Predicting Gleason Score of Prostate Cancer Patients Using Radiomic Analysis

被引:76
作者
Chaddad, Ahmad [1 ,2 ]
Niazi, Tamim [1 ]
Probst, Stephan [3 ]
Bladou, Franck [4 ]
Anidjar, Maurice [4 ]
Bahoric, Boris [1 ]
机构
[1] McGill Univ, Div Radiat Oncol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[2] ETS, Dept Automated Prod Engn, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[3] McGill Univ, Div Nucl Med, Montreal, PQ, Canada
[4] McGill Univ, Dept Urol, Montreal, PQ, Canada
关键词
biomarkers; classification; gleason score; radiomics; prostate cancer; APPARENT DIFFUSION-COEFFICIENT; COMPUTER-AIDED DETECTION; MORTALITY; FEATURES; HETEROGENEITY; RADIOTHERAPY; RADIATION;
D O I
10.3389/fonc.2018.00630
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Use of quantitative imaging features and encoding the intra-tumoral heterogeneity from multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the prediction of Gleason score is gaining attention as a non-invasive biomarker for prostate cancer (PCa). This study tested the hypothesis that radiomic features, extracted from mpMRI, could predict the Gleason score pattern of patients with PCa. Methods: This analysis included T2-weighted (T2-WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC, computed from diffusion-weighted imaging) scans of 99 PCa patients from The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA). A total of 41 radiomic features were calculated from a local tumor sub-volume (i.e., regions of interest) that is determined by a centroid coordinate of PCa volume, grouped based on their Gleason score patterns. Kruskal-Wallis and Spearman's rank correlation tests were used to identify features related to Gleason score groups. Randomforest (RF) classifier model was used to predict Gleason score groups and identify the most important signature among the 41 radiomic features. Results: Gleason score groups could be discriminated based on zone size percentage, large zone size emphasis and zone size non-uniformity values (p < 0.05). These features also showed a significant correlation between radiomic features and Gleason score groups with a correlation value of -0.35, 0.32, 0.42 for the large zone size emphasis, zone size non-uniformity and zone size percentage, respectively (corrected p < 0.05). RF classifier model achieved an average of the area under the curves of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of 83.40, 72.71, and 77.35% to predict Gleason score groups (G1) = 6; 6 < (G2) < (3 + 4) and (G3) >= 4 + 3, respectively. Conclusion: Our results suggest that the radiomic features can be used as a non-invasive biomarker to predict the Gleason score of the PCa patients.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[41]   Prostate cancer radiomics and the promise of radiogenomics [J].
Stoyanova, Radka ;
Takhar, Mandeep ;
Tschudi, Yohann ;
Ford, John C. ;
Solorzano, Gabriel ;
Erho, Nicholas ;
Balagurunathan, Yoganand ;
Punnen, Sanoj ;
Davicioni, Elai ;
Gillies, Robert J. ;
Pollack, Alan .
TRANSLATIONAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2016, 5 (04) :432-447
[42]  
Thibault G., 2009, 10th Intl. Conf. on Pattern Recognition and Information Processing (PRIP), Minsk, P140
[43]   Multi-kernel graph embedding for detection, Gleason grading of prostate cancer via MRI/MRS [J].
Tiwari, Pallavi ;
Kurhanewicz, John ;
Madabhushi, Anant .
MEDICAL IMAGE ANALYSIS, 2013, 17 (02) :219-235
[44]   Diffusion-weighted Endorectal MR Imaging at 3 T for Prostate Cancer: Tumor Detection and Assessment of Aggressiveness [J].
Vargas, Hebert Alberto ;
Akin, Oguz ;
Franiel, Tobias ;
Mazaheri, Yousef ;
Zheng, Junting ;
Moskowitz, Chaya ;
Udo, Kazuma ;
Eastham, James ;
Hricak, Hedvig .
RADIOLOGY, 2011, 259 (03) :775-784
[45]   Automatic computer-aided detection of prostate cancer based on multiparametric magnetic resonance image analysis [J].
Vos, P. C. ;
Barentsz, J. O. ;
Karssemeijer, N. ;
Huisman, H. J. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2012, 57 (06) :1527-1542
[46]   Machine learning-based analysis of MR radiomics can help to improve the diagnostic performance of PI-RADS v2 in clinically relevant prostate cancer [J].
Wang, Jing ;
Wu, Chen-Jiang ;
Bao, Mei-Ling ;
Zhang, Jing ;
Wang, Xiao-Ning ;
Zhang, Yu-Dong .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2017, 27 (10) :4082-4090
[47]   Histogram analysis of diffusion kurtosis magnetic resonance imaging in differentiation of pathologic Gleason grade of prostate cancer [J].
Wang, Qing ;
Li, Hai ;
Yan, Xu ;
Wu, Chen-Jiang ;
Liu, Xi-Sheng ;
Shi, Hai-Bin ;
Zhang, Yu-Dong .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (08) :337.e15-337.e24
[48]   Pathologic outcomes for low-risk prostate cancer after delayed radical prostatectomy in the United States [J].
Weiner, Adam B. ;
Patel, Sanjay G. ;
Eggener, Scott E. .
UROLOGIC ONCOLOGY-SEMINARS AND ORIGINAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2015, 33 (04) :164.e11-164.e17
[49]   PI-RADS Prostate Imaging - Reporting and Data System: 2015, Version 2 [J].
Weinreb, Jeffrey C. ;
Barentsz, Jelle O. ;
Choyke, Peter L. ;
Cornud, Francois ;
Haider, Masoom A. ;
Macura, Katarzyna J. ;
Margolis, Daniel ;
Schnall, Mitchell D. ;
Shtern, Faina ;
Tempany, Clare M. ;
Thoeny, Harriet C. ;
Verma, Sadna .
EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2016, 69 (01) :16-40
[50]   Haralick texture analysis of prostate MRI: utility for differentiating non-cancerous prostate from prostate cancer and differentiating prostate cancers with different Gleason scores [J].
Wibmer, Andreas ;
Hricak, Hedvig ;
Gondo, Tatsuo ;
Matsumoto, Kazuhiro ;
Veeraraghavan, Harini ;
Fehr, Duc ;
Zheng, Junting ;
Goldman, Debra ;
Moskowitz, Chaya ;
Fine, Samson W. ;
Reuter, Victor E. ;
Eastham, James ;
Sala, Evis ;
Vargas, Hebert Alberto .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2015, 25 (10) :2840-2850