging of breast cancer patients: does histological type and molecular subtype matter? [J].
Bitencourt, Almir G. V. ;
Pereira, Nara P. ;
Franca, Luciana K. L. ;
Silva, Caroline B. ;
Paludo, Jociana ;
Paiva, Hugo L. S. ;
Graziano, Luciana ;
Guatelli, Camila S. ;
Souza, Juliana A. ;
Marques, Elvira F. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2015, 88 (1055)
[5]   MRI Phenotype of Breast Cancer: Kinetic Assessment for Molecular Subtypes [J].
Blaschke, Eric ;
Abe, Hiroyuki .
JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 2015, 42 (04) :920-924
[6]   Triple-Negative Breast Cancers: Associations Between Imaging and Pathological Findings for Triple-Negative Tumors Compared With HormoneReceptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-2-Negative Breast Cancers [J].
Boisserie-Lacroix, Martine ;
MacGrogan, Gaetan ;
Debled, Marc ;
Ferron, Stephane ;
Asad-Syed, Maryam ;
McKelvie-Sebileau, Pippa ;
Mathoulin-Pelissier, Simone ;
Brouste, Veronique ;
Hurtevent-Labrot, Gabrielle .
ONCOLOGIST, 2013, 18 (07) :802-811
[7]   EXPRESSION OF VASCULAR-PERMEABILITY FACTOR (VASCULAR ENDOTHELIAL GROWTH-FACTOR) AND ITS RECEPTORS IN BREAST-CANCER [J].
BROWN, LF ;
BERSE, B ;
JACKMAN, RW ;
TOGNAZZI, K ;
GUIDI, AJ ;
DVORAK, HF ;
SENGER, DR ;
CONNOLLY, JL ;
SCHNITT, SJ .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1995, 26 (01) :86-91
[8]   Associations Between Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings and Clincopathologic Factors in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer [J].
Choi, Bo Bae ;
Kim, Sung Hun ;
Youn, InKyung .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY, 2019, 43 (02) :252-256
[9]   The molecular diversity of Luminal A breast tumors [J].
Ciriello, Giovanni ;
Sinha, Rileen ;
Hoadley, Katherine A. ;
Jacobsen, Anders S. ;
Reva, Boris ;
Perou, Charles M. ;
Sander, Chris ;
Schultz, Nikolaus .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2013, 141 (03) :409-420
[10]   Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Comparison With Luminal and HER2-Overexpressing Tumors [J].
Costantini, Melania ;
Belli, Paolo ;
Distefano, Daniela ;
Bufi, Enida ;
Di Matteo, Marialuisa ;
Rinaldi, Pierluigi ;
Giuliani, Michela ;
Petrone, Gianluigi ;
Magno, Stefano ;
Bonomo, Lorenzo .
CLINICAL BREAST CANCER, 2012, 12 (05) :331-339